Re: [sword-devel] Fwd: Re: NASB status

2017-02-21 Thread Greg Hellings
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:09 PM, Matt Zabojnik wrote: > Troy, thank you for that. Quite a bit of thought has gone into this module > before me. > > I have a quick question, not in the form of a challenge, but rather a > humble request for understanding. For your three points,

Re: [sword-devel] Fwd: Re: NASB status

2017-02-21 Thread Matt Zabojnik
Troy, thank you for that. Quite a bit of thought has gone into this module before me. I have a quick question, not in the form of a challenge, but rather a humble request for understanding. For your three points, why is 1. important? Why is a scripted, reproducible method for transforming the

[sword-devel] Fwd: Re: NASB status

2017-02-21 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Reposting the below message from the last time we visited this. If you wish to see the conversation around this, have a look at the mailman archives here: http://www.crosswire.org/pipermail/sword-devel/2016-January/thread.html Forwarded Message Subject:Re: