Jim Leonard boldly stated:
>
>Do *NOT* use Norton on them yet -- Norton will write bad data back to the disk
>if it can't read it either, forever sealing your chances of reading the disk.
>If you need the data restored, let me/us know the name of the program and we
>might have a cracked version i
C.E. Forman boldly stated:
>
>I suspected Jim was a bit strange when he said he breaks shrinkwrap.
I've seen this mentioned a few times, and at the risk of ruining
whatever small, dubious reputation I might have worked up here, I'm in
favor of breaking shrinkwrap, too. (In most cases.) I picked
"C.E. Forman" wrote:
>
> >>Would moving the original label on to a freshly made copy of the disk be
> >>satisfactory?
> >
> >For my purposes, yes. Even if the copy-protection were still intact (ie.
> an
> >EXACT copy).
>
> I suspected Jim was a bit strange when he said he breaks shrinkwrap.
> B
"C.E. Forman" wrote:
>
> Question about "Fine": If we change it to "F", it will be the same as
> "Fair".
>
> ..or do "Fair" and "Poor" always go together, hence a single entry on
> the scale (F/P)? And if that's the case, would you mind if I wrote that
> as "F-P" on the Shoppe pages, as it's ea
Question about "Fine": If we change it to "F", it will be the same as
"Fair".
..or do "Fair" and "Poor" always go together, hence a single entry on
the scale (F/P)? And if that's the case, would you mind if I wrote that
as "F-P" on the Shoppe pages, as it's easier to decipher "F-P/NM" than
"F/P/
>>Would moving the original label on to a freshly made copy of the disk be
>>satisfactory?
>
>For my purposes, yes. Even if the copy-protection were still intact (ie.
an
>EXACT copy).
I suspected Jim was a bit strange when he said he breaks shrinkwrap.
But nothing can compare to *wanting* the ev
Thank you for reacting accordingly to the amount of hard work and mental
illness that obviously went into my display.
Yes, they are custom shelves built by a company called California Closets.
They are national so I recommend them if there is one in your area. Not
too expensive and they'll m
"Lee K. Seitz" wrote:
>
> Jim Leonard boldly stated:
> >
> >PS: Lee, your email client keeps "forcing" the Reply-To: address header to be
> >the hiwaay.net address -- this affects the mailing list since people will
> >(R)eply to the message and later find out it only went to you instead of back
Hugh Falk wrote:
>
> Do you have the original boxes for everything as well? If so, everything
> (including the 40 tapes) would probalby go for about $200 - $250 on a good
> day.
No original boxes, but I do have original instructions and cassette
"slipcovers" (did these things even come in boxes
Hugh Falk wrote:
>
> Here is a pic of some of my games. I tried to get as much in as I could on
> this wall, but it doesn't quite cover it. I also have other sets of
> shelves not pictured. The sad part is that many of these shelves go two
> deep with games. I just moved in and am still organ
"Lee K. Seitz" wrote:
>
> Just curious, do you think this item is legitimate? It's supposedly a
> copy of The Lost Treasures of Infocom for the Apple IIgs. The
> description itself states that it supposedly doesn't exist.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=424657806
Wo
"Lee K. Seitz" wrote:
>
> Earlier this week I decided to go back and buy the two other Cosmi
> games I'd mentioned finding earlier for myself, since no one else was
> interested. I was disappointed to find the disks don't seem to be
> readable. (I can get a directory listing most of the time, b
Slighly revised version of the scale; the Good and Fine abbreviations of GO and
FI have been truncated to G and F to be consistent with most naming scales.
Their meaning is the same.
--
http://www.MobyGames.com/
The world's most comprehensive historical PC gaming database project.
The Officia
13 matches
Mail list logo
