That looks nice, Tobias. Thanks to everyone who commented on this. I think we
do similar normalization in the engine for the lookup, but not in the search.
You'd know if the NASB on the the live swordweb site allows a word click at one
of these locations with a letter suffix and it still produce
On 7/16/20 4:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
On 7/15/20 5:08 PM, Tobias Klein wrote:
Is there any other translation out there that uses these special
Strong's keys?
I don't think any other uses the NAS lexicons. However, those are not
the only "not-Strong's Strong's". For example, there is the
One or more of the modules hosted by Tyndale House for STEP Bible makes use of
the TH augmented Strong’s numbers.
Some of these modules can be manually installed in other front-end apps.
AFAIK, TH has still not set up a proper repository that the SWORD module
manager could access, were the conn
On 7/15/20 5:08 PM, Tobias Klein wrote:
> Is there any other translation out there that uses these special
> Strong's keys?
I don't think any other uses the NAS lexicons. However, those are not
the only "not-Strong's Strong's". For example, there is the Berean
Bible (http://berean.bible) who have
On 7/15/20 1:23 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
On 7/15/20 2:15 AM, Tobias Klein wrote:
Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons
Actually, we (well, I) do...which is why I could explain your
difficulty, after all.
I just moved them from my private repo to the Xiphos repo. Feel free
to refr
On 7/15/20 2:15 AM, Tobias Klein wrote:
> Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons
Actually, we (well, I) do...which is why I could explain your
difficulty, after all.
I just moved them from my private repo to the Xiphos repo. Feel free to
refresh and install.
Troy and I discussed making th
Thanks, Karl. Makes sense now.
@Troy:
Since we don't have the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons, but just standard Strong's
keyed lexicons, would it make sense to "normalize" the way how Sword
searches in this case? Would it be correct to simply return all verses
that have either 5179a or 5179b? I guess th
On 7/14/20 4:09 PM, Tobias Klein wrote:
>
> The Strong's search does not return results if the Strong's numbers in
> the text point to a part of a verse.
>
No, it's because the Strong's numbers in NASB are keyed to their own
lexicons, the NAS Heb/Grk lexicons, which have multiple entries at 5179,
Hi all,
The Strong's search does not return results if the Strong's numbers in the text
point to a part of a verse.
Example: G5179
This should actually yield 15 results (according to Blue Letter Bible).
One example result is John 20:25. The source text in NASB contains this:
the imprint
Another e
