On Jan 1, 12:26 am, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a problem here?
Can we make a numpy array of sympy symbols?
import swiginac
import numpy
a = swiginac.symbol('AB')
a
AB
A = numpy.array([a])
A
array([AB], dtype=object)
import sympy
a =
Alan, thanks for your interest to SymPy!
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 03:16:14PM -0500, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
If I want to submit a python module for sympy what conventions
(programming, documenting, etc.) should I adhere to?
It is good to first discuss your ideas / code in the issues:
On Jan 1, 2008 9:11 AM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 1, 12:26 am, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we have a problem here?
Can we make a numpy array of sympy symbols?
import swiginac
import numpy
a = swiginac.symbol('AB')
a
AB
A =
On Jan 1, 2008 10:20 AM, Kirill Smelkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 08:03:45AM -0800, David wrote:
The following code produces an AssertionError:
two = Rational(2)
if two:
doSomething()
This version, however, works fine:
two = Rational(2)
if two
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
google now for some time allows to sort the issues as we want, so if you go
to:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list
the first issues are the ones with a milestone set, the rest is sorted
according to a
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 05:04:06PM +0300, Kirill Smelkov wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 02:50:13PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
google now for some time allows to sort the issues as we want, so if you go
to:
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list
the first issues
Also, maybe let's write xfailing tests for reported issues *before*
fixing them?
Why not. But I think if someone goes to write the test, he can as well
fix it. :)
Ondrej
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
On Jan 1, 2008 1:08 PM, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Joyner wrote:
Just some ideas: For me, geometric algebra refers to material in the
famous book by E Artin. Your usage of the term is apparently
common with mathematical physicists. I would recommend changing the
name
On Jan 1, 2008 7:16 PM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 1, 6:08 pm, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know anything about Maple or Mathematica (they cost money so I
don't use them)..
Sometimes it is worth of looking at how other CA systems (most of them
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Jan 1, 2008 7:16 PM, Pearu Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 1, 6:08 pm, Alan Bromborsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know anything about Maple or Mathematica (they cost money so I
don't use them)..
Sometimes it is worth of looking at how
On 1/1/08, Alan Bromborsky wrote:
...
I looked at a paper on the Maple Clifford package. The problem
I would have with it is that it is Clifford algebra for mathematicians,
not for physicists.
That is peculiar since it was designed by two physicists.
http://www.math.tntech.edu/rafal
11 matches
Mail list logo
