Re: [sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Quoting DM Smith : I like your suggestion. Give that CC are legal licenses, it appears that this summary is complete, perhaps drafted by lawyers :0 The problem with it is that it's too long. I don't want to give a legally correct statement, only a short and easily understandable statement

Re: [sword-devel] dirent.[ch]: licence/copyright issues

2009-04-23 Thread Gregory Hellings
On Apr 24, 2009, at 1:27, Jonathan Marsden wrote: Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that this copyright and permissions notice appear in all copies and

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Compatibility break: Sword 1.6RC1->RC2 API change

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Quoting "Troy A. Griffitts" : Thanks for the support and I understand the criticisms. Let me just say that the one difference here is that we are talking about a 1.6.x BRANCH in which NO API changes can be made once it happens. It is this point that is weighing heavier on the decision to make

[sword-devel] dirent.[ch]: licence/copyright issues

2009-04-23 Thread Jonathan Marsden
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: >>> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its >>> documentation for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided >>> that this copyright and permissions notice appear in all copies and >>> derivatives, and that no charge may be mad

[sword-devel] ftplib.c licence/copyright issues

2009-04-23 Thread Jonathan Marsden
>> src/utilfuns/ftplib.c: UNKNOWN Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > It's LGPL v2+ with Incorrect FSF address. > > Attaching a patch: ... I think patching is an incorrect approach to this. Only the copyright holder can change the copyright of their code. Patching a copyright notice in packaging is, mo

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
DM, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:50 PM, DM Smith wrote: > Greg, > This is close, but I think a few changes are needed to satisify Mac users: > 1)The name should consistently be BibleTime, In the title bar it is > bibletime (all lower case). (This shoule be easily fixed.) I don't have write access

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues

2009-04-23 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: 2009/4/24 Dmitrijs Ledkovs : 2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : One quick first impression: there are still a few files in the RC2 tarball that  licencecheck -r *  src/modules/common/sapphire.cpp: *No copyright* UNKNOWN last ema

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread DM Smith
Greg, This is close, but I think a few changes are needed to satisify Mac users: 1)The name should consistently be BibleTime, In the title bar it is bibletime (all lower case). (This shoule be easily fixed.) 2) There should be an application icon. (This should be easily fixed. However, Macs

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
DM, On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:59 PM, DM Smith wrote: > I've attached a png showing how it appears. I'm not a user of BT, so I can > only guess that some icons are not showing up: That's exactly what I would suspect it looks like. I've located the necessary Qt plugins (for those interested, on O

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues (was: SWORD 1.6.0RC2)

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/24 Ben Morgan > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs < > dmitrij.led...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : >> > One quick first impression: there are still a few files in the RC2 >> tarball >> > that >> > >> > licencecheck -r * >> > >> > src/modules/commo

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues (was: SWORD 1.6.0RC2)

2009-04-23 Thread Ben Morgan
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > 2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : > > One quick first impression: there are still a few files in the RC2 > tarball > > that > > > > licencecheck -r * > > > > src/modules/common/sapphire.cpp: *No copyright* UNKNOWN > > /* > > Implementatio

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues (was: SWORD 1.6.0RC2)

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/24 Dmitrijs Ledkovs : > 2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : >> One quick first impression: there are still a few files in the RC2 tarball >> that >> >>  licencecheck -r * >> >>  src/modules/common/sapphire.cpp: *No copyright* UNKNOWN > last email is about src/utilfuns/win32/dirent.cpp: UNKNOWN n

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues (was: SWORD 1.6.0RC2)

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : > One quick first impression: there are still a few files in the RC2 tarball > that > >  licencecheck -r * > >  src/modules/common/sapphire.cpp: *No copyright* UNKNOWN /* Implementation of POSIX directory browsing functions and types for Win32. Kevlin Henney (m

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues (was: SWORD 1.6.0RC2)

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : > > One quick first impression: there are still a few files in the RC2 tarball > that > >  licencecheck -r * > > complains about.  Excluding the zlib ones, it finds: > >  src/utilfuns/zlib/untgz.c: *No copyright* UNKNOWN > This file is shipped by the upstream (zlib) in

[sword-devel] osis2mod test cases

2009-04-23 Thread DM Smith
I've started a page in the wiki for problems that osis2mod has for valid, good OSIS. You can get to the page here: http://crosswire.org/wiki/Osis2mod_testcases Please feel free to improve the page as well. Please add complete fragments, demonstrating the problem, that I can copy into a test

Re: [sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread DM Smith
I like your suggestion. Give that CC are legal licenses, it appears that this summary is complete, perhaps drafted by lawyers :0 -- DM On Apr 23, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: 2009/4/24 DM Smith : I appreciate and understand that we (myself included) don' like it when free/Fr

Re: [sword-devel] Remaining licence/copyright issues (was: SWORD 1.6.0RC2)

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/22 Jonathan Marsden : >  licencecheck -r * > > complains about.  Excluding the zlib ones, it finds: > >  src/utilfuns/ftplib.c: UNKNOWN It's LGPL v2+ with Incorrect FSF address. Attaching a patch: After this patch is applied licencecheck reports: $ licensecheck src/utilfuns/ftplib.c src/

Re: [sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/24 DM Smith : > > I appreciate and understand that we (myself included) don' like it when > free/Free software is sold, especially when it is our effort, but the GPL > clearly allows for that. Even we can do that! Totally agree > The GLP requires that the user be told that the software sou

Re: [sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread DM Smith
On Apr 23, 2009, at 7:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: 2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen "BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and use (but not distribute) the program for personal, private, public or commercial purposes without restrictions.You can give away or distribute

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
I've now uploaded a version that doesn't require DBus. Oddly - when I move my /opt directory (where my development headers, libraries, etc are) out of its original location for testing, the SVG icons don't display. But when /opt is in place, they do. So odds are you won't be able to see icons if

Re: [sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > > > 2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen >> >> "BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and use (but >> not distribute) the program for personal, private, public or commercial >> purposes without restrictions.You can give away or

Re: [sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
2009/4/23 Eeli Kaikkonen > "BibleTime is released under the GPL licence.You can download and use (but > not distribute) the program for personal, private, public or commercial > purposes without restrictions.You can give away or distribute the program if > you also distribute the corresponding so

Re: [sword-devel] linking / testsuite

2009-04-23 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Additional wishlist for autotools / waf in relation to testsuite. Add --with-shtests (or replace --with-tests) configure flags With those flags above $make check (or waf check) should run a non-failing test-suite (sh, cppunit, sh & cppunit, sh & subset of cppunit). Currently --with-tests & make

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
DM, Thanks - obviously the crash is somewhere in DBus. I'm not certain what DBus is, but I know what it isn't: native to Macs. BibleTime doesn't seem to need it at all, since we don't have it on Windows and we can get along without it. I'll ask the BT team if possibly we can remove the dependen

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread DM Smith
On Apr 23, 2009, at 6:57 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: I've rebuilt the BibleTime for Mac distribution. It should be up on http://www.crosswire.org/~ghellings/bibletime/BibleTime_Mac_Beta.dmg This time it's a standard Drag 'n' Drop installer, and all the files required *should* be included in the

Re: [sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
Oops, I think that version wasn't able to see its .svg files. I'm uploading a repackaged version that can. --Greg On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: > I've rebuilt the BibleTime for Mac distribution.  It should be up on > http://www.crosswire.org/~ghellings/bibletime/BibleTim

[sword-devel] Mac build

2009-04-23 Thread Greg Hellings
I've rebuilt the BibleTime for Mac distribution. It should be up on http://www.crosswire.org/~ghellings/bibletime/BibleTime_Mac_Beta.dmg This time it's a standard Drag 'n' Drop installer, and all the files required *should* be included in the Application Bundle. If you're on a PPC Mac, I don't t

Re: [sword-devel] Soft hyphens?

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
David Haslam wrote: Which SWORD frontends (if any) correctly handle the soft hyphen (U+00AD) to break up big words when necessary? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen#Hyphens_in_computing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen#Hyphens_in_computing "When flowing text, a system may consider t

[sword-devel] Soft hyphens?

2009-04-23 Thread David Haslam
Which SWORD frontends (if any) correctly handle the soft hyphen (U+00AD) to break up big words when necessary? See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen#Hyphens_in_computing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyphen#Hyphens_in_computing "When flowing text, a system may consider the soft hyphen to be a

[sword-devel] Notice in licence agreement

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Would it be good idea to put a notice with licence agreement in each frontend which says that "this software can be obtained with no cost, if you have paid a large sum you may have been fooled"? Usually applications have an About dialog. It could be put there. More importantly, it could be inc

Re: [sword-devel] OSIS looks daunting. Can I import from existing VPL format?

2009-04-23 Thread David Haslam
Hello John, Looks like it would be good for you to make contact with Craig Ledbetter in Ballincolllig, Co. Cork, in connection with his http://www.biblebc.com/Projects/irish_new_testament_project.htm Irish New Testament Project . The CrossWire wiki mentions this here http://www.crosswire.org/wi

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Quoting Matthew Talbert : We also use InstallMgr without subclassing. Frankly, I don't see how the virtual method will make it any more likely that frontends will prompt the user. We already warn the user, so having this method at all seems redundant. I think the idea is that the library can

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Quoting Manfred Bergmann : I didn't actually have seen a reason yet to subclass it. Why do you subclass InstallMgr? Because I can :) To be serious, it's nothing more than a design decision which could have been done otherwise. Maybe it will be changed one day. BibleTime doesn't have one g

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 23.04.2009 um 11:14 schrieb Eeli Kaikkonen: Quoting Manfred Bergmann : So I need to subclass InstallMgr now? Hmm, not sure I like it, means more code an an additional class just to return a true here. This is what I tried to explain in an earlier post. I didn't know that people use

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 23.04.2009 um 11:08 schrieb Troy A. Griffitts: Manfred Bergmann wrote: I noticed the setUserDisclaimerConfirmed(bool) has been removed. How can I set this now? So I need to subclass InstallMgr now? Hmm, not sure I like it, means more code an an additional class just to return a true here

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Quoting "Troy A. Griffitts" : I understand it is easier to just setUserDislaimerConfirmed(true), but this better assures that the frontend developers actually present something to the user-- or they are really going out of their way to NOT present something to the user if they overload this meth

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Matthew Talbert
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 6:14 AM, Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: > Quoting Manfred Bergmann : > >> So I need to subclass InstallMgr now? >> Hmm, not sure I like it, means more code an an additional class just to >> return a true here. > > This is what I tried to explain in an earlier post. I didn't know tha

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Quoting Manfred Bergmann : So I need to subclass InstallMgr now? Hmm, not sure I like it, means more code an an additional class just to return a true here. This is what I tried to explain in an earlier post. I didn't know that people use instmgr without subclassing. Now when they do, it's b

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Manfred Bergmann wrote: I noticed the setUserDisclaimerConfirmed(bool) has been removed. How can I set this now? So I need to subclass InstallMgr now? Hmm, not sure I like it, means more code an an additional class just to return a true here. Dear Manfred, My apologies for the inconvenience

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 23.04.2009 um 10:29 schrieb Manfred Bergmann: Am 21.04.2009 um 16:24 schrieb Troy A. Griffitts: Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: Unfortunately I have to destroy your hope here: we have only the static warning which doesn't have to be agreed. But I have already planned replacing it with a dynamic

Re: [sword-devel] [bt-devel] Bibletime 2.0.alpha3 FTBFS with sword 1.6.0RC1 library

2009-04-23 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 21.04.2009 um 16:24 schrieb Troy A. Griffitts: Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: Unfortunately I have to destroy your hope here: we have only the static warning which doesn't have to be agreed. But I have already planned replacing it with a dynamic warning. There is virtual int refreshRemoteSource

Re: [sword-devel] linking / testsuite

2009-04-23 Thread Martin Zibricky
Hi, is there any chance that linking / testsuite will run on Windows? Martin Zibricky ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at abo

[sword-devel] OSIS commentary problem

2009-04-23 Thread Matthew Talbert
I'm working on a commentary in OSIS, and I have an issue. It seems to be related to having more than one per . In this case, I have two 's like so: some content some more content Everything is fine up to and including the two . But afterwards, there is no content in the commentary at all, and