Thanks to whole SymPy team and Community for a wonderful
collaboration experience. Kudos!
Here is my Report:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Report-Amit-Kumar-:-Solvers
*AMiT Kumar*
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 1:30:00 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote:
The GSoC period is now
I've been using Sympy in the past few weeks more than ever before, and I
have to say it's been quite a nice experience.
As a an almost-newcomer, the single most annoying thing was that you can't
copy-and-paste code from the website. Every time I select code from the
documentation on [1], the
With `codegen`, one can generate code from a sympy expression. Typically,
it is assumed that the return value is a scalar.
In one of my use cases, the return value is Boolean. (The answer to Is x
inside a particular domain?)
The hack I employed so far is to generate the code as usual
```
from
If everyone could also add their report to
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Report (and add any other
missing information) that would be great.
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 6:03 AM, AMiT Kumar dtu.a...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks to whole SymPy team and Community for a
Hi
I like the idea. The live shell is useful in general but it would be a nice
thing to have an additional button which copies the plain code from a
particular box.
and after hiding it, I find myself on another place in the
documentation. Yikes!
This happens because the live shell tries to
Hi
I can't comment on the first part but for the boolean expression, it's a
design issue. Booleans have not been derived from Expr class in sympy which
is why it fails.
Sudhanshu Mishra
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Nico nico.schloe...@gmail.com wrote:
With `codegen`, one can generate
It looks like pympler works pretty well on sympy symbols, here is my
notebook:
https://gist.github.com/denfromufa/4d0e6a94f70fac155b66
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:03:30 PM UTC-5, Denis Akhiyarov wrote:
Nbytes is very hard in Python, and getsizeof() does not work very well.
People has
script
src=https://gist.github.com/denfromufa/4d0e6a94f70fac155b66.js;/script
On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 10:03:30 PM UTC-5, Denis Akhiyarov wrote:
Nbytes is very hard in Python, and getsizeof() does not work very well.
People has addressed this using github.com/pympler.
Not sure if
Nbytes is very hard in Python, and getsizeof() does not work very well. People
has addressed this using github.com/pympler.
Not sure if anyone tried it on sympy objects and how costly is that
calculation. Cachey has very simple nbytes calculation, mainly intended for
numpy and pandas objects.
