Hello,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> And lastly, if anyone has any thoughts on how we could canonically
> order the arguments of Add and Mul independent of hash values, but is
> still just as fast as hash values, I would love to hear it. If we
> could do that, it would
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> The only potential issue I see with not sorting at all is if some
> algorithm implicitly relies on the order of iteration through .args to
> get a specific result (even if all results are mathematically
> correct). We'll find these soon enough
Hi,
I noticed that sometimes the Travis CI buildbot succeeds, and Stefan's
buildbot fails on the same code.
I also understand that sometimes the 32bit and 64bit Python versions
behave differently in tests
and sometimes also major Python versions like 3.2 vs 2.7, also I think
2.4 and 2.5 (or maybe
> I noticed that sometimes the Travis CI buildbot succeeds, and Stefan's
> buildbot fails on the same code.
> I also understand that sometimes the 32bit and 64bit Python versions
> behave differently in tests
> and sometimes also major Python versions like 3.2 vs 2.7, also I think
> 2.4 and 2.5 (or
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> I just merged pull request https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1379,
> which enables hash randomization by default in the test runner. What
> this means is that if you are running Python 2.6.8, 2.7.3, 3.2.3, or
> 3.3, then y
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:24 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> I noticed that sometimes the Travis CI buildbot succeeds, and Stefan's
>> buildbot fails on the same code.
>> I also understand that sometimes the 32bit and 64bit Python versions
>> behave differently in tests
>> and sometimes
Hi,
I need some help with figuring out how to implement robust pull
requests testing with sympy-bot.
The webapp at reviews.sympy.org (the source code of which is in the
"web" directory of sympy-bot)
has a database of all pull requests, and I can quite easily implement
almost any interaction betwe
This will be quite an effort. Is it worth it? There is already
TravisCI for the master branch (and it is capable of testing PR if we
want). There is also the admittedly-very-ugly script that I use for
testing - it fails occasionally, however one rarely waits for more
than half a day to receive 3 te
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:38 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
> This will be quite an effort. Is it worth it? There is already
> TravisCI for the master branch (and it is capable of testing PR if we
> want). There is also the admittedly-very-ugly script that I use for
> testing - it fails occ
> Can you post your script? If it already implements the above, that
> would of course be great!
> I didn't know about it.
I have posted a version of it some time ago as a pull request:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/pull/74
The current version is a bit more robust, however this is only a
**t
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:13 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> Can you post your script? If it already implements the above, that
>> would of course be great!
>> I didn't know about it.
>
> I have posted a version of it some time ago as a pull request:
> https://github.com/sympy/sympy-bot/p
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> I just donated $70 to Travis CI for sympy, so they will probably
> enable the pull request testing
> soon.
Looks like it's working:
http://travis-ci.org/#!/sympy/sympy/pull_requests
Ondrej
--
You received this message because you are sub
> I think it works well. Would you mind posting your current script?
> So that I can set it up on my server as well.
OK, however it will not do much good - what is tested by your server
will not be tested by mine and vice-versa. So running it on two
machines would be useful only if there are too ma
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:56 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> I think it works well. Would you mind posting your current script?
>> So that I can set it up on my server as well.
> OK, however it will not do much good - what is tested by your server
> will not be tested by mine and vice-ver
How to get the domain for log(..), tan(..), sqrt(x-1) and etc.?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/-/8H5fxZkvktAJ.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> I just donated $70 to Travis CI for sympy, so they will probably
>> enable the pull request testing
>> soon.
>
> Looks like it's working:
>
> http://travis-ci.org/#!/sympy/sympy/pul
On Jun 24, 2012, at 1:33 PM, "Ondřej Čertík" wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:24 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>> I noticed that sometimes the Travis CI buildbot succeeds, and Stefan's
>>> buildbot fails on the same code.
>>> I also understand that sometimes the 32bit and 64bit Pyt
On Jun 24, 2012, at 1:11 PM, "Ondřej Čertík" wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>> Hi everyone.
>>
>> I just merged pull request https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/1379,
>> which enables hash randomization by default in the test runner. What
>> this means is that if
On Jun 24, 2012, at 4:06 PM, "Ondřej Čertík" wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:56 PM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>>> I think it works well. Would you mind posting your current script?
>>> So that I can set it up on my server as well.
>> OK, however it will not do much good - what is te
Unfortunately, this is not implemented yet. See
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2955.
Aaron Meurer
On Jun 24, 2012, at 4:32 PM, "Иван Петухов" wrote:
How to get the domain for log(..), tan(..), sqrt(x-1) and etc.?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to th
20 matches
Mail list logo
