Right, that code got left in lem when i split it off from em by mistake,
just cleaning that up.
Will commit this then.
Jack
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:09 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:46:59 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> > No, like so:
>
> This looks good to me. The 82574 is
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 1:46:59 pm Jack Vogel wrote:
> No, like so:
This looks good to me. The 82574 is supported by em(4) and not lem(4) it
seems, hence removing that?
--
John Baldwin
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 12:29:32 pm Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Yes, I agree John, that was ugly, I'm already taking care of it with my
> > changes,
> > I'll send you a copy to check out.
>
> Like so:
>
> --- //depot/user/gcooper/atf-head/src/
No, like so:
--- if_lem.c2012-07-31 18:32:50.0 -0700
+++ if_lem.jfv.c2012-07-31 18:31:25.0 -0700
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
/**
- Copyright (c) 2001-2011, Intel Corporation
+ Copyright (c) 2001-2012, Intel
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> Yes, I agree John, that was ugly, I'm already taking care of it with my
> changes,
> I'll send you a copy to check out.
Like so:
--- //depot/user/gcooper/atf-head/src/sys/dev/e1000/if_lem.c
2012-07-25 17:11:00.0
+++ /scratch/p4/us
Yes, I agree John, that was ugly, I'm already taking care of it with my
changes,
I'll send you a copy to check out.
Jack
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:12 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:16:07 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On Tuesday, July 31, 2012 11:16:07 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> > On 7/28/12 2:09 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Can you please revert this commit for now?
> >>
> >> * it has some netmap stuff in it that isn't related to the com
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Andrey Zonov wrote:
> On 7/28/12 2:09 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can you please revert this commit for now?
>>
>> * it has some netmap stuff in it that isn't related to the commit;
>> * it's causing panics due to lock recursion;
>
>
> I can confirm pan
On 7/28/12 2:09 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
Can you please revert this commit for now?
* it has some netmap stuff in it that isn't related to the commit;
* it's causing panics due to lock recursion;
I can confirm panics with the latest HEAD running under ESX.
_mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non
I have some changes that are needed anyway, I will change this to a
tuneable.
Jack
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:45 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:28:15 am Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > Author: luigi
> > Date: Wed Jul 25 11:28:15 2012
> > New Revision: 238765
> > URL: http://svn
On Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:28:15 am Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Author: luigi
> Date: Wed Jul 25 11:28:15 2012
> New Revision: 238765
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238765
>
> Log:
> Use legacy interrupts as a default. This gives up to 10% speedup
> when used in qemu (and this driver
Hi,
Can you please revert this commit for now?
* it has some netmap stuff in it that isn't related to the commit;
* it's causing panics due to lock recursion;
* it likely has other issues you haven't yet found. :)
Adrian
On 25 July 2012 04:28, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Author: luigi
> Date: Wed J
Author: luigi
Date: Wed Jul 25 11:28:15 2012
New Revision: 238765
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/238765
Log:
Use legacy interrupts as a default. This gives up to 10% speedup
when used in qemu (and this driver is for non-PCIe cards,
so probably its largest use is in virtualized en
13 matches
Mail list logo