Re: [sword-devel] A few comments about 1.6.0-RC1

2009-04-14 Thread DM Smith
On Apr 13, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: Hi all! A few comments about the recent sword tarball. I haven't done any testing yet, just compiling =D. A new tool? List-missing gave this: -./usr/bin/vs2osisreftxt There files are

Re: [sword-devel] A few comments about 1.6.0-RC1

2009-04-13 Thread Deji Akingunola
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Hi all! > > > Sword fails to build with gcc-snapshot (the last ubuntu gcc-snapshot > is from January, I think, so it reflects gcc4.4). The build can be > fixed with this patch against svn 2322 (this has been reported by > debian gcc team

Re: [sword-devel] A few comments about 1.6.0-RC1

2009-04-13 Thread Greg Hellings
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Hi all! > > A few comments about the recent sword tarball. I haven't done any > testing yet, just compiling =D. > > A new tool? List-missing gave this: > -./usr/bin/vs2osisreftxt > > There files are present in the tarball. I'm wondering wh

[sword-devel] A few comments about 1.6.0-RC1

2009-04-13 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Hi all! A few comments about the recent sword tarball. I haven't done any testing yet, just compiling =D. A new tool? List-missing gave this: -./usr/bin/vs2osisreftxt There files are present in the tarball. I'm wondering whether they are still needed in svn and I don't think VCS specific files s