Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread nicc-lists email addy
ok, just had a chance to look at this. tried doing a stock standard build from CVS, the way I have always done it, and installed. then tried to use diatheke in the same way Darin did (diatheke -b asv -k jn15:1), and came up with this: dyld: diatheke Undefined symbols: __ZSt4cerr __ZSt4cout

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Joachim Ansorg
Try --disable-shared Joachim I did a sudo find / -name *.so -print and came up with nothing. So, it appears I'm not building with --enable-shared and there is no libsword.so in my path (or anywhere else, for that matter). Any other ideas? On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 06:10 PM,

Re: [sword-devel] Debian packages

2003-02-28 Thread danglassey
Hi, now that ICU has made it through the gcc transition I'm aiming to build and upload the new sword debs next week after I get back from Germany. Regards, Daniel From: Rob French [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/02/28 Fri AM 01:49:23 GMT To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [sword-devel] Debian

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Martin Gruner
Could you do an ldd diatheke? mg Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 14:39 schrieb Darin Duphorne: As you can see here: OPTIONS=--prefix=/usr OPTIONS=--disable-shared $OPTIONS OPTIONS=--without-conf $OPTIONS OPTIONS=--sysconfdir=/etc $OPTIONS #OPTIONS=--with-vcl $OPTIONS OPTIONS=--enable-debug

[sword-devel] Web Interface Project Name

2003-02-28 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
Can we give the web interface a cool sounding project name? :) by grace alone, Don A. Elbourne Jr. http://elbourne.org ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel

[sword-devel] Web Interface - Customization

2003-02-28 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
I've been asking around about web based Bible study tools. what people like, don't like, want, need, wish for, etc. The biggest request I am hearing is for customization. Since most of the online tools have the same content, the thing that is most lacking across the board is customization and

Re: [sword-devel] Diatheke -k modlist

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: Is it possible to use the modlist in Diatheke to return the language and locked status of each module? No. You could add this to the program, I guess, but it complicates things and is partially beyond the scope of the program's intent. If a

Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface Project Name

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: Can we give the web interface a cool sounding project name? :) How about Codename: Macceketh? Or Sword-web? Or The Sword Project for the Web? --Chris ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [sword-devel] Diatheke -k modlist

2003-02-28 Thread Don A. Elbourne Jr.
No problem. I was just curious. If it was there, I could have used it for something, but not essential. by grace alone, Don A. Elbourne Jr. http://elbourne.org - Original Message - From: Chris Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 11:48 AM

Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface - Customization

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: I'm guessing that the ability to save preferences across sessions will require a user/login type of system where the preferences will be able to be saved in a database. Is this doable? Logins and server-side storage of setting adds a lot of

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Darin Duphorne
I have gotten it to work, now, but I had to manually use the option --disable-shared from the make command. I never had to do that before, and I'm not sure why. On another note, the text has continued to include non-printable characters, as below. I don't know if it's from the original

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Darin Duphorne
I'm sorry -- I assumed that userinst.sh was called by configure. I see now that this is an alternative to running ./configure. Hopefully, this will help someone else. My confusion, though, is that I never used userinst.sh before and didn't have this problem. But, then again, I was using

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Martin Gruner
This might not be sword related. Please send the output of ldd diatheke. mg Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 15:18 schrieb Martin Gruner: Could you do an ldd diatheke? mg Am Freitag, 28. Februar 2003 14:39 schrieb Darin Duphorne: As you can see here: OPTIONS=--prefix=/usr

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Darin Duphorne wrote: On another note, the text has continued to include non-printable characters, as below. I don't know if it's from the original source, or whether this is a problem with the text output methods. John 15:16: Christ's Love to His Disciples.

Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface - Customization

2003-02-28 Thread Rev. Michael Paul Johnson
At 11:08 28-02-03 -0700, you wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: I'm guessing that the ability to save preferences across sessions will require a user/login type of system where the preferences will be able to be saved in a database. Is this doable? Logins and server-side

Re: [sword-devel] Web Interface - Customization

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Rev. Michael Paul Johnson wrote: What diatheke currently does (and what would be my recommendation) is just set cookies on the client. Nothing is required of the server maintainer. If people disable cookies, the have to live without these features. The only real

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Darin Duphorne
I'm afraid OSX doesn't include the Linux ldd tool. Do you know of a similar tool that bsd/osx systems might have? On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 08:18 AM, Martin Gruner wrote: Could you do an ldd diatheke? mg ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Darin Duphorne
So, is there not a way to output these texts in a way that maintains the spacing and line breaks? RTF looks pretty good, but I have to open it in a GUI text editor and can't run rtf through enscript for printing. On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 03:25 PM, Chris Little wrote: On Fri, 28 Feb

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Darin Duphorne
I'd love to, but have no ldd. Is there another tool that I might have? On Friday, February 28, 2003, at 02:23 PM, Martin Gruner wrote: This might not be sword related. Please send the output of ldd diatheke. mg ___ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Darin Duphorne
EUREKA!!! otool -L is a substitute for ldd. [ibook:~/source/sword] darin% otool -L /usr/local/bin/diatheke /usr/local/bin/diatheke: /usr/lib/libz.1.1.3.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.1.3) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current

Re: [sword-devel] CVS COMPILES!

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Darin Duphorne wrote: So, is there not a way to output these texts in a way that maintains the spacing and line breaks? RTF looks pretty good, but I have to open it in a GUI text editor and can't run rtf through enscript for printing. You could try Plaintext or

Re: [sword-devel] Webster's 1828 Dictionary

2003-02-28 Thread David's Mailing-list and Spam Receiver
On Thursday 27 February 2003 11:53 pm, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote: Does anyone know where we can get a copy of the Webster's 1828 Dictionary? I know there is a module for the 1913 version, but it would be cool to have the 1828. A lot of people have been asking about the 1828. What's

[sword-devel] Bugs in mod2OSIS

2003-02-28 Thread Simon
Title: Bericht Hi, I am currently creating a PHP script for a website, using OSIS texts. Now I use mod2osis to convert Sword modules to OSIS-text, so I can use them with my PHP-script. But, I found some bugs in mod2osis (I downloaden the latest (compiled) version from ftp.crosswire.org)

Re: [sword-devel] Webster's 1828 Dictionary

2003-02-28 Thread Chris Little
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, David's Mailing-list and Spam Receiver wrote: A lot of people have been asking about the 1828. What's different/better about it than the 1913 which seems to be a standard among dictionaries? The 1828 edition was written by Webster himself. I put written in quotes because