Hi Alexander,
gboolean and gint are equivalent.
--Semyon
On 4/27/2015 5:31 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 4/23/2015 5:23 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
web rev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/6260348/webrev.00/
bug:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079640
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8079640/webrev.00/
*THE ROOT CAUSE
Component minimum size is limited to Short.MAX_VALUE in GroupLayout.
JDK turtorial
Hi Semyon,
the fix itself looks good to me, but the test doesn't work.
1. FileWriter is replacing the .gtkrc-2.0 file (FileWriter(file, true
/*append*/) should be used) ;
2. settings from .gtkrc-2.0 doesn't taken into account on my system.
there are at least two system tools which allows to
There is no issue here and the tests that used to work with jtreg b05
didn't do what you thought they did. Just look at the .jtr file and see
what jtreg actually did before.
First, you need to realize that @build is a shorthand for @run
build.The section on shorthands is in the very next
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9. I do not plan to backport it to jdk8.
Usage of deprecated methods(xxxMenuBar()) were removed as suggested in
the bug comments.
The fix is a part of https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8066622
efforts.
Bug:
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 5/8/2015 11:51 AM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi Alexander,
gboolean and gint are equivalent.
--Semyon
On 4/27/2015 5:31 PM, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
On 4/23/2015 5:23 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
web
Hi, Semyon.
It will be good to dig into the history of GroupLayout and understand
why this was constrained, note that tutorial should be updated also.
On 08.05.15 11:47, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079640
webrev:
Hi Jason,
Please, file it as a new issue in http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 5/7/2015 11:08 PM, Jason Mehrens wrote:
Anton,
I finally caught this error in production. I patched our code to launch a JVM
(with mergesort) using your test case, modifed to
Hi Alexander,
I've updated the existing issue filed by Jason with the new
information. So it seems no need to create a new one.
Thanks!
Anton.
On 08.05.2015 15:38, Alexander Scherbatiy wrote:
Hi Jason,
Please, file it as a new issue in http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport
Thanks,
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 5/7/2015 3:06 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
looks fine.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 05/06/2015 10:52 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for a typo in jdk9.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8013820
Webrev
On 5/8/2015 3:41 PM, Anton Nashatyrev wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I've updated the existing issue filed by Jason with the new
information. So it seems no need to create a new one.
I see. I have founds this one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8078376
Thanks,
Alexandr.
The fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexandr.
On 5/7/2015 3:48 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 05/07/2015 02:46 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9.
All our UI components use a UIResource to store some lf related
Hello.
Please review one more small fix for a typo in jdk9.
Description for constructor public JSpinner.DateEditor(JSpinner
spinner) containes:
This DateEditor becomes both a ChangeListener on the spinners model
and a PropertyChangeListener on the new JFormattedTextField.
In fact
13 matches
Mail list logo
