On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Pablo RodrÃguez oi...@web.de wrote:
Hi Matt,
I'm afraid that the Linux binary might not use compression for the
output PDF. I experienced that before with swfc (not sure with pdf2swf
[I can't remember it]). Which Linux distribution are you using? Did you
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 11:48:32 -0400
Matt Sergeant m...@hubdoc.com wrote:
Did you see the dots difference I posted most recently? I'm pretty
sure it's related to the dots, not compression, as swfdump gives a
significantly different output, and a visual inspection shows that
the two SWFs are
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 2:10 PM, List_Subs list_s...@mavdns.net wrote:
Sure, but I think the dots is the problem, and so I'd like to know
how to get the same results as the Mac produced, otherwise I'm going
to have to switch to an ImageMagick/convert version for this app and
use images.
I'm a linux user who prefers using the command line whenever possible.
I've done little with graphics but I'm preparing a presentation for which
I want to do some simple animation. OpenOffice is frustrating me. Swftools
looks perfect and I've converted an office-generated pdf file with 32
frames
I found the -s option and the framerate param under that.
Now I'd like it to show only 1 iteration.
Sorry for the stupid newbie questions, but this could go a lot faster. =8-O
-Michael
I'm a linux user who prefers using the command line whenever possible.
I've done little with graphics but
-t inserts a stop() in each page. Does that help?
It's a bit tricky though, to know where any issue lies, without
seeing the original pdf. Able to link to it?
Incidentally, OpenOffice is no longer what it once was. If I were
you I'd completely remove it, and replace with LibreOffice,
