FYI, due to someone asking in the sword-support list last evening, I
produced a module TrainTwelve of A.B.Bruce's 1871 work.
In my repo: host ftp.kleinpaste.org, directory /pub/sword.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.cr
On Nov 8, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Looking around the rest of the beta modules' status page, I have 2
> observations.
>
> 1. All of MacSword, BibleDesktop, and GnomeSword are given this
> demerit:
>
> | Does not handle WoC when milestoned quotes are used: | who="Jesus" sID="
Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Karl, AFAIK the problem is fully addressed in osis2mod and resolved.
Thanx. Then the page should be updated to reflect that this problem in
3 major UIs is not actually a problem any more, but is at worst pending
a planned fix.
__
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Looking around the rest of the beta modules' status page, I have 2
> observations.
>
> 1. All of MacSword, BibleDesktop, and GnomeSword are given this demerit:
>
> | Does not handle WoC when milestoned quotes are used: | who="Jesus" sID="x"/>Words of Christ
>
> I sugges
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Looking around the rest of the beta modules' status page, I have 2
> observations.
>
> 1. All of MacSword, BibleDesktop, and GnomeSword are given this demerit:
>
> | Does not handle WoC when milestoned quotes are used: | who="Jesus" sID="x"/>Words of Christ
>
> I sugges
Looking around the rest of the beta modules' status page, I have 2
observations.
1. All of MacSword, BibleDesktop, and GnomeSword are given this demerit:
| Does not handle WoC when milestoned quotes are used: Words of Christ
I suggest that if 3 of the major UIs are getting something wrong, it's
See http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Sitemap
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Talk:Sitemap
-- David
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> DM Smith wrote:
>> I mentioned in the last post that I posted a site map. Here it is again.
>>
>> By the way, I never did create a functional map
On Nov 8, 2008, at 8:22 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I believe that GnomeSword was the only front-end project that used it
>> as a whiteboard for planning. For whatever reason, that activity has
>> been moved out of the CrossWire wiki.
>
> [*blink*]
>
> Whe
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> A year or couple of years I think
>
> If there's usage of the wiki for GnomeSword whiteboarding in the last
> year or two, I certainly don't find it.
I was referring to the existence of the wiki not anything GS related.
Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A year or couple of years I think
If there's usage of the wiki for GnomeSword whiteboarding in the last
year or two, I certainly don't find it.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http:/
As seen in
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Modules_in_the_beta_repository
| in GS occ UTF8 problem - Mal 1:9 and Matt1:20 create
| odd characters (star in front of SEIGNEUR or DIEU
| (skc> this is intentional))
I just reproduced this bug to see what the problem is. It is not a
GnomeSword
DM Smith wrote:
> I mentioned in the last post that I posted a site map. Here it is again.
>
> By the way, I never did create a functional map as I thought I might.
I added it to the Wiki
>
> -- DM
>
> On Mar 31, 2008, at 6:43 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>
>> The following is a rough draft of a sitem
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I believe that GnomeSword was the only front-end project that used it
>> as a whiteboard for planning. For whatever reason, that activity has
>> been moved out of the CrossWire wiki.
>
> [*blink*]
>
> When/where was that? How long
I mentioned in the last post that I posted a site map. Here it is again.
By the way, I never did create a functional map as I thought I might.
-- DM
On Mar 31, 2008, at 6:43 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> The following is a rough draft of a sitemap of CrossWire.org. If you
> poke around, I'm sure you'll
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe that GnomeSword was the only front-end project that used it
> as a whiteboard for planning. For whatever reason, that activity has
> been moved out of the CrossWire wiki.
[*blink*]
When/where was that? How long has the wiki existed?
_
Brian J. Dumont wrote:
> David Troidl wrote:
>
>> Brian J. Dumont wrote:
>>
>>> So I've been updating some genbooks modules per comments from the
>>> beta tests. I think I've come across an error in either the DTD or
>>> the documentation for ThML. The problem has to do with citation
>>>
Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Description: [a short English language description]
> Description_de: [eine kurze Beschreibung auf Deutsch]
> How and when frontends will make use of this is a separate matter, but
> right now I think we should simply agree on this convention and the
On Nov 8, 2008, at 4:50 AM, Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> Matthew Talbert wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Chris Little
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Note that the links on the main page of the Wiki are intended for
>>> links
>>> to development Wikis ONLY. I know there are links to
Chris,
You wrote this quite a while ago:
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> This kind of announcement really raises in my mind the question "How
> much does a piece of software require to be listed on the CrossWire
> pages as a project? (such as on the main CrossWire page and the Wiki
> sidebar)" Not all i
Matthew Talbert wrote:
>> The link to BibleStudy's page is still current. The first two links on
>> the left make this clear.
>
> How is software 3 years old, that more than likely is incompatible
> with today's sword, still current? If the project owner has lost
> interest, who is going to requ
Chris Little wrote:
> Additions/changes to the main page are made at the request of project
> maintainers. To have a new project listed on the main CrossWire page, we
> need simply be given a blurb and a screenshot.
This mechanism does not work as desired and is overly buerocratic.
> The link
> The link to BibleStudy's page is still current. The first two links on
> the left make this clear.
How is software 3 years old, that more than likely is incompatible
with today's sword, still current? If the project owner has lost
interest, who is going to request that the blurb be changed? Read
Matthew Talbert wrote:
> Then it appears that the wiki is responding to a need in the community
> to allow more people to edit this content, as the content in the pages
> you mention is in some cases extremely out of date. For example, there
> is a link to BibleStudy which had active development
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Chris Little wrote:
>
>> Using the Wiki to perform collaborative document editing, as with the
>> FAQ or the Eee guide, is great. But the Wiki isn't the main CrossWire
>> page, nor its public face.
>
> And yet it is the by far most uptodate part of the website and, g
> The main pages (www.crosswire.org and www.crosswire.org/sword) are where
> most user-oriented material should go, including blurbs about & links to
> software using Sword. It's inconsistent to have half of the software
> links on the main page linking within the Wiki and half linking to
> off-sit
Chris Little wrote:
> Using the Wiki to perform collaborative document editing, as with the
> FAQ or the Eee guide, is great. But the Wiki isn't the main CrossWire
> page, nor its public face.
And yet it is the by far most uptodate part of the website and, given
the mess on the rest of the site
Matthew Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Note that the links on the main page of the Wiki are intended for links
>> to development Wikis ONLY. I know there are links to project pages as
>> well, but those are more properly placed within
A while back we discussed, but I am not too clear on the final outcome -
the wiki certainly does not reflect what I remember - the idea of
adding internationalised content into the module configuration file.
My suggestion is that we move this now forward and in the following form:
At least Descr
Matthew Talbert wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:19 PM, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Note that the links on the main page of the Wiki are intended for links
>> to development Wikis ONLY. I know there are links to project pages as
>> well, but those are more properly placed within th
29 matches
Mail list logo
