As a part of trying to understand how to create scientific programs
assisted by sympy, I've made a computer model of derivations, so each
step could be checked by sympy.
Finally I have a simple example using the configurational integral in
statistical mechanics. It starts from the general expressi
On Apr 23, 2011, at 7:11 PM, Chris Smith wrote:
> Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
>> On 22 Apr., 16:53, "Chris Smith" wrote:
>>> I don't think we should get hung up on the fact that a set of
>>> solutions should be returned as a literal set. How that set gets
>>> represented/presented is just an interf
Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 à 07:33 +0545, Chris Smith a écrit :
> Ronan Lamy wrote:
> > Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 à 06:56 +0545, Chris Smith a écrit :
> >> Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
> >>> On 22 Apr., 16:53, "Chris Smith" wrote:
> I don't think we should get hung up on the fact that a set of
> >
Ronan Lamy wrote:
> Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 à 06:56 +0545, Chris Smith a écrit :
>> Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
>>> On 22 Apr., 16:53, "Chris Smith" wrote:
I don't think we should get hung up on the fact that a set of
solutions should be returned as a literal set. How that set gets
r
Le dimanche 24 avril 2011 à 06:56 +0545, Chris Smith a écrit :
> Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
> > On 22 Apr., 16:53, "Chris Smith" wrote:
> >> I don't think we should get hung up on the fact that a set of
> >> solutions should be returned as a literal set. How that set gets
> >> represented/presented
Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
> On 22 Apr., 16:53, "Chris Smith" wrote:
>> I don't think we should get hung up on the fact that a set of
>> solutions should be returned as a literal set. How that set gets
>> represented/presented is just an interface issue. I don't see
>> anything wrong with presenting
Frédéric Grosshans-André wrote:
> Another strategy seems possible, and I think, simple enough for me to
> program. However, I'm not a programmer, and I don't know sympy well
> enough to know if my idea is stupid or not.
>
> I think about a parameter to series() to manually tell it should only
> re
I am +1 to push this in now.
Ondrej
Sent from mobile phone
On Apr 23, 2011 1:26 PM, "Mateusz Paprocki" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 April 2011 22:05, Vinzent Steinberg
> wrote:
>
>> On 23 Apr., 04:31, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
>> > Testing 32-bit setup right now, but it will take ages to finish on
>> m
By the way, I can't reproduce this error on my machine. So something is very
platform dependent (probably depending on the order of iteration through a
dictionary or something) and should be fixed. In the mean time, maybe we
should just XFAIL the test.
Aaron Meurer
On Apr 23, 2011, at 2:26 P
On 22 Apr., 16:53, "Chris Smith" wrote:
> I don't think we should get hung up on the fact that a set of solutions
> should be returned as a literal set. How that set gets represented/presented
> is just an interface issue. I don't see anything wrong with presenting the
> set as elements in a li
Hi,
On 23 April 2011 22:05, Vinzent Steinberg
wrote:
> On 23 Apr., 04:31, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
> > Testing 32-bit setup right now, but it will take ages to finish on
> my
> > > laptop.
> >
> > Done. Besides the standard set of failures, there is an additional one
> > (Python 2.7):
> >
> > __
On 23 Apr., 04:31, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
> Testing 32-bit setup right now, but it will take ages to finish on
my
> > laptop.
>
> Done. Besides the standard set of failures, there is an additional one
> (Python 2.7):
>
> __ sympy/solvers/tests/test_solvers.py:test_tsolve_1
>
Le samedi 23 avril 2011 à 06:29 +0545, Chris Smith a écrit :
>
> nseries is allowed to give (quickly) something close to the request.
> It may not. series used to not give what was requested. Now it tries
> to and raises an error if it can't. What it needs is a method of
> knowing when the 6 terms
Hey everyone,
The pull request 184 [0] has some work on Cholesky and LDL
decomposition with some very useful auxiliary functions like
triangular and diagonal solves.
Its been waiting to be pushed in for a long time now. It enables
solving for least square which currently sympy completely lacks. Ma
Hi,
On 23 April 2011 09:33, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23 April 2011 04:20, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22 April 2011 15:39, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>>
Hi,
On 23 April 2011 04:20, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Mateusz Paprocki wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 22 April 2011 15:39, Aaron S. Meurer wrote:
>
>> On Apr 22, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Ronan Lamy
>> wrote:
>> >> Le v
16 matches
Mail list logo
