]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 10:02
An: studer.patr...@gmx.ch
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Dear Patrick,
We have been using PC based (HP servers + SSD) Vyatta routers for some time,
they work extremely well at the fraction of the price of Cisco gear
**
Von: Andreas Fink [mailto:af...@list.fink.org]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 15:04
An: Patrick Studer
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
off the list.
On 23.09.2009, at 13:41, Patrick Studer wrote:
Hallo Andreas
Wenn ich Dich richtig verstehe, dann
, 22. September 2009 12:48
An: 'Patrick Studer'
Betreff: RE: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hi Patrick
If you are planning full tables and want to grow to +100Mbps don't take 28xx
platform.
What is neat is ASR1002 I tested it and recommend it. They have a 2.5G box now
that is also
Fax+41 61 315 85 59
**
Von: Andreas Fink [mailto:af...@list.fink.org]
Gesendet: Montag, 21. September 2009 13:37
An: Patrick Studer
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hallo Patrick,
Wir
Fax+41 61 315 85 59
**
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Daniel Aubry [mailto:o...@chaostreff.ch]
Gesendet: Samstag, 19. September 2009 15:07
An: Patrick Studer
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing
]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 23:08
An: Patrick Studer
Betreff: AW: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hoi
Dann würde mir so spontan ColoBâle in den Sinn kommen :)
Gruss
Reto
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Patrick Studer [mailto:p.stu...@x-netconsulting.ch
**
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bernd SPIESS [mailto:bernd.spi...@ascus.at]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 20:15
An: 'Patrick Studer'
Betreff: RE: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
yes - its a good box - but think that a new one
**
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bernd SPIESS [mailto:bernd.spi...@ascus.at]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 20:15
An: 'Patrick Studer'
Betreff: RE: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
yes - its a good box - but think that a new one will cost about
Alexandre Egger wrote:
[..]
However, IMHO DDoS attacks are just like spam, nobody can really pretend
being able to stop them as of today.
There is a semi-partial solution which will cost you some cash, like
every other 'solution': anycast your network.
(Thus you are doing your own ISP and in
Jeoren,
Anycast is an option, but as you said expensive, but worst than that,
complex to maintain. On top of that, it requires skilled boys and their
salaries will go up quite quickly or you leave some company to do it for
you at a price, you probably do not want to afford, when you are a normal
Alexandre Egger wrote:
Jeoren,
Anycast is an option, but as you said expensive, but worst than that,
complex to maintain. On top of that, it requires skilled boys and their
salaries will go up quite quickly or you leave some company to do it for
you at a price, you probably do not want to
I wasn't giving any advices to you, obviously you don't need them ;) Other,
I know we are a bit off-topic, sorry, but it's interesting topic, isn't?
If you don't piss somebody or make them jealous they won't have a need
to attack you either.
Yes. However, sometimes you don't have the choice.
Alexandre Egger wrote:
I wasn't giving any advices to you, obviously you don't need them ;) Other,
I know we are a bit off-topic, sorry, but it's interesting topic, isn't?
Especially with the view that there are possibilities that ISPs get
threatened and take hosted sites offline, discussing
Hi
We are planning to go multihomed with our infrastructure.
The first step will be, to have 10 Mbit/s fixed or 100 Mbit/s burstable service
with an additional link to SwissIX where we want to do some privat peerings.
In a second step, we will add a second or a third upstream with about the
Betreff: RE: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
it depends
do you want to survive a ddos or not?
with 100 mbit link speed a 2811 will die for 100%
when you receive a dos/ddos in your direction
256 mb ram will also be to less for multihoming
if you want to have one or two full routing
Prisi [mailto:marcel.pr...@virtua.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 10:02
An: studer.patr...@gmx.ch
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Dear Patrick,
We have been using PC based (HP servers + SSD) Vyatta routers for some time,
they work extremely well
**
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Matthias Hertzog [mailto:m.hert...@mhs.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 10:10
An: p.stu...@x-netconsulting.ch
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Sali
Hi Patrick,
The first step will be, to have 10 Mbit/s fixed or 100 Mbit/s
burstable service
with an additional link to SwissIX where we want to do some privat
peerings.
In a second step, we will add a second or a third upstream with
about the
same speeds as the first connection. All
, 17. September 2009 10:41
An: studer.patr...@gmx.ch
Cc: 'swinog@lists.swinog.ch'
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hi Patrick,
The first step will be, to have 10 Mbit/s fixed or 100 Mbit/s
burstable service with an additional link to SwissIX where we want to
do some
**
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Peter Kohler [mailto:peter.koh...@netcetera.ch]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 11:22
An: studer.patr...@gmx.ch
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hi Patrick
...@lists.swinog.ch] On
Behalf Of Patrick Studer
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 11:17 AM
To: 'Pascal Gloor'
Cc: 'swinog@lists.swinog.ch'
Subject: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hi Pascale
That's an answer I was looking for.
Some more questions. Why you suggest the SP Service IOS?
What's
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:42:51AM +0200, Bernd SPIESS wrote:
you have to basicaly decide if you want a cpu driven box (28*, 38*,
NPE-G1/G2) or a hardware
driven box (sup32, sup720, c-120**)
in the first case you have to primary look for the cpu performance - in the
second case you have
Steinmann [mailto:st...@stony.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 10:40
An: studer.patr...@gmx.ch
Betreff: RE: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hoi Patrick
Ich würde schwer empfehlen, etwas grösseres reinzustellen. Erstens wächst
die BGP-Tabelle unaufhörlich, zweitens steigt der
: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
see here:
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
3725 = 179 mbit
3745 = 256 mbit
(best case calculated with 64 byte paket size)
you have to basicaly decide if you want a cpu driven box (28*, 38
: Reto Burkhalter [mailto:reto.burkhal...@basis06.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 14:26
An: Patrick Studer
Betreff: AW: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hoi Patrick
Dann empfehle ich an dieser Stelle doch mal die colozüri.ch - genügend
Carriers und ISPs vorhanden
. September 2009 16:10
An: p.stu...@x-netconsulting.ch
Betreff: Re: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
Hoi Patrick,
ich personlich wurde nicht mit einer kleinen Cisco 2811 oder dergleichen
anfangen. Mit vollem RAM-Ausbau bekommst Du dort hoechstwahrscheinlich
nur 1x Full Table rein und hast
**
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bernd SPIESS [mailto:bernd.spi...@ascus.at]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. September 2009 14:02
An: 'Patrick Studer'
Betreff: RE: [swinog] Full BGP Routing Router Requirements
ipv6 is running fine also on 28 plattform
asn32 - no practical info
27 matches
Mail list logo
