[sympy] Eq in Sympy

2015-12-31 Thread Rahul Padhy
I was going through the Sympy tutorial... Its given that Eq(x + 1, 4) gives the symbolic output as : x + 1 == 4 But when I run the given code snippet in my terminal or in the Sympy Live Shell, it gives me the output as : x + 1 = 4 Is this just a typo or a genuine erro

Re: [sympy] Eq in Sympy

2015-12-31 Thread Jason Moore
In SymPy 0.7.6.1 I'm getting: Python 3.5.1 |Continuum Analytics, Inc.| (default, Dec 7 2015, 11:16:01) Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. IPython 4.0.1 -- An enhanced Interactive Python. ? -> Introduction and overview of IPython's features. %quickref -> Quick

[sympy] Fwd: Your favorite open source projects need your help!

2015-12-31 Thread Jason Moore
FYI, this is the last day to get a matching donation to NumFocus which supports SymPy as the fiscal sponsor. You can specifically earmark your donation to SymPy. Jason moorepants.info +01 530-601-9791 -- Forwarded message -- From: NumFOCUS Date: Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 6:54 AM Subje

[sympy] Simplify the result of inverse laplace transform of a simple second order transfunction

2015-12-31 Thread Ken
I've just started learning Sympy. I wrote a few lines of code to perform a inverse laplace transform on a simple 2nd order transfunction: H(s) = 1 / ((s+p1) * (s+p2)). The result I got from Sympy is (e^(p1*t) - e^(p2*t))*e^-t*(p1+p2) / (p1 - p2) Is there a way to simplify this result to the on

Re: [sympy] Simplify the result of inverse laplace transform of a simple second order transfunction

2015-12-31 Thread Christophe Bal
Hello. Have you triez to expand 1nd then to factorize the formula ? Le 1 janv. 2016 03:42, "Ken" a écrit : > I've just started learning Sympy. I wrote a few lines of code to perform a > inverse laplace transform on a simple 2nd order transfunction: > > H(s) = 1 / ((s+p1) * (s+p2)). > > The resul