Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2007-01-17 Diskussionsfäden Claudio Jeker
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:15:09AM +0100, Daniel Lorch wrote: > Hi > > > I'd use qmail-ldap on UNIX for it. It's as stable and as scalable > > as you can get. The largest installation I know of has more than > > 3 million actual users on it in a large cluster. But then I'm biased. > > The only thi

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2007-01-17 Diskussionsfäden Daniel Lorch
Hi > I'd use qmail-ldap on UNIX for it. It's as stable and as scalable > as you can get. The largest installation I know of has more than > 3 million actual users on it in a large cluster. But then I'm biased. > The only thing coming close to it in scalability is Critical Path. > Both Yahoo Mail a

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-22 Diskussionsfäden Adrian Ulrich
Hi, > The only thing coming close to it in scalability is Critical Path. Does the windows version of Critical Path still exist? ;-) After all it's a good/stable product. (Well: i dislike the CP-smtpd .. it works unless you try to do anything funky .. but replacing it with postfix/qmail isn't a

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-22 Diskussionsfäden René Caspar
Hi Mike Take a look at Merak http://www.icewarp.com It's quite a stable solution we use since 6 years whitout a "real" problem. The last 2 years they made a lot of (imho) useless extensions, but you can buy only the components you need ;) If you have more questions - contact me offlist. cu Re

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Lukas Beeler
Hi, While i agree with all your points above, and don't think that Exchange is the right product for a plain ISP-Mail setup, it isn't as bad as you're trying to make it. * Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > That's the problem. When an exchange server goes bad you're offline > for a couple of

RE: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden ahauri
2006 9:03 AM To: swinog@swinog.ch Subject: Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions Hi Mike Between 2000 and 2004 my ISP used IMail. It was very easy to use, also those "plugin" against spam and virus was very nice. (till then, i don't know the linux-style aka spamassassin etc.) Some of

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Stanislav Sinyagin
ok, our 2 cents :) We've installed and successfully operate several Sw-Soft Plesk installations, they run for more than a year already, and they have been extremely stable. It is also nice to install a Greylisting server in front of a Plesk server. Then the amount of incoming spam is significant

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Roger Buchwalder
Hi Mike Between 2000 and 2004 my ISP used IMail. It was very easy to use, also those "plugin" against spam and virus was very nice. (till then, i don't know the linux-style aka spamassassin etc.) Some of these plugins created the same person, who made dnsstuff.com One of those guys is R. Scott

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Andre Oppermann
Edoardo Martelli wrote: Hi Mike Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail client and be tailored for a small ISP. Our specs: ~

Re: AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Edoardo Martelli
Hi Mike >> Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home >> on the *nix >> platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide >> anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail >> client and be tailored for a small ISP. >> >> Our specs: ~700 Dom

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Martin Ebnoether
On the Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 04:21:11PM +0100, Mike Kellenberger blubbered: Hi. > Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix Good luck. (You'll need it) CU, Venty -- Damit ich Euch immer in den Ohren liegen kann: http://www.semmel.ch/podcast Höret mein Audioblog!

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Matthias Leisi
Mike Kellenberger wrote: > Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix > platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide > anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, have a feature-rich webmail > client and be tailored for a small ISP. Do you really

AW: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Reto Burkhalter
Hallo Mike Ich "kenne" dar nur MDaemon [1] - soll noch gut sein.. [1] http://www.altn.com/ Gruss Reto > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Mike Kellenberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 21. Dezember 2006 16:21 > An: swinog@swinog.ch > Betr

Re: [swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Will van Gulik
Too bad *nix is not that easy for you, one of my recent setup seems to match this, using postfix, dovecot, amavisd-new, clamav, postgrey and horde as webmail. Anyway before that, I used to have a mailenable ( http://www.mailenable.com ) the free version worked fine, and the pro-full-enterpris

[swinog] Mail Server suggestions

2006-12-21 Diskussionsfäden Mike Kellenberger
We're looking around for a new mail server solution, since our mercur (www.atrium.de) server is just too unstable. Preferably it should run on windows (we're just not at home on the *nix platforms), have all it's config options in a sql database, provide anti-spam and anti-virus out of the box, ha