[swinog] FW: IPv6 de-aggregation

2012-04-27 Diskussionsfäden John.Collins
Hi again Swinog members, Many thanks for the many informative replies. Some or maybe most (random sample) of the /48s in the routing table are not PIs - needs further analysis. Regarding the PI suggestion, what do we do with customers who will never have an own AS and will never be dual

Re: [swinog] FW: IPv6 de-aggregation

2012-04-27 Diskussionsfäden Jeroen Massar
On 27 Apr 2012, at 12:01, john.coll...@bit.admin.ch wrote: Hi again Swinog members, Many thanks for the many informative replies. Some or maybe most (random sample) of the /48s in the routing table are not PIs - needs further analysis See GRH (http://grh.sixxs.net) for that as it

Re: [swinog] FW: IPv6 de-aggregation

2012-04-27 Diskussionsfäden Stanislav Sinyagin
: Friday, April 27, 2012 12:01 PM Subject: [swinog] FW: IPv6 de-aggregation Hi again Swinog members, Many thanks for the many informative replies.  Some or maybe most (random sample) of the /48s in the routing table are not PIs - needs further analysis. Regarding the PI suggestion