Comment #8 on issue 1656 by akshaysrinivasan: lambdify does not yield
Symbolic expressions.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1656
Should've used .atoms() earlier. Anyway here's a smaller patch which - I
think -
fixes this issue.
Attachments:
Updates:
Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview
Comment #9 on issue 1656 by asmeurer: lambdify does not yield Symbolic
expressions.
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1656
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
After my work on Predicates, I've made another attempt at replacing the
old assumption system with the new one and the results are encouraging.
After a few more relatively simple changes to the assumptions system -
that
On 18 Mai, 07:31, Ronan Lamy ronan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
After my work on Predicates, I've made another attempt at replacing the
old assumption system with the new one and the results are encouraging.
After a few more relatively simple changes to the assumptions system -
that make it
I'm starting to get mighty confused with the parallel attempts. Fabian,
Ronan, and Ondrej all have at least one branch doing the same thing that is
very closely related to my SoC goals -- removing the old system and making
the new one uber fast. Any suggestions on how to unify all the threads?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Christian Muise
christian.mu...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm starting to get mighty confused with the parallel attempts. Fabian,
Ronan, and Ondrej all have at least one branch doing the same thing that is
very closely related to my SoC goals -- removing the old system
Le mardi 18 mai 2010 à 12:03 -0400, Christian Muise a écrit :
I'm starting to get mighty confused with the parallel attempts.
Fabian, Ronan, and Ondrej all have at least one branch doing the same
thing that is very closely related to my SoC goals -- removing the old
system and making the new
