On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Fabian Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Could it be possible to access git through http?
>>
>> You see, In my campus, the port for git:// is blocked so having an http
>> mirro
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:18 PM, Fredrik Johansson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, some tests are now lot slower. Now:
>
> You say "some tests"; are there others than the integration tests?
I haven't had t
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:40 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unfortunately, some tests are now lot slower. Now:
You say "some tests"; are there others than the integration tests?
> Do you know where the problem is?
No. A pure guess is that some unnecessary conversion started
happ
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Fredrik Johansson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The first is due to quadts(f, a, b) changing syntax to quadts(f, [a,
> b]) (a trivial fix in evalf.py) and the second is due to findpoly
>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first is due to quadts(f, a, b) changing syntax to quadts(f, [a,
b]) (a trivial fix in evalf.py) and the second is due to findpoly
reversing order (see the "XXX:" comment in nsimplify; also trivially
fixed)
Fredrik
--
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:12 PM, Fredrik Johansson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I now encountered a more serious problem with x[0] and
>> x._mpf_[0]. Here is how to reproduce (Kirill, is there an easier wa
Hi Henrik!
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 5:37 PM, henjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Sympy for quite some time now in a symbolic electric
> circuit solver (which I will release soon).
>
> To the problem, I have a matrix that gives an incorrect inverse:
>
A = Matrix([[x+y
> Ok, this is in. Today I fixed most of the limits, please review my 15
> patches in sympy-patches. Also I fixed couple more things to work
> properly with python2.6.
>
> Then let's do our best with the rest of issues and finally release.
Ok, 10 (mostly limit) issues closed. :)
Ondrej
--~--~---
Hi,
I have been using Sympy for quite some time now in a symbolic electric
circuit solver (which I will release soon).
To the problem, I have a matrix that gives an incorrect inverse:
>>> A = Matrix([[x+y, -x, 0], [-x-y, x, 1], [0,1,0]])
>>> Ainv = A.inv()
>>> Ainv.simplify()
>>> print Ainv
⎡0
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 6:20 PM, Ondrej Certik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Alan Bromborsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I read you blog on "git". Are we going to switch from "hg" to "git"
>> (thank god)?
>
> Is it thank god we are switching, or is it god help u
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Other related things: we should agree on how to name assumptions, I've
> seen in the code is_integer and is_Integer, is_number and
> is_Number ... we really need some
> rules on coding style ...
x.is_Integer means x is a
On Oct 17, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Fredrik Johansson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
>> Other related things: we should agree on how to name assumptions,
>> I've
>> seen in the code is_integer and is_Integer, is_number and
>> is_Number ... w
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Fredrik Johansson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Fabian Seoane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Other related things: we should agree on how to name assumptions, I've
>> seen in the code is_integer and is_Integer, is_number and
>> is
On Oct 16, 2008, at 4:54 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I sent a patch implementing Basic.simplify():
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches/browse_thread/thread/af95cd2b52745d2b
>
> and we should discuss it with everyone, let's discuss it here.
>
> Fabian:
>
> "
> I'm 0 for this
14 matches
Mail list logo
