Re: [swinog] Re: blocking ports?

On Wednesday 11 April 2007 19:26:39 Markus Wild wrote: You'd be amazed how many companies operate their own mail servers, even behind dynamic addresses (in which case they usually use some mailbox polling mechanism to feed their server from mail from the outside), but send outgoing mail

Re: [swinog] Level 3 down?

On Wednesday 01 November 2006 09:08, Vincent Magnin wrote: 5 swiCE2-10GE-1-3.switch.ch (130.59.37.1) 2.784 ms 2.663 ms 2.875 ms 6 ge-5-2.hsa2.Geneva1.Level3.net (213.242.73.137) 2.683 ms 2.843 ms 2.620 ms 7 so-5-0-0.mpls2.Geneva1.Level3.net (4.68.125.181) 3.072 ms 2.895 ms

Re: [swinog] Cablecom Internet Port 25

Daniel Lorch wrote: Ja, es nennt sich Message Submission. Das ist quasi SMTP auf einem anderen Port. Zur Zeit gibts ja zwei Arten von SMTPs: Einer, der empfängt und einer der Weiterschickt (das Relaying), beide sind auf Port 25. Ich glaube das passende RFC dazu ist

Re: [swinog] Cablecom blockages out of control?

Benoit Panizzon wrote: Sorry, the Helpdesk is completely useless if you're not a CC customer. As such I can pretty much attest that is pretty much useless to those, as well. A few years ago, my cable suddenly stopped working. After calling them 4 days in a row (nothing worked, after all