Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Comment #42 on issue 1694 by nicolas.pourcelot: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 if checksol(b, symbol, sol) is not True: # False or None yes, I adapted it from if checksol(f, symbol, sol) is not False: in an other part of the code,

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Comment #43 on issue 1694 by nicolas.pourcelot: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 Or we may at least emit a warning for the solutions which could not be verified. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -PassedReview NeedsReview Comment #44 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 1) Regarding comment 13,14: There is only one solution to the equation in question there. Does the current patch

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: -NeedsReview NeedsBetterPatch Comment #45 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 Two bad solutions are slipping through after applying the patch: from sympy import * var('x') x

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Comment #46 on issue 1694 by smichr: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 Also, the above takes excessively long to report in comparison to master: master: 0.635 3.04 - 6.03*I 0 3.04 + 6.03*I 2.2135913 after patch: 3.04 - 6.03*I 0 3.04

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: -asmeurer Labels: -NeedsBetterPatch NeedsReview Comment #47 on issue 1694 by nicolas.pourcelot: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 @smichr, in short (I've just lost my comment before posting it): #comments

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Comment #49 on issue 1694 by asmeurer: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 It's because you are only running it when f is a Mul or Pow (here it is an Add). Maybe you meant to only indent line 257? -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 1694 in sympy: solve has many issues with fractions

2010-07-03 Thread sympy
Comment #50 on issue 1694 by nicolas.pourcelot: solve has many issues with fractions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1694 I use f.as_numer_denom() only for Mul or Pow. But in case of GS_POLY_CV_1 strategy, checksol() is used for an Add. (line 322) for sol in cv_sols:

Re: [sympy] Re: git.sympy.org

2010-07-03 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Jul 2, 2010, at 5:41 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote: Hi, I just read this: http://github.com/blog/674-introducing-organizations citing: or needed

Re: [sympy] Re: git.sympy.org

2010-07-03 Thread Aaron S. Meurer
For those people who have originally cloned from the old git.sympy.org, this will set the pull url to the GitHub page: git remote set-url origin g...@github.com:sympy/sympy.git and this will (I think) add the old one as a backup: git remote set-url --add origin git://git.sympy.org/sympy.git

Re: [sympy] Re: git.sympy.org

2010-07-03 Thread James Pearson
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: We need to create some better pages. It's as simple as just cloning the repo, and pushing it in. What kind of things (if any) did you have in mind? Would we like to eventually have all of the wiki pages there, instead, or

Re: [sympy] Re: git.sympy.org

2010-07-03 Thread Ondrej Certik
On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 4:29 PM, James Pearson james.m.pear...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 1:20 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote: We need to create some better pages. It's as simple as just cloning the repo, and pushing it in. What kind of things (if any) did you have in