They developed the numbering system for the NIV concordance. See
http://www.amazon.com/Exhaustive-Bible-Concordance-Third-Edition/dp/0310262933
David
On 2/2/2016 1:25 PM, David Haslam wrote:
Anyone know what are Goodrick-Kohlenberger numbers?
David
--
View this message in context:
Anyone know what are Goodrick-Kohlenberger numbers?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Goodrick-Kohlenberger-numbers-tp4655952.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
On 02/02/2016 01:25 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> Anyone know what are Goodrick-Kohlenberger numbers?
An intended replacement for Strong's numbers. But it was done for NIV
(at least initially) and Zondervan copyrighted the system, leading to
others' lack of interest in using a new, restricted,
On 02/02/2016 08:25 AM, David Haslam
wrote:
Anyone know what are Goodrick-Kohlenberger numbers?
According to
http://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/20024/what-do-the-goodrick-kohlenberger-numbers-represent-what-features-does-this-s,
Does anyone know what the attached glyph is called? It is used with a following
c. to mean etc. I’d like to see if it is in Unicode.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Hi DM,
That's an ampersand i.e. &
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%26c.
Thanks,
Ben
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 3:34 PM DM Smith wrote:
> Does anyone know what the attached glyph is called? It is used with a
> following c. to mean etc. I’d like to see if it is in Unicode.
>
>
Thanks. In the document there are typical looking ampersands. This one threw me
for a loop.
I found it in Baskerville Italic.
> On Feb 2, 2016, at 11:35 PM, Ben Morgan wrote:
>
> Hi DM,
>
> That's an ampersand i.e. &
> https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%26c
On 02/02/2016 08:45 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> we might find this Name as an exception, Phœbe Phebe
grep -la ^DataPath.*texts * | xargs grep -a '^\[' | tr -d '\r]' | cut
-f2 -d[ | while read name ; do diatheke -b $name -f Plain -k rom.16.1 ;
done | egrep -A1 -i '(ph|f).*be[ ,]
and then massage
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016 02:56:37 -0800 (PST)
David Haslam wrote:
>
> "...some texts have ligatures directly converted to regular letters, others
> have not. "
>
> to which I may add the observation (for some French texts) that some works
> have BOTH forms!
Here is a sample
FWIW, and for Windows users, the Unicode editor called BabelPad can strip
diacritics.
The option is found as: Menu | Convert | Other | Strip diacritics
It applies the change to selected text.
Regards,
David
http://www.babelstone.co.uk/Software/BabelPad.html
--
View this message in context:
Just so y'all know.
I just shot off a query to Andrew West at BabelStone. He replied promptly:
"No, there is no way to automatically do that in BabelPad because the
Unicode Standard does not define any relationship between (for
example) Æ æ Œ œ and AE ae OE oe. Although Æ includes "Letter" in
On Mon, 01 Feb 2016 08:06:03 +
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> I guess we might require a bunch of filters
I think we can build a filter for Latin based languages with different
sections specific to each language. Please find attached a patch
proposal for adding a Latin diacritics
Within Bibles at least, most if not all the words using "oe" or the ligature
"œ" are followed by either the letter "i" or the letter "u".
There are French words with other letters following, but less likely to be
found within a Biblical text.
e.g.
ŒcuménismeEcumenism
Œdipe Oedipus
Though we might find this Name as an exception,
Phœbe Phebe
e.g. In Romans 16. (I've not looked in every module, it's an exercise for
the pupil)
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Latin-diacritics-tp4655927p4655948.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev
14 matches
Mail list logo