Here's a use case:
If you use EasyExtends to create an Application/Sonata/UserBundle, and there
you want to override the FOSUserBundleTemplates, you need the
SonataUserBundle to inherit from FOSUserBundle, or you won't be able to do
that.
So, while SonataUserBundle doesn't override anything fr
Was your intent to remove any explicit inheritance to a particular user
bundle implementation?
If so, I guess we will have to add the inheritance ourselves to the user
bundle of our choice...
You may want to make that clearer in the documentation.
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issu
> *bin/vendors* script (the deps file that is used by this script is
intended to be modified to add your own dependencies if you > want to use
this way to manage the dependencies).
Thanks, that's great to know.
Is there some reference where we can find out more about how to use the
bin/vendor
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 9:59:52 AM UTC+3, Christophe COEVOET wrote:
>
> Each third party bundle provided by the SE will have its
> own release lifecycle, not necessarily tied with Symfony release schedules.
>
>
Will there not also be regular, packaged, integrated and tested maintenance
releas
3rd party bundles (eg. FOSUserBundle, SonataAdminBundle, etc.) are different
from the SE distribution. Different support levels, different release
schedules, etc.
While it's true in theory that SE comes with third party bundles, they
really are only third party with respect to those inside the
Does anyone else think we should be keeping 3rd party bundles separate from
the Symfony2 Standard Edition distribution, as a means of easing future
upgrades once Symfony2 becomes stable?
ie.
app/
bin/
src/
vendor/ (containing only 3rd party bundles not in the Symfony2 SE
distribution)
There seems to be different practices:
SonataAdminBundle
/ src / Sonata / AdminBundle
KnpLab's menu bundle:
/ src / Knplabs / Bundle / MenuBundle
FOSUserBundle:
/ vendor / bundles / FOS / UserBundle
I would have thought all bundles meant for distribution should go into
vendor/bundles, and th
I've seen different ways of naming services.
Fos_user:
fos_user.registration.form.builder
fos_user.mailer.default
Sonata:
sonata.admin.form.type.admin
sonata.admin.pool
sonata.admin.route_loader
In general they all reasonably seem to start with the namespace, then some
kind of section within
I'm hoping this post will save someone some time.
Like every other good developer, I wanted to install phpUnit to get some
automated testing going on Symfony2.
The phpUnit documentation tells you to use PEAR to download and install
phpUnit with all it's dependant packages.
Unfortunately, I
Found the problem - FOSUserBundle changed ROLE_SUPERADMIN to
ROLE_SUPER_ADMIN.
Changing it back to ROLE_SUPERADMIN in security.yml solved the problem, and
we were able to get into the admin backend again.
... next step I guess is to drop and recreate the database using the latest
FOSUserBundl
In beta3 we had the Sonata AdminBundle working well with the FOSUserBundle
together with the Sonata UserBundle, Sonata EasyExtends and
Application/Sonata/UserBundle.
Today we updated to Symfony2 Beta4.
We replaced the latest FOSUserBundle from the master branch (as of June
6/2011). It's workin
... ideally something like:
all_routes:
resource: "@*"
prefix: /{_locale}
requirements:
_locale: it|en
defaults:
_locale: en
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message
There are a number of posts on this topic, and an issue was opened which was
fixed by fabien in a recent update.
Issues:
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/issues/1187
Update:
https://github.com/symfony/symfony/commit/c72537da6b906d9d7599a0ce00aead597804d0c7
It sounds like we need to import a
Was wondering why the best practice recommendation for configuration file
formats changes throughout Symfony2 documentation.
For example,
1. config/config.yml file - Yaml
2. bundle config files - XML
3. application config files - Yaml.
4. translation resources - XML (XLIFF).
Any particular reas
Got the mailer first as above, same error occurs.
Is there something else which also needs to be done?
$mailer = $this->get( 'mailer' );
$message = \Swift_Message::newInstance()->setSubject( 'Contact Email' )
->setFrom( 's...@example.com' )
->setTo( 'recipi
Just confirming to see if I understand correctly:
Two app folders - frontApp, backApp.
Single code base.
Single db.
Each userland bundle has AdminFront and AdminBack classes as well
as AdminFrontController and AdminBackController classes.
The AdminBundle config is differen
> You can initialize the Frontend and Backend from within a single index.php
by matching url.
Thanks for the response, Thomas.
While in principle I understand what you are recommending, I have no clue on
what changes to make to get that setup.
Would you know of any example code somewhere on h
Getting the identical error, also on Sf2 Beta3.
*Fatal error*: Call to a member function clearAll() on a non-object in
*C:\Program
Files
(x86)\Zend\Apache2\htdocs\Symfony\vendor\swiftmailer\lib\classes\Swift\Mime\SimpleMimeEntity.php
* on line *822
Here is the code:
*
$message = \Swift_Message
maybe... different namespaces...?
Sonata/AdminBundleFrontEnd
Sonata/AdminBundleBackEnd
Code is same in each.
In our config/config.yml, we map a different AdminClass and Entity for each
of the two AdminBundles to use.
We override the templates for AdminBundleFrontEnd as needed.
Feasable?
--
I
what if we extended the CRUDController, overwrote the crud actions with
something like:
function edit(){
IF (current route is not 'admin/') THEN
//setup things for front end.
set new layout template
set new edit template
set new edit form fi
Our site uses the Sonata AdminBundle for our backend.
Now we would like to be able to also use it on our front end, so users can
manage their own properties (list, edit, delete, search/filter, etc.).
However, the following would have to be different for the front and back
end:
1. routes
Matt,
it may work without the "as", didn't try it, but figured the syntax would be
consistent with the ORM and Assert syntax.
Thanks again for your help.
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message beca
Actually the correct form of the uses is (so you can use the shorted @Route
instead of the long pathname):
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Route as Route;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configuration\Template as Template;
use Sensio\Bundle\FrameworkExtraBundle\Configu
worked like a charm.
thanks.
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send email to symfony-users@googlegr
I've switched everything over to @ORM\ and @Assert\
But not sure what the proper replacement is for @extra.
Does it need to be changed also?
If so, what class should we"use" ?
What should the new annotation form look like?
Getting this error (worked fine in beta1):
[1/2] AnnotationException: [
thanks.
Guess I'll have to make the switch from svn to git.
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony users" group.
To post to this group, send e
Having difficulty putting together a latest version of Symfony SE based on
the master (similiar to Symfony2 Beta1, just with the current master
versions of each file).
I (and I guess everyone) need to do this to use any of the major community
contributed bundles (FOSUserBundle, sonataAdminBundl
Having all the symfony 1.x releases mixed in with Symfony 2 posts can
sometimes make it difficult to discern which Symfony people are talking
about in their posts.
Not everyone is explicit on whether they are referring to Symfony1 or
Symfony2.
This is not only a problem for those working on S
Are there any advantages of one over the other, or is it totally a matter of
personal taste?
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony users" g
The documentation is slowly improving, thanks very much to those involved.
Symfony2 is a huge framework, and the documentation undertaking is
understandably difficult. The documentation team have really done a great
job so far for software which has only just reached beta1, and I think
everyon
Besides doctrine:generate:entities, anyone know of a faster way than
manually typing out the yaml files?
Perhaps an import from MySQL Workbench or some other data modelling tool?
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You r
> by default, the console run in dev environment. You need to use --env=prod
Bingo. That was exactly that piece of info I was missing.
php app/console -env=prod cache:clear
Routing is now working as expected.
Thank you very much for your help Christophe.
I'll try and summarize for anyone els
Thanks for trying to help, Christophe.
Cleared the cache using CLI:
php app/console cache:clear
http://localhost/Symfony/web/app_dev.php/demo/contact => works
http://localhost/Symfony/web/app.php/demo/contact => doesn't work (** this
is interesting - it should work ... hmmm)
http://localhost/S
the plot thickens (straight out of the vanilla install of beta1)...
http://localhost/Symfony/web/demo/hello/myname ==> works
http://localhost/Symfony/web/demo/contact ==> doesn't work
Same controller / two different actions, one gets routed, the other doesn't
unless you add the app_dev.php as be
Thank you for responding.
I tried adding various incarnations of RewriteBase to the .htaccess in web/,
as shown below, but no difference.
RewriteBase /
RewriteBase /Symfony
RewriteBase /Symfony/web
I can't help but think the issue may be something other than RewriteBase,
because the demo urls
Using Beta1, Symfony2 installs and runs fine with the Acme demo bundle
working perfectly.
Apache Rewrite is configured and working, and so both of the following urls
with and without app_dev.php nicely show the welcome screen of the Acme
demo.
http://localhost/Symfony/web/app_dev.php/
http://l
Thanks for the advice.
I guess there are three issues:
1. the risk of developing in an environment different than the production
environment.
I mitigate the environment risk by system testing on a test server identical
to the production box prior to deployment. I imagine it would be pretty
Does anyone do development in a VM running linux or is that too clunky?
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "symfony users" group.
To post to this g
Which of the following setups would lend itself best to the various Symfony2
processes for development, test, profiling/debugging and deployment?
1. windows with cygwin/mintty for Symfony's CLI, and a WAMP stack.
2. windows with a VM running some linux distribution containing a LAMP
stack
3. wi
Is it this google group, or
http://forum.symfony-project.org/viewforum.php?f=23
Both seem to be fairly active.
Would it make sense to consolidate into a single place?
--
If you want to report a vulnerability issue on symfony, please send it to
security at symfony-project.com
You received t
gentle bump...
On Feb 28, 5:59 pm, keymaster wrote:
> I've searched the Symfony/Doctrine documentation, as well as this
> forum and Google, but was unable to find an answer.
>
> The Symfony manual says: "The ORM is smart enough to detect
> relationships between object
I've searched the Symfony/Doctrine documentation, as well as this
forum and Google, but was unable to find an answer.
The Symfony manual says: "The ORM is smart enough to detect
relationships between objects, so saving the $article object also
saves the related $comment object. "
How deep does th
42 matches
Mail list logo
