On 08 Jun 2023 Jonas Meier via swinog wrote:
> maybe there is an option to remove the signature. If anyone has
> experience with mailman3 and dkim, please write to me directly.
You can set `remove_dkim_headers: yes` in mailman.cfg [1]
(Sending this to the list, as this may be relevant for more pe
Noting you do part of this already.
But. note this nasty effect:
---
From: Jonas Meier via swinog
Reply-To: Jonas Meier
---
Now add that to people having "automatically add recipient to addressbook" and
when one wants to send an email to Jonas... it autocompletes to the public list
> On 8 Jun 2023, at 11:47, Jonas Meier via swinog
> wrote:
>
> Hi Franco, Dear List
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> 1) I configured mailman3 [1] dmarc_mitigate_action to "munge_from" (to
> replace the from header) and dmarc_mitigate_unconditionally to true. My
> thought was that this
Hi Franco, Dear List
Thank you for your feedback.
1) I configured mailman3 [1] dmarc_mitigate_action to "munge_from" (to
replace the from header) and dmarc_mitigate_unconditionally to true. My
thought was that this would mean that there can no longer be a dmarc
policy which sets dkim to stric
Dear SwiNOG community,
we could finally compile the agenda for the upcoming SwiNOG #38 – June
Wednesday 21st
Have a look at https://www.swinog.ch/meetings/swinog38/
There is still time to https://register.swinog.ch/ if you have not done it
already.
We have a super packed agenda. On the other h
Hi Daniel,
> Your nameserver breaks https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8020
I'd rather say 'does not implement' instead of 'break':
As RFC 8020 points out, the (almost 30 years older) RFC 1034 is very unspecific
about the details on how a nameserver should behave in such a situation.
(And opinion
6 matches
Mail list logo
