Ondrej Certik wrote: > On Jan 1, 2008 7:16 PM, Pearu Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> On Jan 1, 6:08 pm, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> I don't know anything about Maple or Mathematica (they cost money so I >>> don't use them).. >>> >> Sometimes it is worth of looking at how other CA systems (most of them >> have manuals online for free) handle certain problems and what >> interfaces they provide. This is useful in a situation when a user of >> these >> systems tries out sympy and s/he will be more satisfied if the >> general structure/user interface of the corresponding sympy package >> looks similar (at least) to what s/he has been used to. >> > > > Exactly. And also all opensource CA systems should have similar or the > same interface, > currently the project with a biggest momentum in this area is Sage > (sagemath.org). > > Ondrej > > > > I looked at a paper on the Maple Clifford package. The problem I would have with it is that it is Clifford algebra for mathematicians, not for physicists. I would not have a clue as to how to pose the sort of problems I want to solve in that package. Also I maybe have an irrational attachment to python as opposed to special purpose interfaces!
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
