Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
Thank you, Martin. 1. Well, that is embarrassing. I'm glad you pointed that out. Rebuilding is in progress. That one affects a lot of modules. 2. I filled in the missing descriptions in the Haiola metadata. It will be in the conf files with the next rebuil

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
Lacking a compelling reason to do otherwise, I have removed spaRV1909 from the eBible.org sword repository. I haven't bothered encrypting any Sword modules, yet. I might do that for proprietary copyrighted Bibles in the future if that is what it takes

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Martin Denham
And Bible/JSword is reporting errors in some conf files: 1. In cta1981.conf and many others the extra trailing '*' obstructs line continuation: \* You must give Attribution to the work. \ \* You do not sell this work for a profit. \ \* 2. Many modules have no description e.g. kdc20

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread David Haslam
In fact, it was even worse than that. The installed module [spaRV1909] got corrupted due to the fact that the earlier module had not been first removed by Xiphos, as it would have done in the normal course of events. I have just manually removed the eBible module, and reinstalled the CrossWire mo

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread David Haslam
Michael, Your module [spaRV1909] has the same DataPath as the CrossWire module [SpaRV1909]. This name clash needs resolving asap, else other users will meet the same problem I just experienced. The fact that the first letter is lowercase in your module name is effectively ignored by the Xiphos m

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
g Hellings Sent: ‎02/‎09/‎2015 04:20 To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum Subject: Re: [sword-deve

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 09/02/2015 01:19 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote: > grcTisch (Tischendorf) > Version=2.9 > History_2.9=Automatically generated on 2015-09-01 from source files > dated 2014-01-11 Weakness: Still no variants, per source text (11 verses). Error: Morph content is present but there is no OSISMo

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
These are the latest versions at ftp://ftp.ebible.org/sword: engKJV1769 (KJVD) Version=8.1 History_8.1=Automatically generated on 2015-09-01 from source files dated 2015-08-31 spaRV1909 (RV1909) Version=2.11 History_2.11=Automatical

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread David Haslam
As would the majority of almost 700 eBible module that I did not install at first. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/eBible-org-repository-minor-tweak-tp4655171p4655184.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 09/02/2015 10:30 AM, David Haslam wrote: > On the other hand, I may not have previously installed all these 5 modules. Then they would show under "Uninstalled" instead of "Updates". ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.cro

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread David Haslam
Xiphos will only categorize under "Updates" if the Version has changed. For a minor tweak where only the conf file is changed, the third part of the Revision ought to be incremented. Did you ensure this was done? I just refreshed the repo in Xiphos, but I see no updates. On the other hand, I ma

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread David Haslam
Several front-ends have a user action to force a refresh for the remote module resource. Among these are Xiphos and PocketSword. Xiphos does support both FTP and HTTP. PocketSword only supports FTP for adding new sources. Do ISPs really sometimes cache FTP? I'd only expect them to cache high dem

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-02 Thread Martin Denham
emented ftp recently > -- > From: Greg Hellings > Sent: ‎02/‎09/‎2015 04:20 > To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak > > Why is HTTPS not supported? It's supported by the eng

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-01 Thread Chris Burrell
It's the only supported protocol for jsword (step, and bible, ...) though I believe dm may have implemented ftp recently -Original Message- From: "Greg Hellings" Sent: ‎02/‎09/‎2015 04:20 To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" Subject: Re: [sword-deve

Re: [sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-01 Thread Greg Hellings
Why is HTTPS not supported? It's supported by the engine and by at least BibleTime and Xiphos AFAIK. --Greg On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Kahunapule Michael Johnson < kahunap...@ebible.org> wrote: > The main repository has been updated with revised modules with Strong's > numbers (5 of them).

[sword-devel] eBible.org repository minor tweak

2015-09-01 Thread Kahunapule Michael Johnson
Title: signature The main repository has been updated with revised modules with Strong's numbers (5 of them). The update is about markup and conf files, with no change to source text. Also, I used symbolic links to allow the /pub in the directory to be omitted. In ot