Re: Issue 1756 in sympy: Division by order terms is invalid

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #13 on issue 1756 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Division by order terms is invalid http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1756 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project

Re: Issue 3683 in sympy: AssertionError: sqrt(sin(x**3)).series(x,0,3)

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #2 on issue 3683 by skirpic...@gmail.com: AssertionError: sqrt(sin(x**3)).series(x,0,3) http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3683 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because

Re: Issue 3554 in sympy: Error in function series()

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #4 on issue 3554 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Error in function series() http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3554 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is

Re: Issue 3111 in sympy: series(cot(x**20 + x**21 + x**22), x, 0, 1) is wrong

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Labels: -NeedsReview Comment #4 on issue 3111 by skirpic...@gmail.com: series(cot(x**20 + x**21 + x**22), x, 0, 1) is wrong http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3111 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message

Re: Issue 3330 in sympy: Taylor expansion wrong for this expression?

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #3 on issue 3330 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Taylor expansion wrong for this expression? http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3330 https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2347 -- You received this message because this project is configured to

Re: Issue 815 in sympy: series TODO

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com Comment #8 on issue 815 by skirpic...@gmail.com: series TODO http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=815 I think, we should either close this bugreport or clarify what exactly is remaining to be fixed (blocked on #?!). -- You received this

Re: Issue 815 in sympy: series TODO

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #9 on issue 815 by ondrej.c...@gmail.com: series TODO http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=815 I think it's done. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address. You may adjust

Re: Issue 1721 in sympy: Rename class 'Real'

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Labels: NeedsReview Comment #21 on issue 1721 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Rename class 'Real' http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1721 (No comment was entered for this change.) -- You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue

Re: Issue 2703 in sympy: summation(z**n, (n, 1, oo)) gives a strange result

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Cc: matt...@gmail.com Comment #4 on issue 2703 by skirpic...@gmail.com: summation(z**n, (n, 1, oo)) gives a strange result http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2703 Ok, close. -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 2734 in sympy: ask(~Q.negative(log(p)**2), Q.positive(p)) is None

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Cc: asmeu...@gmail.com Comment #5 on issue 2734 by skirpic...@gmail.com: ask(~Q.negative(log(p)**2), Q.positive(p)) is None http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2734 pr #2027 was merged. close. -- You received this message because this

Re: Issue 2163 in sympy: Factor out the Gruntz debugging code for use in other functions

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #3 on issue 2163 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Factor out the Gruntz debugging code for use in other functions http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=2163 pr #2321 was merged. close. -- You received this message because this project is configured

Re: Issue 1497 in sympy: Remove automatic distribution 2*(x + y) = 2*x + 2*y

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Comment #19 on issue 1497 by ben.luc...@gmail.com: Remove automatic distribution 2*(x + y) = 2*x + 2*y http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1497 Please let me know if I'm adding discussion in the wrong place - I don't want to clutter this issue. I'm working on some of the tests

Re: Issue 1497 in sympy: Remove automatic distribution 2*(x + y) = 2*x + 2*y

2013-08-02 Thread sympy
Comment #20 on issue 1497 by asmeu...@gmail.com: Remove automatic distribution 2*(x + y) = 2*x + 2*y http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1497 I'd say no. The coefficient is exactly -(1/8 - y), not y - 1/8. -- You received this message because this project is configured to send

Re: [sympy] Test code environment

2013-08-02 Thread Joachim Durchholz
Am 02.08.2013 04:00, schrieb Aaron Meurer: On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 01.08.2013 05:22, schrieb Aaron Meurer: Some digging in the git history using git blame shows commit 33708173 and https://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=1141.

Re: [sympy] Re: Faster CSE

2013-08-02 Thread Cristóvão Sousa
Hi, Is it possible to execute the Travis or SymPyBot tests without making a PR? I would like to run the whole test set prior to make a PR, however, tests are too slow my poor laptop (and they seem to burn it :/ ). On Friday, July 12, 2013 8:36:48 PM UTC+1, Ondřej Čertík wrote: Hi Cristóvão,

Re: [sympy] Re: Faster CSE

2013-08-02 Thread Jason Moore
There isn't any reason not to make a pull request. You can always close it after the tests run. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Cristóvão Sousa cris...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is it possible to execute the Travis or SymPyBot tests without making a PR?

Re: [sympy] Re: Faster CSE

2013-08-02 Thread Cristóvão Sousa
Ok, nice! On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Jason Moore moorepa...@gmail.com wrote: There isn't any reason not to make a pull request. You can always close it after the tests run. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Cristóvão Sousa cris...@gmail.com

Re: [sympy] Re: Faster CSE

2013-08-02 Thread Ondřej Čertík
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:48 AM, Cristóvão Sousa cris...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Is it possible to execute the Travis or SymPyBot tests without making a PR? You can setup Travis for your own branch at github. You can run sympy-bot locally I think. You can also just execute tests using bin/test.

Re: [sympy] Re: Faster CSE

2013-08-02 Thread Aaron Meurer
Yes, as Jason said, it's best to just submit a pull request as soon as you have code, so that we can see it and start commenting on it. But to answer your actual question, you just need to enable the Travis hook in your GitHub. If you look on the Travis site there are instructions. Aaron Meurer

[sympy] Re: Lie algebra module

2013-08-02 Thread Mary Clark
Additionally, regarding PR 2344, in my docstring for dynkin_diagram.py I have a print statement: print DynkinDiagram(A3) 0---0---0 1 2 3 Now, I just found out how in python 3.x print is now a function, so you need print(DynkinDiagram(A3)) which is why the doctests are failing for

Re: [sympy] Re: Lie algebra module

2013-08-02 Thread Aaron Meurer
For simple prints, you can do print(DynkinDiagram(A3)) even in Python 2, because it just sees redundant parentheses (you can put redundant parentheses around any expression in Python, and omit spaces when they are there). This won't work for more advanced prints, in particular, prints that end

Re: [sympy] Lie algebra module

2013-08-02 Thread David Joyner
On Friday, August 2, 2013, Mary Clark wrote: Additionally, regarding PR 2344, in my docstring for dynkin_diagram.py I have a print statement: print DynkinDiagram(A3) 0---0---0 1 2 3 Now, I just found out how in python 3.x print is now a function, so you need