AW: AW: [swinog] contract

Thanks to all for the answers :-) Regards Ralf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 24. März 2006 13:17 An: swinog@swinog.ch Betreff: AW: AW: [swinog] contract A proof can be the use of a specific

AW: AW: [swinog] contract

iche Nachricht- > Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Gabriel Ambuehl > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. März 2006 10:08 > An: swinog@swinog.ch > Betreff: Re: AW: [swinog] contract > > On Friday 24 March 2006 09:41, Xaver Aerni wrote: > > 2. In jurist

AW: AW: [swinog] contract

on Gabriel Ambuehl Gesendet: Freitag, 24. März 2006 10:08 An: swinog@swinog.ch Betreff: Re: AW: [swinog] contract On Friday 24 March 2006 09:41, Xaver Aerni wrote: > 2. In juristical E-Mailforms are not a contract. The best way is > you send a contract by post... Like all other Providers like >

Re: AW: [swinog] contract

On Friday 24 March 2006 09:41, Xaver Aerni wrote: > 2. In juristical E-Mailforms are not a contract. The best way is you > send a contract by post... Like all other Providers like Swisscom, > Sunrise, etc. Than are you shure, that the contract is ok. > Only on Web... I think you will have some diff

AW: [swinog] contract

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think this is a justisical Problem. You can say is this allowed or not. I think when you have a big banner with Free xy... And you have in a shorter capalize this terms... Than the owner of this side will have a problem... 2. In juristical E-Mailfo