The forums are now setup. Please have a look and tell me if there are any
oddities (strange colors, hard to read text, references to "mvnForum" that
you think should refer to "The SWORD Project Forums", etc.).
--Chris
___
sword-devel mailing list
[E
Ok guys, I have a new CE binary ready for testing. Did some debugging
on the KJV that indeed wasn't showing up, and found that we were
returning null occasionally from XMLTag::getName() -- must have invalid
markup. So, we must check for .getName() == null first before sending
it to strcmp.
h
Hello
On Friday, 23. Januar 2004 22:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Because? Does that mean ever, or because 1.6 or 2.0 is coming?
> I've no complaints about 1.5.6, but thought that might be the source of the
> problem. Now I don't understand if you're saying there is no future
> version of Sword
<>
Does that mean there is known to be a problem in this passage? As I noted, it is text
that is there, since search finds it.
<>
Because? Does that mean ever, or because 1.6 or 2.0 is coming?
I've no complaints about 1.5.6, but thought that might be the source of the problem.
Now I don't u
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Lynn Allan wrote:
> Hi sword-develop'ers,
>
> I have been eagerly awaiting availability of the mvnForum. My impression is
> that a prototype was installed several months ago to gain experience, with
> general availability to possibly follow based on experience.
>
> I just ch
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering.
>
> When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using the
> Sword program (version 1.5.6; when will we see a compiled 1.5.7
> released?) I get ... nothing. This means that in a parallel
Hi sword-develop'ers,
I have been eagerly awaiting availability of the mvnForum. My impression is
that a prototype was installed several months ago to gain experience, with
general availability to possibly follow based on experience.
I just checked the previous URL
http://www.crosswire.org/forums
Hi sword-devel'opers,
I was authoring a TWiki page as a "place-holder" for a LcdBible link, and
noticed the "Topic Classification" drop-down for TWiki authoring. This had
intriguing entries for "NoDisclosure", "PublicSupported", and "PublicFAQ"
If memory serves, these categories seem new since th
I asked a while ago - I'm still wondering.
When I try to look up anything past Matthew 16:15 in the WEB using the Sword program
(version 1.5.6; when will we see a compiled 1.5.7 released?) I get ... nothing.
This means that in a parallel passage (say KJV+WEB) it won't show anything past MT
