> would they not then block official port 587 as well as port 25?
> That was the position I heard the 'customer service rep' take the last
> time I tried to solve such a problem through appeal to bureaucratic
> sensibility.
There isn't really a (valid) reason to block port 587:
Blocking outgoi
> If the provider on which one is guesting has a policy to block
> outbound access from their network to all ports used for sending of
> mail, so that they can force one through their SMTP server for sake
> of control, micromanagement, or whatever, then (assuming they know
> about it), would they
Adrian,
Aren't you making an error in reflection (Überlegungsfehler)?
If the provider on which one is guesting has a policy to block outbound
access from their network to all ports used for sending of mail, so that
they can force one through their SMTP server for sake of control,
micromanagemen
3 matches
Mail list logo
