Re: [swinog] New Website: Open Root Server Network (ORSN)

On Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:47:20 +0200, Marco Huggenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > New Website: Open Root Server Network (ORSN) is online now at: > http://www.orsn.org/ - The Independent DNS Solution with IPv6 support > for the European Community. I don't really want to start yet another discuss

Re: [swinog] ns1.ip-plus.net out of service ?

I think that this server replies with REFUSED to any query for which it can't provide an authoritative answer if the source of the query is located outside of ip-plus (returning a referral would be more adequate IMHO, but this is a different issue). Now, swisscom.com isn't even deleagted to this s

Re: [swinog] Server doesn't listen/answer on port 53 for TCP protocol

On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:55:24 +0100, Mickey Coggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> Why do I need to allow TCP connections? To me, TCP is AXFR and I'm NOT >> going to allow AXFR for everyone. > Just allow them for the SWITCH machines. No biggie. Something like: > acl transfer-nets { > ..

Re: [swinog] Server doesn't listen/answer on port 53 for TCP protocol

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 10:44:33 +0100, Jean-Pierre Schwickerath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> SWITCH doesn't do any zone transfers as part of the delegation check. >> That would be fun, though :-) > Doesn't SWITCH do any "RIPE Region Hostcount" anymore? Yes, we do (in fact, this month's run has ju

Re: [swinog] Server doesn't listen/answer on port 53 for TCP protocol

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:37:12 +0100, Daniel Lorch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >>> Doesn't SWITCH do any "RIPE Region Hostcount" anymore? >> Yes, we do (in fact, this month's run has just started yesterday :-) > Doesn't hostcount mean, that you get the in-addr.arpa zone? No. Please have a look at

Re: [swinog] Server doesn't listen/answer on port 53 for TCP protocol

On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 12:33:49 +0100, Daniel Lorch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> But this is completely independent of the checks performed by the >> domain name registry. > Is AXFR a requirement or not? Your FAQ doesn't say anything, your > helpdesk doesn't respond, please, I need to know :) As h

[swinog] Alert for bluewin DNS admins

It appears that the bluewin DNS caches are using an old key for verifying DNSSEC for the zone switch.ch, as can be seen by using the "cd" option of dig ; <<>> DiG 9.6.1-P1 <<>> @dns1.bluewin.ch. switch.ch. soa ; (1 server found) ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY

Re: [swinog] Alert for bluewin DNS admins

On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 14:37:03 +0200, said: > hi alexander >> ... >> I sent mail to hostmas...@bluewin.ch but I'm not sure whether >> that gets the proper attention. This is a serious issue for us. >> ... > thanks, i've forwarded the mail to the DNS guys from bluewin ,-) Thanks. >> BTW, is the

[swinog] DNSSEC signing of root zone

I suppose most of you are aware of the plans for signing the root zone by ICANN/VeriSign presented at the last RIPE meeting According to the draft timel

Re: [swinog] Bluewin DNS problems

[ I've already sent this to our colleagues at Swisscom, but this should really go to the list ] On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:16:14 +0100, Benjamin Schlageter said: > Hi > Anybody knows something about big DNS troubles with Bluewin ADSL/VDSL? > As I saw, my router can¹t resolve any domains... Lucky I

Re: [swinog] DNS: Clueless: Strange problems resolving ch domains...

On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:58:07 +0200, "Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst" said: > Solution: > Routing to 138.190.0.0/16 was broken (blackholed at upstream), so both > (dns[12].swisscom.com) were not reachable. Ok, but I'd still say that you have a problem with your IPv6 connectivity. > I will have t

Re: [swinog] Huge delays in 1.4.e164.arpa NAPTR lookups?

On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 15:33:28 +0200, Benoit Panizzon said: > Hi out there > The last few days I noticed quite a large delay when I first dial a number > from my asterisk server. > I found that the problem is that the 1.4.e164.arpa lookup takes enormous time > to return a NXDOMAIN > == ast_ge

Re: [swinog] www.microsoft.com issues

On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:10:17 +0200, Jeroen Massar said: > On 2010-07-27 14:57, Michel Renfer wrote: >> Hi All >> >> We saw some strange issues with the reachability of www.microsoft.com. >> Sometimes the >> site is reachable sometimes not. Anyone experienced similar issues? > I would say it is

Re: [swinog] Motorola ADSL Routers: DNS proxy bug?

On Sat, 4 Sep 2010 17:26:40 +0200, Benoit Panizzon said: > Hi all > I seam to quite often stumble over this bug and wonder if the router is buggy > or the client is buggy. > Most Motorola ADSL/VDSL Routers which Swisscom sent to their customers for > about the last two years or so, have a DNS

Re: [swinog] DNS: Is a SOA required?

On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:02:04 +0200, Beat Siegenthaler said: > On 04.10.10 15:04, Benoit Panizzon wrote: >> Hello >> >> I quite often stumble over DNS entries without SOA. >> > Indeed, this also new for me. > at least BIND won't serve zones without SOA-Record.. > Found something about it her

Re: [swinog] www.nic.ch

On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 07:14:55 +0200, "Matthias Hertzog" said: > it's okay now. What happened? There was a power outage in the data center of the University of Lausanne. In case you wonder: there are two instances of the domain name registry (the other one is located at the ETH Zurich), but the f