Re: [sympy] Brainstorming on new architecture for sympy-live

I added some comments to the doc. Aaron Meurer On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Ivan Savov wrote: > Hi All, > > A couple of months ago I volunteered to help out as maintainer for > sympy-live, but I haven't had any progress since then except to fix minor > bugs. > >

Re: [sympy] Will a Game Theory module be useful for SymPy?

It is in scope for SymPy only if it is fundamentally symbolic in nature. If it would just be numeric computations, it would be a better fit for another library. What sorts of things did you have in mind? Aaron Meurer On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 5:28 AM, Nikhil Pappu wrote: >

[sympy] Will a Game Theory module be useful for SymPy?

Hey guys I am new to SymPy and I didn't find anything specific to Game Theory while I was browsing through the documentation. Is it a good idea to implement this module? I find Game Theory quite fascinating and would love to start working on it. -- You received this message because you are

[sympy] Brainstorming on new architecture for sympy-live

Hi All, A couple of months ago I volunteered to help out as maintainer for sympy-live, but I haven't had any progress since then except to fix minor bugs. Currently the sympy-live application (and code examples in docs) are backed by google app engine (GAE) application that runs an outdated