Updates:
Summary: more efficient core
Comment #7 on issue 1908 by Vinzent.Steinberg: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
sympyx seems to be what we want. Do we need to get rid of the old
assumptions before
merging it?
--
You received this message
Comment #10 on issue 489 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: typical_range in Symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=489
I don't think this a good idea to overload Symbol with this and I don't see
how it
can be properly formalised.
OTOH, having interval arithmetic and random variables
Comment #8 on issue 1908 by asmeurer: more efficient core
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
Yeah, that was the other conclusion we came to.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue.
You may
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #9 on issue 103 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Basic.__lt__ and
Basic.__gt__ and py.test -l
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=103
py.test doesn't even work any more, so this is now irrelevant.
--
You received this message because you are
Comment #59 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is
too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
I'm getting failures for the 1766 branch. Actually it hangs somewhere when
your try
to run the tests:
[...]
Comment #11 on issue 489 by Vinzent.Steinberg: typical_range in Symbols
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=489
I would just implement it as a subclass of Symbol.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred
Comment #60 on issue 1766 by Vinzent.Steinberg: expand(power_base=True) is
too aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
Issue 1909 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1766
Comment #6 on issue 1909 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Expand function does not
deal with non-commutative multiplication and powers
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1909
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You
Comment #1 on issue 1910 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Update --help for bin/test
and bin/doctest with glob information
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1910
Looks good, but you should fix the lowercase at the beginning of sentences.
--
You received this message because you are
Issue 1884: remove old assumptions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1884
This issue is now blocking issue 1908.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1908
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Updates:
Status: Started
Blockedon: 1778
Comment #19 on issue 1374 by Vinzent.Steinberg: simplify(x**2-x**2.0) does
not yield 0.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374
rsimplify() from issue 1778 should fix this. (I'm -1 on doing this
automatically.)
--
You
Issue 1778: Rational from string can be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
This issue is now blocking issue 1374.
See http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1374
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Updates:
Cc: robert.kern
Comment #12 on issue 1264 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Discrepancies between
running the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
If we don't know how to reproduce this, we have to close this issue.
Robert, can you
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 1911 by alberthilbert: Error in expansion of power with
noncommutative base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1911
Expansion of powers with noncommutative Mul as base is wrong:
x = Symbol('x',
Comment #2 on issue 1910 by asmeurer: Update --help for bin/test and
bin/doctest with glob information
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1910
Yes, that was intentional because it was referring to the text
from bin/test [options …] [files …]. Maybe I
should put them in
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Cc: smichr
Mergedinto: 1766
Comment #1 on issue 1911 by asmeurer: Error in expansion of power with
noncommutative base
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1911
Yes, I think expand should definitely return x*y*x*y*x*y. That is
Comment #61 on issue 1766 by asmeurer: expand(power_base=True) is too
aggressive
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1766
Issue 1911 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because you
Comment #13 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
With difficulty, yes. I will try to reduce it down to a script that can be
run, but it is hard to do.
--
You received this
Updates:
Status: New
Labels: -Milestone-Release0.6.5 Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #14 on issue 1263 by robert.kern: Invalid movement of roots across
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263
The bug seems to be back:
In [2]: z = Symbol('z', real=True,
Comment #14 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
Drop test_wester.py into sympy/core/tests/. Run show_issue1264.py .
Attachments:
show_issue1264.py 360 bytes
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Cc: smichr
Labels: -NeedsReview
Comment #15 on issue 1263 by asmeurer: Invalid movement of roots across
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263
I bisected, and this is the bad commit (between 0.6.5 and 0.6.6):
Comment #32 on issue 1778 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Rational from string can
be improved
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1778
* I don't like the name of rsimplify: what it does appears unrelated to
simplification and there's a possible confusion with ratsimp.
* I think
Comment #16 on issue 1263 by mattpap: Invalid movement of roots across
fractions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1263
Also, it looks like the problem is in cancel:
In [1]: z = Symbol('z', real=True, negative=True)
In [2]: sqrt(1/z)
Out[2]:
___
/ 1
/ -
\/ z
In
Comment #15 on issue 1264 by Vinzent.Steinberg: Discrepancies between
running the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
Thanks, I created a branch from this, you can pull from:
git://github.com/vks/sympy.git testfail
I'm getting these
Comment #16 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
The failures in test_wester.py are unimportant (at least for this bug). I'm
not sure which of those tests are causing
the
Comment #17 on issue 1264 by asmeurer: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
This is possibly related to issue 1747.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this
Comment #18 on issue 1264 by robert.kern: Discrepancies between running the
full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
Seems quite likely.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or because
Updates:
Cc: asmeurer Ronan.Lamy robert.kern
Comment #4 on issue 1747 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: nseries test failure with
bin/test --random
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1747
Issue 1264 has been merged into this issue.
--
You received this message because you are
Updates:
Status: Duplicate
Mergedinto: 1747
Comment #19 on issue 1264 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Discrepancies between
running the full test suite and individual tests
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1264
It's still I11 that causes the problem:
In [1]:
Updates:
Labels: Milestone-Release0.7.0
Comment #3 on issue 1756 by ronan.l...@gmail.com: Division by order terms
is invalid
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1756
The best way to solve this would probably be to scrap the Order class and
replace it
with an object
Ya thanks a lot for helping me.If i have any doubts i will surely ask you
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Kazuo Thow kazuo.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aditya,
I'm fairly new to SymPy as well (just submitted my first patch earlier
this
week), but I found the User's Guide [1] and Patches
On Apr 19, 9:33 pm, Aditya C.S aditya@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am aditya.cs.I know python.I want to contribut for sympy.Can
anyone please help me out.Please guide me how to contribute, what are
the steps ect..
You are welcome! For contributing to sympy, there are some already
Anyone planning on attending the Sage Days in Toronto by any chance?
- http://www.fields.utoronto.ca/programs/scientific/09-10/sage/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sympy group.
To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
To
33 matches
Mail list logo
