I seem to remember that while it is possible to define, the compiler will yield
an error if you try to use the functions (“cannot resolve”).
Regards,
Rien
Site: http://balancingrock.nl
Blog: http://swiftrien.blogspot.com
Github: http://github.com/Swiftrien
Project: http://swiftfire.nl
> On 1
Thanks, David. That's interesting as a thought exercise, but doesn't really get
me away from having switch statements. I'll probably end up just "slightly
polluting" my classes by adding extension methods to create the appropriate
auxiliary classes. Sure wish Swift supported optional methods wit
Seems like you are missing some bridges here since NSDecimalNumber’s signature
takes an object
let value = NSDecimalNumber(value: 2)
let test = 2.0 // double
let product = value.multiplying(by: 2.0) // compiles
let x = value.multiplying(by: Decim
Literals in Swift do not inherently have a type (at least conceptually).
They are simply literals.
The compiler will interpret them as whatever ExpressibleBy_Literal type
is required to make the expression sensible.
There are default types which literals will become if no type information
is
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Toni Suter via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would have expected that the following code reports an error, because
> of ambiguous function overloads:
>
> infix operator ***: MultiplicationPrecedence
> infix operator +++: AdditionPrecedence
>
> func ***(x:
> On Nov 14, 2016, at 16:05, Toni Suter via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would have expected that the following code reports an error, because
> of ambiguous function overloads:
>
> infix operator ***: MultiplicationPrecedence
> infix operator +++: AdditionPrecedence
>
> func ***(x: In
> On Nov 12, 2016, at 3:13 AM, Trevör ANNE DENISE via swift-users
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have an issue with a project, I was trying to inspect the value of a
> constant of type [GeneType], this type is defined as an associatedtype of a
> protocol, so there is no explicit type for it, just
Hi,
I would have expected that the following code reports an error, because
of ambiguous function overloads:
infix operator ***: MultiplicationPrecedence
infix operator +++: AdditionPrecedence
func ***(x: Int, y: Int) -> String {
print("f1")
return ""
}
func ***(x: Int, y: Int)
Thanks for that follow up, I’m still a little confused at why one direction
works and the other does not, but I’m getting there.
I’ve found another issue I’ll bug report, but it’s along the same lines and
wanted to run it by this thread. If I have an NSDecimalNumber, in Swift, and
perform math
Many thanks to Tim for suggesting isSubset, which I had somehow missed
while browsing the documentation.
To answer Dave's questions: unfortunately the Set comparisons aren't an
ideal candidate for asynchronous work. The comparisons take place as part
of a CSS-like styling phase, whereby a number o
Hi Swift enthusiasts!
My name is Dmitri Pavlutin. I'm a Swift enthusiast too!
I blog about Swift and JavaScript languages at https://rainsoft.io.
When I publish articles about Swift, one drawback (compared to
JavaScript situation) is the limited number of places where I can
share new articles. S
Hello,
I have an issue with a project, I was trying to inspect the value of a constant
of type [GeneType], this type is defined as an associatedtype of a protocol, so
there is no explicit type for it, just a constraint to be Hashable :
> protocol GAStandardGenomeRepresentable {
>
>assoc
Maybe you should ask this question in
https://forums.developer.apple.com/welcome
Zhaoxin
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:26 PM, J.E. Schotsman via swift-users <
swift-users@swift.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some code that is used in both a project with minimum deployment
> target 10.9 and a projec
Hello,
I have some code that is used in both a project with minimum deployment target
10.9 and a project with minimum deployment target 10.11.
If I check for availability of API’s on the 10.9 project I get warnings on the
10.11 project saying these checks are unnecessary.
Can I conditionalize th
14 matches
Mail list logo
