On 5/2/08 6:42 AM, "Jonathan Franks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i'm moving over to OS X and I was wondering what svn gui people
> recommend?? I've been using tortoiseSVN on my pc.
>
SCPlugin is meant to be comparable to Tortise. Ive used it a couple times
but i usually just use Subclipse
IMO, both RapidSvn and svnX are far too buggy and incomplete to actually
use. Development of both apps seems to have stopped long ago as well.
SCPlugin looks promising, but has a few bugs listed that make me not
want to use it yet...
SyncroSVNClient is pretty awesome for me. It's not free, but
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Jonathan Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i'm moving over to OS X and I was wondering what svn gui people
> recommend?? I've been using tortoiseSVN on my pc.
If you got a bit of time, you can learn using svn through the command
line interface, it's not that
Eclipse has a nice svn plugin Eclipse is also a very good IDE to
handle symfony project
Thomas
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Nicolas Perriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Jonathan Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > i'm moving over to OS X and I
I do use svn from the command line, but I prefer a graphical interface
for browsing files.
Nicolas Perriault wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Jonathan Franks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> i'm moving over to OS X and I was wondering what svn gui people
>> recommend?? I've been u
I use eclipse on the PC but I've heard such good things about TextMate
that I'm playing with that at the moment.
Thomas Rabaix wrote:
> Eclipse has a nice svn plugin Eclipse is also a very good IDE to
> handle symfony project
>
> Thomas
>
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Nicolas Perri
Well there is a textamte bundle for SVN too. I had forgotten about that.
On 5/2/08 8:32 AM, "Jonathan Franks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I use eclipse on the PC but I've heard such good things about TextMate
> that I'm playing with that at the moment.
>
>
> Thomas Rabaix wrote:
>> Ec
Well, Eclipse plugin is very good, far more evoluate than Textmate bundle
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Ant Cunningham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well there is a textamte bundle for SVN too. I had forgotten about that.
>
>
>
>
> On 5/2/08 8:32 AM, "Jonathan Franks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yeah but despite being totally in love with Eclipse I still like Textmate
better. The SVN tmbundle doesn't hold a candle to Subclipse though... that
much is true.
On 5/2/08 8:45 AM, "Thomas Rabaix" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Well, Eclipse plugin is very good, far more evoluate than T
I gave svnx a try the other day but abandoned it and just went back to the
command line. I found it easier to just use my browser for visually browsing
the repository, and manually issuing my commands.
- Jon
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Ant Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Yeah but d
>
> but despite being totally in love with Eclipse I still like Textmate
> better
exciting! but what is it that makes textmate so popular?
Ant Cunningham wrote:
> Yeah but despite being totally in love with Eclipse I still like Textmate
> better. The SVN tmbundle doesn't hold a candle to Subclip
I like it b/c it is so powerful yes so lightweight. It has the best
shortcuts for being efficient in your editor, it has some great bundles
which integrate with svn and lots of other stuff.
I recently gave Eclipse PDT another try because I really liked the ability
to walk through the code executio
I feel the same as Jon. If you have a really complex application Eclipse can be invaluable for the automatic API hinting, code versioning (the merge/diff editor in Subclipse is brillant!), debug, and general code inspection. But if what youre doing is fairly lightweight like theming a cms or bui
On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jonathan Franks wrote:
> exciting! but what is it that makes textmate so popular?
At the risk of being unpopular, I think TM is "trendy" because of Rails.
I dislike most IDEs so vim + svn is fine for me (and even more
lightweight).
--
--~--~-~--~~
On 3 May 2008, at 05:58, Eno wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jonathan Franks wrote:
>
>> exciting! but what is it that makes textmate so popular?
>
> At the risk of being unpopular, I think TM is "trendy" because of
> Rails.
Not unpopular, just wrong :p
It's because of crop circles ;)
Or
On May 3, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Lee Bolding wrote:
> Or maybe because it's lightweight, has syntax highlighting,
I don't think it's lightweight at all. At least in my computer, after
using it for a while with many tabs, it's a
true memory hog.
Guillermo Rauch
http://devthought.com
--~--~---
Ive never com across that and im on a g4 800, ha! But i dont think ive ever
had more than 12 tabs open and normally i only have 1-6 open at a
time...anymore than that and it just gets annoying (but i keep my window no
more than 80 cols wide). I can tell you Eclipse with more than like 6 or 8
tabs
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Lee Bolding wrote:
> Or maybe because it's lightweight, has syntax highlighting,
> powerful keyboard shortcuts and built in support for many languages/
> formats via bundles?
You mean, it has all the features that most decent text editors have.
--
--~--~-~
18 matches
Mail list logo
