Comment #3 on issue 3135 by avichal@gmail.com: Multiple series
expansions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3135
Since multivariate cases can be handled by Order, I tried the following
example
In [3]: Order(x**6*exp(y))
Out[3]:
⎛ 6 ⎞
O⎝x ; (x, y) → (0,
Comment #4 on issue 3135 by skirpic...@gmail.com: Multiple series expansions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3135
It gives only x**6 instead of x**6*exp(y)? Is it a bug or is this
expected?
Of course, it's expected:
Comment #5 on issue 3135 by avichal@gmail.com: Multiple series
expansions
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=3135
Of course, it's expected
Then I didn't understand what is meant by the below statement?
So the correct order should be something like O(exp(y)*x**6), not just
Comment #4 on issue 4003 by spoo...@abv.bg: Cannot return general quartic
solution
http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=4003
It doesn't look like a very complicated problem, but I can't fix it. I'm
afraid not to break anything. It seems that the current code is chosen to
work
Hi All
This is such a big nostalgia moment! @Anurag There are three tasks
mentioned on the PR. One of them being
- Don't hardcode the value of a in the functions in cds.py. And the input
should be a, not sqrt(a), (so, e.g., the input should be -1, not sqrt(-1))
I would try to solve this and
Two big CNF expressions with an OR tying them together is just a special
case I reckon. We'll start to face feature creep with all of the different
types of input that might be used -- ultimately what is needed is an
assessment of the types of input the satisfiable function actually sees.
There
With my work with the assumptions, I am able to keep it as CNF, or
nearly CNF, although in some cases, I have to be careful how I do
things. For example, there are simple CNF and DNF forms for exactly
one of x1, ..., xn is true. You need to use the DNF one if it is the
first part of an implication
