Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Hi.
>
> What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
Ancillary texts - find a better word please, but I meant introductory
stuff , chapter 0 etc.
Verse Lists - this is search results (+/- manually created lists) which
can be used to work through a subject.
P
Hi.
What is meant by "Ancillary texts" and "Verse Lists"?
Manfred
Am 28.02.2009 um 04:59 schrieb Daniel Owens:
With DM's cautions/suggestions in mind, I created some content for
the page I suggested for the wiki (http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_Sword_Program
). I envision factual
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen
wrote:
> Quoting Geoffrey W Hasstings :
>
>> Do you have an idea when it will be available for test on windows vista.
>>
>>
>
> Greg H said he could do it Sunday evening. There exists already one package
> but the icons don't work and it crashes too
Quoting Geoffrey W Hasstings :
Do you have an idea when it will be available for test on windows vista.
Greg H said he could do it Sunday evening. There exists already one
package but the icons don't work and it crashes too much. We hope
these will be fixed in the next package.
--Eeli
Do you have an idea when it will be available for test on windows vista.
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:33:25 +0200 Eeli Kaikkonen
writes:
> Quoting Geoffrey W Hasstings :
>
> > Is there a version of BIBLE TIME for windows available?
> >
> >
>
> Yes and no. It has been built and run but doesn't work
Peter von Kaehne writes:
> I have just now added a colum GUI languages.
OK, but 2 things:
- The format has been mangled a bit, because you've put Read Aloud in
but it shows up under "Portable" :-)
- Dom will be annoyed that you left French off the GUI languages list.
__
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> My difficulty with the table layout is that it relegates "special
> features" to just a column on the right that will be very easy to
> overfill, to the point of making it unusable, unreadable. But it is
> exactly per-app special features that can determine which app has t
My difficulty with the table layout is that it relegates "special
features" to just a column on the right that will be very easy to
overfill, to the point of making it unusable, unreadable. But it is
exactly per-app special features that can determine which app has the
particular featurefulness th
Daniel Owens wrote:
With DM's cautions/suggestions in mind, I created some content for the page I
suggested for the wiki (http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_Sword_Program).
I envision factual informations about features, not value judgments. It is a
place to showcase the positive features
With DM's
cautions/suggestions in mind, I created some content for the page I
suggested for the wiki
(http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Choosing_a_Sword_Program). I envision
factual informations about features, not value judgments. It is a place
to showcase the positive features of each application
As someone who's used BibleCS since before there was a viable
alternative on Windows, I've seen applications arise for other
platforms, and the net. Until recently, there wasn't such a push to
establish the others on Windows, and I haven't tried most of them.
Basically, I've had something tha
On Feb 27, 2009, at 2:46 AM, Manfred Bergmann wrote:
Am 27.02.2009 um 02:02 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
2. Add a comparison table for desktop front-ends called "Which SWORD
application is right for me?" or something like that. I would be
happy
to contribute to this. It could include columns
All,
This is not in reply to any particular email, but a general statement.
I am afraid that I have used overly emotive words and said things in
haste that I might not have said if I had thought longer and harder.
It may also have appeared too hasty and jumped to conclusions too
fast: if so, that
Quoting Geoffrey W Hasstings :
Is there a version of BIBLE TIME for windows available?
Yes and no. It has been built and run but doesn't work yet completely.
I expect the most serious issues (crashes) to be solved soon, then it
would be ready for publishing and beta testing.
See http://d
Am 27.02.2009 um 02:02 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
2. Add a comparison table for desktop front-ends called "Which SWORD
application is right for me?" or something like that. I would be
happy
to contribute to this. It could include columns for OS's supported,
RtoL
support, localization, layout
I agree.
I am not a programmer but a user of the software.
CS Advantages
1.verse list feature
a. verse list will switch to what ever translation you have open. You
can print the same list in different languages with just a couple of
clicks.
I usually teach and preach from verse lists.
David,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:31 AM, David Troidl wrote:
> I'm coming late to this thread. But as a BibleCS user, though I haven't
> sampled all the alternatives, I am also using BPBible portable on my flash
> drive at school. I have to say there is no comparison. I stick by BibleCS.
I'm
Is there a version of BIBLE TIME for windows available?
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:02:32 +0200 Eeli Kaikkonen
writes:
> Quoting Jonathan Morgan :
>
> > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
> > wrote:
> >> Congratulations guys!!! This is great news! Our Windows users
> now have
> >>
I must not have the right
to create new pages on the wiki, so I will need someone to create one
for me to start working on what I proposed. It could be called "What
SWORD Application is Right for Me?".
Daniel
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Daniel Owens wrote:
This discussion about depre
Daniel Owens wrote:
> This discussion about deprecating BibleCS is no doubt fueled by the fact
> that it's name suggests it is THE flagship program for Windows. To be
> sure, for English (and other ascii-friendly languages) users, it is a
> feature rich alternative. However, given that it has limit
This discussion about deprecating BibleCS is no doubt fueled by the fact
that it's name suggests it is THE flagship program for Windows. To be
sure, for English (and other ascii-friendly languages) users, it is a
feature rich alternative. However, given that it has limitations with
regard to no
On Feb 26, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
I applaud Xiphos and BibleTime for coming to Windows. Each provides a
different way at approaching God's Word. Now we have 5 major,
supported
frontends for Windows that people can choose from! (I'm including
AlKitab)
But not, it appears
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> I applaud Xiphos and BibleTime for coming to Windows. Each provides a
>> different way at approaching God's Word. Now we have 5 major, supported
>> frontends for Windows that people can choose from! (I'm including AlKitab)
>
> But not, it appears, including BPBible, whic
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:49 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Congratulations guys!!! This is great news! Our Windows users now have
>>> choices 4+ choices! We're really going to have to redo our CD auto
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, DM Smith wrote:
> Most of the criticisms that I hear about BibleCS relate to how it looks,
> not what it does. I think Manfred's comment about people not developing
> for the Mac is true for Windows too. What developer has jumped in to
> improve BibleCS?
>
The used GUI toolkit
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
wrote:
Congratulations guys!!! This is great news! Our Windows users now have
choices 4+ choices! We're really going to have to redo our CD autorun
splash to present these choices to our users.
This is now t
Hello everyone,
I'm coming late to this thread. But as a BibleCS user, though I haven't
sampled all the alternatives, I am also using BPBible portable on my
flash drive at school. I have to say there is no comparison. I stick
by BibleCS.
Peace,
David
Am 26.02.2009 um 17:01 schrieb Mark Trompell:
Am Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:43:25 +
schrieb Manfred Bergmann :
I think even though many people have Macs nowadays, very few do
development on it. And then there is Objective-C and Interface
Builder which are languages tools only available to Mac. T
Am Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:43:25 +
schrieb Manfred Bergmann :
> I think even though many people have Macs nowadays, very few do
> development on it. And then there is Objective-C and Interface
> Builder which are languages tools only available to Mac. That makes
> it more difficult for people c
Am 26.02.2009 um 14:59 schrieb Eeli Kaikkonen:
Quoting Karl Kleinpaste :
Eeli Kaikkonen writes:
But if you allow me to go back to BibleTime - ... At the moment
we have less manpower than Xiphos have had for some time
To me, that's an extraordinary and peculiar claim, considering the
dear
Quoting Karl Kleinpaste :
Eeli Kaikkonen writes:
But if you allow me to go back to BibleTime - ... At the moment
we have less manpower than Xiphos have had for some time
To me, that's an extraordinary and peculiar claim, considering the
dearth of contributors (at least in SVN commits, other
Hi there
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
Without doubt it should be deprecated and stated
clearly as being utterly unsupported and moved down the list at least
as far as LCDBible.
First: congratulatiions to the BT team. For my part, I have not used
BibleCS since the Windows Xiphos. Now I ha
Eeli Kaikkonen writes:
> But if you allow me to go back to BibleTime - ... At the moment
> we have less manpower than Xiphos have had for some time
To me, that's an extraordinary and peculiar claim, considering the
dearth of contributors (at least in SVN commits, other than in interface
translat
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen
wrote:
> Quoting Jonathan Morgan :
>
>> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Congratulations guys!!! This is great news! Our Windows users now have
>>> choices 4+ choices! We're really going to have to redo our C
Quoting Jonathan Morgan :
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
wrote:
Congratulations guys!!! This is great news! Our Windows users now have
choices 4+ choices! We're really going to have to redo our CD autorun
splash to present these choices to our users.
This is now the t
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts
wrote:
> Congratulations guys!!! This is great news! Our Windows users now have
> choices 4+ choices! We're really going to have to redo our CD autorun
> splash to present these choices to our users.
This is now the time to consider again rem
36 matches
Mail list logo
