On 1/3/2013 12:30 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
I should add that prior to doing anything I did check the isv.conf file
which says this:
DistributionLicense=Copyrighted; Permission to distribute granted to
CrossWire
From .conf file at least, any reasonable person would conclude that
permission had a
On Thursday, January 3, 2013, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 18:51 -0500, Andrew Thule wrote:
>
> Resistance comes about when someone with a severe case of stubbornness
> ignores being told that a particular "contribution" is not desired, not
> asked for nor even legal. Cases in p
On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 18:51 -0500, Andrew Thule wrote:
> Have you read [James 2:13]? It's not clear why the hostility, but I'm
> trying to contribute here (albeit with lots of resistance).
Resistance comes about when someone with a severe case of stubbornness
ignores being told that a particul
On 04/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> The only repository not for general public use is not listed in
> masterRepoList.conf, and that's the experimental repository.
>
> The attic repositories are definitely intended for the public to use. If
> users care to, they can downgrade fro
Peter,
Have you read [James 2:13]? It's not clear why the hostility, but I'm
trying to contribute here (albeit with lots of resistance).
If there's some secret handshake, application form, or process other than
signing up on this list that helps transition folks from being outsiders to
being ins
On 03/01/13 19:56, Andrew Thule wrote:
If others feel as you do, that outside contributions are
unwelcome here - I will kick the sand from my sandals and leave
I will correct that...
On 03/01/13 1956 Andrew Thule should have written:
> If others feel as you do, that my contributions are
> unw
On 03/01/13 20:46, Andrew Thule wrote:
If there are prohibitions against distributions of newer revisions of
the text, this needs to be documented somewhere; for how else will
volunteers know they are restricted to working with particular versions
of text?
You are no CrossWire volunteer.
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02.01.2013 09:22, Nic Carter wrote:
> Thanks for these.
>
> Hopefully some kind soul will apply them?
When I first posted the patches I thought I'll wait until 2013 before
taking any further steps. But it has been a very busy time for me and
possi
By and large, we use the upstream source for a text without modifying it at
all. If we find errors or problems, we feed them back upstream. This benefits
everyone, not just us.
When a source is not copyrighted, we look for the best source we can find. When
it is copyrighted we get it from the p
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
> I just thought about this a bit more .. I suppose that's what "Version=1.5"
> is for ...
No, the Copyright limitation applies to the source material. It's very
possible that multiple versions of the module could be made from the
same initial s
If there are prohibitions against distributions of newer revisions of the
text, this needs to be documented somewhere; for how else will volunteers
know they are restricted to working with particular versions of text?
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
> I just thought abou
I just thought about this a bit more .. I suppose that's what "Version=1.5"
is for ...
Nevermind.
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification DM.
> Perhaps for the sake of clarity then, the .conf file's
> "DistributionLicense=" attribute could contain
Thanks for the clarification DM.
Perhaps for the sake of clarity then, the .conf file's
"DistributionLicense=" attribute could contain the version for which
permission was granted (rather than appearing to be generic).
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 3:35 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> I can see how you migh
This site wasn't on my radar, but I find it very useful:
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository#Commentary_Modules
Many of these (well documented) issues appear easily fixed. For example
the 'emptyvss' issues are likely simple problems to fix. It appears the
purpose of this pag
I can see how you might conclude that.
However, when we get permission for a copyrighted work, we get permission for
that copyright. If the work is updated, there is a new copyright and we have to
obtain permission for that.
In Him,
DM
On Jan 3, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
I should add that prior to doing anything I did check the isv.conf file
which says this:
DistributionLicense=Copyrighted; Permission to distribute granted to
CrossWire
>From .conf file at least, any reasonable person would conclude that
permission had already been obtained to distribute (and redi
Come now Peter, don't be so quick to find fault.
The Crosswire repository currently contains version 1.5 of the ISV module.
Nic's question was asking about the inclusion of the OT in that module.
The Crosswire site doesn't say anything about the status of this module,
and Nic's question seems to s
Andrew, this is now quite enough. Please desist posting further onto our list.
Your presence is undesired
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Andrew Thule"
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Subject: [sword-devel] ISV status?
Date: Thu, Jan 3, 2013 18:53
Done.
I made it
Once (if?) you obtain permission to distribute, please let the list know so
that volunteers can continue to move this effort forward. (Conversion from
a Word document may no longer be necessary).
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
> I guess that answers the question posed b
I guess that answers the question posed by Nic then ..
These efforts are apparently on hold pending permission to distribute.
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Thule wrote:
> Done.
>
> I made it available here only in response to this request ..
>
> ~A
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:2
Done.
I made it available here only in response to this request ..
~A
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> Andrew, this document is copyrighted. We do not have permission to
> distribute it. You certainly and absolutely do not have permission to
> distribute it, much less to
Andrew, this document is copyrighted. We do not have permission to
distribute it. You certainly and absolutely do not have permission to
distribute it, much less to distribute it and claim that we have
permission to distribute it.
Remove it immediately.
--Chris
On 1/3/2013 9:37 AM, Andrew T
On 03/01/13 13:04, Chris Little wrote:
I would suggest that you quit presenting CrossWire Beta as "CrossWire
2". I know Apple doesn't want 'beta' showing up in the delivered app,
but I presume you can sidestep this by loading from masterRepoList.conf.
I would second that. Beta was meant to be
I believe there's an OSIS file that contains both testaments ... I can
forward it if it helps this effort.
There are least two versification problems (I haven't bothered to address
yet)
INFO(V11N): 1Sam.11 is not in the KJV versification. Appending content to
1Sam.10.27
INFO(V11N): Rev.13 is not i
On 1/3/2013 4:03 AM, Nic Carter wrote:
On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta
repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content
that was reasonably good has long been moved to oth
On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta
> repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content
> that was reasonably good has long been moved to other repositories. So the
> content r
26 matches
Mail list logo
