Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc.
>
> E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being
> installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility,
> I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandl
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source
> of dominique.corbex.
> The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library
> which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version
> number).
> Any ideas
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source
> of dominique.corbex.
> The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library
> which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version
> number).
> Any ideas
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Am 10.11.2008 um 21:46 schrieb Chris Little:
>
>
>> The Wiki is just plain unattractive. We've got a fairly consistent
>> look
>> throughout the Sword, CrossWire, JSword, & other crosswire.org-hosted
>> sites. The Wiki is has an inconsistent and very plain appearance
Greg Hellings wrote:
> Jason,
>
>
>> On a related but lately ignored note, for a packager for any Linux
>> distro, what is the solution for the non conventional naming (versioning
>> really) of the library?
>>
>> It is: libsword-1.5.11.so when it should be something like
>> libsword-1.5.11.so.1
Daniel Owens wrote:
> Karl,
>
> When I tried using ./autogen.sh and ./usrinst.sh I came up with lots
> of errors that I couldn't find solutions to, but just using
> ./configure worked.
>
> Daniel
>
> Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>> Daniel Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> ./configure
>>> make
>
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Jason Galyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I am updating the Ubuntu sword package from 1.5.9 to the current 1.5.11.
>>
>> However, I noticed that libsword used to be libsword.so.6 whe
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> For comparison, under Fedora we have:
>
> [1096] [11:49 AM] awol:~> egrep ^sword\|^gnomesword\|^bibletime
> /var/log/rpmpkgs
> bibletime-1.6.5.1-1.fc9.i386.rpm
> gnomesword-2.4.0-1.fc9.i386.rpm
> sword-1.5.11-1.fc9.i386.rpm
> [1097] [11:50 AM] awol:~> ls -l /usr/lib/libswo
Hello,
I am updating the Ubuntu sword package from 1.5.9 to the current 1.5.11.
However, I noticed that libsword used to be libsword.so.6 whereas now it
is libsword-1.5.11.so
This does not 'play' nicely with the shlibs versioning and dependency
system for most linux systems that I am aware of.
reading over my emails I can see I did a very poor job of wording
My opinion over the choice of license for sword was never intended to be
conveyed. I personally am only concerned in the desired use of the
sofware from a "spirit" and "letter" of the law/license. From a more
legal perspective,
I appreciate you helping me clue in on this. Even better, I appreciate
you helping me understand the concerns, something a license by its
nature just can't really convey.
I think it is very important to honor your requests (the spirit) and not
just get by on technical loopholes (the letter).
4.140.154.250]
>> said:
>>550-Verification failed for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 550-Unrouteable
>> address 550
>>Sender verify failed (in reply to RCPT TO command)
>>
>>
>> Can you send it for me? Or tell me what I need to do to send it?
>>
>&
DM Smith wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> am I forced to
>> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
>> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
>>
>
> Only the serv
Thank you for being a voice of reason and self control.
There are valid issues for the protecting of work and the desire to
allow for wide dissemination that get burried under pagan trivia and
self serving agendas and rage.
My concern is that the portions I write not be viral. I am not really
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>
Chris Little wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
>> already
>> been answered but I am failing to find
On that subject
Free as in Freedom
Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has already
been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
Some believe the GPL to be restrictive and freedom destroying. What
about other open source licenses like the Python license for exam
Yes, handily there are virtual images available also for Parallels and QEMU.
Check out http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Developers/Setup for information for
developers.
Personally, I prefer to use the jhbuild (sugar-jhbuild) to get the
latest development goodies.
Let me know if you need any help sett
DJ Ortley wrote:
> Well, I'm not exactly sure of what you were trying to say in this
> e-mail. However, I suppose clarifying the typical Plone setup might be
> of use as I don't think you were trying to chide me away from developing
> such technologies as much as you were trying to bring to lig
to get sword stuck on the the laptops before they ship, which
>>> obviously isn't going to happen (and definatly weren't my original
>>> thoughts.)
>>>
>>> As I said, I'm still mildly interested, but I don't know how involved
>>> I can be in the
There were various conversations in the past relating to Bible related
software for the One Laptop Per Child or XO project. I would like to
start the discussion back up if anyone is interested.
At my local Python Users Group meeting (http://dfwpython.org) we had
three of the units and played a
There is always the possibility of dual licensing. A company could
obtain special permission to use a less restrictive license given that
certain requirements are met.
I personally have long been a supporter of the "ransom" model. When a
certain amount of time or income has been met the sourc
Python is used heavily in the OLPC software, so you do not need a
separate VM for squeak. I attended the US Python Conference (PyCon) and
heard a good discussion of OLPC's architecture. Python is used
everywhere on the system except for areas like Xorg where speed and
existing non-Python code
Any interest in testing this on Mono?
On 2/1/07, Richard Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm happy to announce that a pre-Alpha version of
SwordSharp has been release.
SwordSharp is my effort to create a .NET client for the Sword Project
modules. In version 0.1.1 you can vi
sounds great
thanks for your speedy and effective response
On 12/29/06, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Jason Galyon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My question begins with how to get biblical text or rather from where?
> Could I use a Sword module and mi
Hello,
I am about to undertake the task of writing a small web app that manages
scriptures (favorites, by book, etc) and presents an RSS feed of daily
scriptures of whatever category you have setup.
I do this mainly to get more experience in the language to be used (Python)
and a particular web t
26 matches
Mail list logo
