Hi Chris,
Here are two more that support LACP tunneling at wire speed.
Juniper EX series
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/concept/l2pt-ex-series.html
RAD ETX series
http://www.rad.com/12/Ethernet-over-Fiber/13101/
Regards,
Fadi
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Jérôme
Hi Chris,
Here are two more that support LACP tunneling at wire speed.
Juniper EX series
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos12.1/topics/concept/l2pt-ex-series.html
RAD ETX series
http://www.rad.com/12/Ethernet-over-Fiber/13101/
Regards,
Fadi
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Jérôme
Hi Roman,
Most ISPs would use BGP and typically it would look like this:
ISP-iBGP_AS100-ISP
| |
| |
eBGP eBGP
| |
|
Hi Roman,
I cannot speak for others but I would imagine that any ISPs should be
willing to run such setups, at least I can confirm in the ISP where I work
we do this all the time, for both PA and PI.
Regards,
Fadi
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Roman Hochuli
roman.hoch...@nexellent.chwrote:
Hi John,
In my company we will accept or advertise upto /48, also most of our
upstreams will do the same. As for routing sub-allocations from a different
AS some providers do that some don`t, as you said they will have to be
convinced (but it`s not really good practice for PA space).
Regards,
Hi Benoit,
Can`t say for sure how srf do it but in most cases this is done based
on internet registry queries (RIPE db for example). Maybe you checked
this already but it is possible that the specific IPs having the issue
are not directly related to the /19 you mentionned but to a smaller
more
6 matches
Mail list logo