Re: [sympy] In memory of Kalevi Suominen

to him on that PR. He will be missed, may his soul rest in peace. - Amit On Monday, March 11, 2024 at 7:50:47 PM UTC ankitd...@gmail.com wrote: > May God grant peace to the departed soul. I missed the chance to learn > from him. > > > Ankit > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2024 at 1:0

Re: [sympy] Fwd: [GSoC Mentors] Announcing GSoC 2021 with a few changes

> > My biggest concern with the new rules is the reduced stipend, which > could have consequences of raising the barrier of who can apply. > Why do you think so? Reduced stipend comes with reduced work isn't it? - Amit -- You received this message because you are subscribed t

[sympy] Re: SymPy 1.6 is released

Great work Oscar! - Amit On Sunday, May 24, 2020 at 11:44:03 AM UTC+1, Oscar wrote: > > Hi all, > > It is my pleasure to announce the final release of SymPy 1.6. The > wheel and sdist files for this release are already uploaded to pypi. > You can install sympy 1.6 with: >

[sympy] Dropping Login support for SymPy Live and SymPy Gamma

/appengine/docs/standard/python/migrate-to-python3/migrating-services#user_authentication [6] https://cloud.google.com/sql/pricing - Amit http://iamit.in/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

[sympy] Re: Newbie :)

Hi Ashlesha, Please have a look at this for contributing to SymPy: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing - Amit On Monday, November 11, 2019 at 9:43:48 AM UTC, Ashlesha Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > I am Ashlesha Kumar, undergraduate engineering student pursu

Re: [sympy] SymPy swag (shirts, mugs, water bottles, phone cases, and more)

Cool, stuff! - Amit https://iamit.int On Friday, November 2, 2018 at 3:29:32 AM UTC, Jason Moore wrote: > > How cool! I definitely ordering some stuff. What a great way to raise some > money for open source and get us decked out. > > Jason > moorepants.info > +01 530-601-9

Re: [sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

t; >> > implemented). >> >> > >> >> > IndexSet will be implemented to get access to set of sets through >> >> > indexing, >> >> > a number of sets will be passed as parameters and an instance of >> >> > IndexSet

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

Hey Yathartha, That sounds good. Cheers! Amit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Solvers: Completing solveset

and then figuring out how old "solve" solves transcendental equations. https://github.com/sympy/sympy/blob/master/sympy/solvers/solvers.py Cheers, Amit On Monday, March 12, 2018 at 4:30:04 PM UTC, Ishan Anirudh Joshi wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I am Ishan Joshi, a second ye

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

the wiki. Cheers, Amit > Thanks! > > On Sunday, March 11, 2018 at 6:01:00 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Kumar wrote: >> >> Hi Yathartha, >> >> Thanks for your interest in working on solveset. I am glad to hear that. >> The things you have mentioned are completely wo

[sympy] Re: GSoC 2018: Completing Solvers

plan to implement. Feel free to ask any questions you have. Cheers, Amit On Sunday, March 4, 2018 at 6:57:30 PM UTC, Yathartha Joshi wrote: > > Hello everyone, I am Yathartha Joshi a final year B.Tech CSE undergrad. I > am willing to be a part of GSoC 2018 for the project *Solvers: C

[sympy] Re: Regarding Pull Request

What's the error message you're getting and where? - Amit On Saturday, March 3, 2018 at 5:32:30 AM UTC, aaris...@iiitd.ac.in wrote: > > I am unable to make a pull request for an issue to which already a pull > request has been made by someone else.What could be the issue?Waiting for &

Re: [sympy] SymPy usage survey

It would be great to see the anonymised results. - Amit On Wednesday, January 24, 2018 at 6:27:49 PM UTC, Jason Moore wrote: > > Do you plan to make the anonymous results public? Could we be shared on > the form to see the results? > > moorepants.info > +01 530-601-9791 > &

[sympy] Re: Introducing Myself to Sympy Developers Team.

You don't need to be assigned an issue to work on. Pick any issue that you would like to work on and open a Pull request with the fix. Cheers, Amit On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 11:31:03 AM UTC, aaris...@iiitd.ac.in wrote: > > Thanks A Lot and I have looked upon the instructions and s

[sympy] Re: Introducing Myself to Sympy Developers Team.

Hi, You can have a look at this wiki to get started: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2018-Student-Instructions Cheers, Amit On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 5:36:27 AM UTC, aaris...@iiitd.ac.in wrote: > > I would love to contribute in Sympy. So I want to know about the mai

[sympy] Re: Introducing myself to community

Hi, Welcome to SymPy. Please have a look at the following link to start contributing to SymPy: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing Amit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from

[sympy] Re: Introducing myself to Sympy community

Hi arzoo, Please have a look at this for contributing to SymPy: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Introduction-to-contributing Amit On Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 8:16:18 PM UTC, arzoo kumar wrote: > > Hello ! I am Arzoo Prajapati. I want to contribute in sympy organization

Re: [sympy] NumFOCUS End-of-Year Fundraising Drive (SymPy fiscal sponsor)

ch is donate button, I suppose) an error pops up saying: "Please check back soon! donate This campaign has ended or is not currently active. Contact us if you would like more information on how to support!" Please have a look into this. -- Amit > You can also direct your donation spe

[sympy] Re: PyCon India - 2017

Hi Shikhar, On Monday, July 10, 2017 at 4:06:16 AM UTC+5:30, Shikhar Jaiswal wrote: > > Hi Shekhar and Amit, > > I am interested to attend this event as well. Though I was initially > planning on proposing a 40-minute talk on SymEngine and SymEngine.py, I > think that c

[sympy] Re: PyCon India - 2017

On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 11:35:20 AM UTC+5:30, Shekhar Prasad Rajak wrote: > > Thanks Amit ! > > Last year proposal was similar to the 2015 PyCon India proposal > <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fin.pycon.org%2Fcfp%2Fpycon-india-2015%2Fproposals%2Fsymbolic-compu

[sympy] Re: PyCon India - 2017

load > it here. (IPython notebooks would be great.) > > 2. please consider having a few exercises on symengine. It would be > especially good if you can make the tutorial more about sympy as a wrapper > around symengine. > > +1 We should include a short hands-on tutor

[sympy] Re: Updating SymPy changelog process

On Friday, June 23, 2017 at 1:48:04 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > Once I have finished the SymPy release, I would like to make an update > to how we do changelogs. > > Right now, changelog entries are made manually on the wiki, at > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes.

[sympy] how do i involve myself in gsoc 2017

*Dear friends,* * I have good knowledge in c ,c++,python and work with visual studio 2013 . I want to know how can I take part in GSoC 17 and how to get in contact with the mentor organizations .* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy"

Re: [sympy] Docker Image for Sympy

(and how to use it) on their system. I think what would be nice would to be be able to run SymPy Live on one's own and a Docker image would be perfect for that. > > Sudhanshu Mishra > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Sartaj Singh <singhsarta...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >

[sympy] Webcast: Doing Math with Python

, Jun 30th at 12pm - Sydney I have created a GitHub repository (https://github.com/doingmathwithpython/oreilly-webcast-2016) which will have the rough transcript, final slides and the code examples as Jupyter Notebooks. Hope you can join me there. Best Wishes, Amit. -- You received this message b

Re: [sympy] Docker Image for Sympy

7. We can update that. The main idea was to >> ship with the minimum packages, so that the size is not much (docker image >> are generally big). Amit also wrote in his blog post about FOSSASIA >> conference, that it took a considerate amount of time to setup. Though, I >> don

Re: [sympy] Create symbols() from a list of variables

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote: > You can just use symbols(variables) (symbols() works with a list of strings). Or, for some reason if you want to: variables = ['x', 'y', 'z'] sympy_variables = [] for v in variables: sympy_variables[i] = Symbol(v)

Re: [sympy] SymPy Workshop at FOSSASIA 2016, SIngapore

Here is a brief blog post about my experience of fossasia conference: http://iamit.in/blog/sympy-workshop-fossasia-2016/ Amit Kumar On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 10:02:00 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:51:17 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrot

Re: [sympy] SymPy Workshop at FOSSASIA 2016, SIngapore

On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:51:17 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote: > > You all should change the order to the pydy and sympy tutorials. It would > be better for people to take the sympy on first. > > Indeed, I will talk to Hong Phuc Dang (fossasia chair) and Sahil Regardi

Re: [sympy] SymPy Workshop at FOSSASIA 2016, SIngapore

Yes, Sahil's talk on "Multibody Dynamics and Control with Python" is in the same room, an hour before mine. Amit Kumar On Wednesday, March 16, 2016 at 9:49:34 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote: > > I believe Sahil will be there to present something on PyDy. > > > Jason &g

[sympy] SymPy Workshop at FOSSASIA 2016, SIngapore

up with me. :) Amit Kumar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send emai

[sympy] Re: GSoc'16 Solver and Solveset

t's very important to write a more modular and extensible transcendental equation solver. _tsolve also uses bivariate.py for most of the processing, though you can note that there aren't many direct calls to solve() in the bivariate.py except one or two, So it would be great if we could directly use (c

[sympy] SymPy Tutorial Proposal: SciPy 2016

, then please let me know. :) AMiT Kumar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send emai

[sympy] Re: Group Theory

the proposal: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2016-Student-Instructions Amit Kumar On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 1:54:38 AM UTC+5:30, Sahil Aggarwal wrote: > > Hello, > I am Sahil Aggarwal, Sophomore IIT Delhi, Mathematics and Computing. > I am new to the open source community. I w

[sympy] Re: SymPy 1.0 is released

That's a great news. Kudos SymPy Development Team! Amit Kumar On Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 1:32:33 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > I'm proud the announce that SymPy version 1.0 has been released. To > install this release use > > pip install -U sympy > > o

Re: [sympy] Trying to plot Lissajous curve to learn sympy but "TypeError: can't convert expression to float"

* t + theta) y = ampy * frictiony * sin(freqy * t) varx = {ampx:1.0, freqx:3.0, theta:pi/4.0, frictionx: frictionx} vary = {ampy:2.0, freqy:1.0, frictionx: frictionx} print x.subs(varx) plot_parametric(x.subs(varx), y.subs(vary), (t, tmin, tmax)) Hope that helps you. Best Wishes, Amit.

[sympy] Fwd: GSoC 2016 Sympy

e so i am contacing you. Please guide me Madhudeep Petwal -- *Amit Kumar* ᐧ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegro

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

On Friday, March 4, 2016 at 7:48:52 PM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote: > > >>>- Handling multidimensional sets >>> The Ideas Page states that we need to implement few functions to >>>handle multidimensional set objects. >>>We have a ProductSet class which represents Cartesian

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

18]: bool = Interval(3, 5).as_relational(x) In [19]: bool Out[19]: 3 ≤ x ∧ x ≤ 5 In [20]: bool.as_set() Out[20]: [3, 5] > >- > >Do we still have them in our codebase or has it been removed ? >Moreover, I would like to know a good usecase for this. > > Feel free to add th

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

you mentioned, I am not able to make much sense from it for implementing a special case solver. Though, when you would write your plan of execution, It may get more clear then. > There seems to be some issue with the solve_univariate_inequality function. It seems like a bug. Amit Ku

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

, as inequality solvers calls solve/solveset internally. So we need to make sure the solveset returns the correct results. Amit Kumar On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 3:07:36 PM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote: > > Hello, > > Another point I would like to know about is the state of

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 1:58:19 AM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote: > > > > On Monday, February 29, 2016 at 12:35:27 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote: >> >> >> 1. Search Based Solvers: >> >> This idea is currently vague, we need to figure out ho

[sympy] Re: SymPy is selected for GSoC!

Great News! Good work! Aaron, Ondrej, Jason! Cheers! Amit Kumar On Tuesday, March 1, 2016 at 12:37:06 AM UTC+5:30, Jason Moore wrote: > > Congrats! > > And thanks for the hard work from Aaron and Ondrej to make the new > application super good! > > https://summer

[sympy] Re: GSoC 16: Solvers

elaborate on what other features are we expecting ? See this for motivation: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/10008 Best Regards, Amit Kumar On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 7:56:31 PM UTC+5:30, Kshitij Saraogi wrote: > > Hello, > > > I am Kshitij Saraogi and I will be a GSoC

[sympy] Re: Who can mentor for GSoC?

Hi! I am willing to participate as a mentor. Regards, AMiT Kumar On Tuesday, February 9, 2016 at 2:29:41 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > GSoC organization applications are now open. We can apply as an org, but > before we do, I want to know how many people we have who can mento

[sympy] SymPy Talk at Python Delhi User Group Meetup on 5th Feb

Hi Everyone, This is to notify that I am giving a talk on SymPy at Python Delhi User Group Meetup on 5th Feb 2016 at 2:00 PM IST. If anyone would be in New Delhi tomorrow, make sure to catch up with me. :) Venue Details: Meetup Link: http://www.meetup.com/pydelhi/events/226049215/ Cheers, AMiT

[sympy] Re: SymPy Talk at Python Delhi User Group Meetup on 5th Feb

Sorry, the Date is Saturday, February 6, 2016. On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 12:56:11 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > This is to notify that I am giving a talk on SymPy at Python Delhi User > Group Meetup on 5th Feb 2016 at 2:00 PM IST. > If anyone wou

[sympy] Re: SymPy Talk at Python Delhi User Group Meetup on 5th Feb

Sorry! the Date is Saturday, February 6, 2016. On Friday, February 5, 2016 at 12:56:11 PM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote: > > Hi Everyone, > > This is to notify that I am giving a talk on SymPy at Python Delhi User > Group Meetup on 5th Feb 2016 at 2:00 PM IST. > If anyone wou

[sympy] Re: Rails Girls Summer of Code 2016,

I think we should go for it, atleast we can mentor a project or two. I guess this doesn't requires us to sponsor the student. Amit Kumar On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 at 8:40:15 PM UTC+5:30, Sumith 1896 wrote: > > Hi all, > > Rails Girls Summer of Code(http://railsgirlssumm

Re: [sympy] Re: SymPy at PyDelhi Conference 2016

Hi Gaurav & Sartaj! Great to know you will join us there! Cheers, AMiT Kumar On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 10:09:00 PM UTC+5:30, Gaurav Dhingra wrote: > > Hi Amit and Sartaj, > > I have now been given push access to SymPy. So can i possibly join you > guys at the

[sympy] SymPy at PyDelhi Conference 2016

s/symbolic-computation-with-python-using-sympy/ Feel free to suggest changes. If anyone of you would be in New Delhi on 5th March 2016, make sure to catch up with me. :) Cheers, AMiT Kumar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group.

[sympy] Re: Contribute to Sympy

/sympy/labels/Easy%20to%20Fix AMiT Kumar On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 8:02:53 PM UTC+5:30, madhur modi wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I'm a 2nd year student of IIIT hyderabad. I want to start my contribution > to sympy org. I have knowledge of python programming and higher mathemati

[sympy] Re: Contribution to sympy

/sympy/labels/Easy%20to%20Fix AMiT Kumar On Sunday, December 6, 2015 at 11:23:29 PM UTC+5:30, Aditya Vyas wrote: > > Hello, > I am in my second year of college in engineering. I am entirely new to > open source world. I want to participate in GSOC 16 by contributing to this > organ

[sympy] Re: Contribution to Sympy

%20Fix AMiT Kumar On Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 11:45:18 AM UTC+5:30, Harshvardhan Tibrewal wrote: > > Dear Developers, > I want to contribute to Sympy. I have knowledge of algebra calculus(etc) > and I know python programming. I would like to learn and improve my skills > under y

Re: [sympy] SymPy at PyCon India 2015

I will put the T-Shirt design on SymPy wiki for future printing. :) AMiT Kumar On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 9:41:39 PM UTC+5:30, Ondřej Čertík wrote: > > Nice shirts indeed! > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Aaron Meurer <asme...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >

Re: [sympy] Re: Doing a release

eed to decide the behavior deprecation policy for `solve`. AMiT Kumar On Wednesday, September 2, 2015 at 5:37:01 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > The current plan is not to deprecate the old assumptions syntax, but to > allow both. In fact, in master, ask(Q.real(x)) will call x.is_real (it a

[sympy] Re: Doing a release

Hi, Can we delay 1.0 with some other version like 0.8 or so? It would be nice if have atleast the solve mess being fixed in 1.0 Also we have yet not settled with a single assumption system. AMiT Kumar On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 11:25:31 PM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: > > It has come

[sympy] Re: GSoC winding down

Thanks to whole SymPy team and Community for a wonderful collaboration experience. Kudos! Here is my Report: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Report-Amit-Kumar-:-Solvers *AMiT Kumar* On Monday, August 24, 2015 at 1:30:00 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: The GSoC period is now

Re: [sympy] Mathematical substitution in SymPy

I am also Interested in getting the solution for this. *AMiT Kumar* On Friday, August 14, 2015 at 12:08:25 PM UTC+5:30, Gaurav Dhingra wrote: Do you want something like replacing some function f1 (say `exponential function` you mentioned `{exp(x): x}` ) with some other f2 (say linear

[sympy] Re: Question about LU decomposition for non-square and non-invertible matrices

would surely help. *AMiT Kumar* On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 11:09:06 PM UTC+5:30, Tom H wrote: Hi Amit, Thanks for the speedy response! If I understand the code in gauss_jordan_solve correctly, solving A*x=b with multiple right hand sides requires a call to gauss_jordan_solve for each

[sympy] Re: Question about LU decomposition for non-square and non-invertible matrices

/sympy -- *AMiT Kumar* On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 4:53:15 AM UTC+5:30, Tom H wrote: I came across the following issue when trying to use Sympy to compute an LU decomposition of a matrix. I'd like to determine the number of solutions a system of equations has, for example

[sympy] Documenting Solveset: The new 'Solver'

about solveset, please add a comment on: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9500 Thanks, *AMiT Kumar* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr

Re: [sympy] Does sympify has an upper limit of number of variables?

|q|r|s|t|u|v|w|x|y|z|A|B|C|D|E|F|G|H|I|J|K|L|M|K')) Or(A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, q, r, s, t, u, v, w, x, y, z) sympy has a function, N: sympy.N function N at 0x7f2437adfb70 sympy.N.__module__ 'sympy.core.evalf' Best, Amit. -- You

[sympy] Re: Introducing package maintainers

at-least 6-7 people taking up, as interested for helping out with the responsibilities in a non-formal way. *AMiT Kumar* On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 5:18:54 PM UTC+5:30, Kalevi Suominen wrote: On Monday, July 13, 2015 at 4:11:30 AM UTC+3, Jason Moore wrote: After discussions at SciPy, we decided

[sympy] Re: Complement(FiniteSet, FiniteSet)

That's a *bug*. The behavior of FiniteSet while having symbolic elements into it was recently changed here: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9540 So, the new behavior, is yet not implemented for all other operations, that's probably one of the reasons for this. *AMiT Kumar* On Saturday

[sympy] Google Hangout during SciPy 2015 SymPy Sprints

good, almost most of us made there including Sumith, Sartaj, Sahil me. Thanks, *AMiT Kumar* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr

[sympy] Re: Absolute value removal

Hi brombo, The simplest thing, I can think of as of now: In [23]: a = (Abs(sin(w))/cos(w)) + Abs(w) In [24]: S(str(a).replace('Abs', '')) Out[24]: w + sin(w)/cos(w) *AMiT Kumar* On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 5:57:15 PM UTC+5:30, brombo wrote: Is there a simple way of removing all absolute

Re: [sympy] Re: Absolute value removal

On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 8:53:45 PM UTC+5:30, Renato Coutinho wrote: Wouldn't it be better to use a = Abs(sin(w))/cos(w) + Abs(w) a.replace(Abs, Id) rather than deal with strings? Yes, that is certainly better, I couldn't recall this, earlier. Thanks! *AMiT Kumar* -- You

Re: [sympy] Re: Interesting library for generating visualizations on open source communities

On Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 1:59:01 AM UTC+5:30, Joachim Durchholz wrote: Am 08.07.2015 um 21:59 schrieb Aaron Meurer: Here is the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdFYj9NwD3g That video is private, so outsiders can't see it. Yesterday, It was public. *AMiT Kumar* -- You

[sympy] Fwd: utilities.autowrap.ufuncify fails with symbol lists of length = 32

believe the issue on the Google Group is different to the one I'm reporting here. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/sympy/ufuncify/sympy/kgzcR8Qu7s4/RAGTw7A0I3oJ I'm running sympy 0.7.6-1, which I installed via the Canopy Package Manager on OSX Yosemite 10.10.3, 64 bit. *AMiT Kumar

[sympy] Re: Eigen Vectors and Cramers methods in sympy

Hi Kakarla, See this: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/9550#issuecomment-113738681 *AMiT Kumar* On Tuesday, June 23, 2015 at 4:58:41 AM UTC+5:30, Kakarla Dinesh wrote: Why don't we have Cramers Method and Computation of Eigen Vectors in Sympy -- You received this message because you

Re: [sympy] Intersection of FiniteSets having symbols

Apart from stats module, few more tests are Failing: https://travis-ci.org/sympy/sympy/builds/67354711 -- AMiT Kumar On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 1:58:02 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: What exactly fails in the stats module? My guess is that the sets module will need to be able to have

[sympy] Re: Checking the flag value passed with calling

Hi! The default value of evaluate in Point class is True, which means Floats are automatically converted to Rational unless the evaluate flag is False. Point(0.5, 0.25) # default is evaluate=True Point(1/2, 1/4) Point(0.5, 0.25, evaluate=False) Point(0.5, 0.25) *AMiT Kumar

Re: [sympy] Expressing equation in terms of variables

at instead? Is this what you want? First find m in terms of F and a: m1 = solve(F-m*a, m, dict=True)[0][m] Now, feed in above to the second equation: solve(rho - m1/v, a) [F/(rho*v)] Best, Amit. Thank you. In [6]: from sympy import * In [11]: f = Symbol('f') m = Symbol('m

Re: [sympy] How to equip a Symbol with an additional attribute?

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:56 PM, Carsten Knoll carstenkn...@gmx.de wrote: I want to equip an Symbol with an additional attribute to store some specific information right in place. For 'normal' Python classes it is no problem to dynamically create an additional attribute for an already

Re: [sympy] Checking an expression is an inequality

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Aaron Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Amit Saha amitsaha...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Is this the best way to check whether an expression is an inequality ? Yes, except note that Relational can also be Eq(). Thanks

Re: [sympy] Re: gen argument in sympy.solvers.inequalities.solve_univariate_inequality

On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 5:56:17 PM UTC+5:30, Amit Saha wrote: On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:01 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi Amit, The `gen` argument corresponds to the symbol you are solving for the univariate inequality (expr). Example

[sympy] Checking an expression is an inequality

to be imported from sympy instead of having to do: from sympy.core.relational import Relational ? Thanks, Amit. -- http://echorand.me -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

Re: [sympy] Unifying the inequality solvers

solve_univariate_inequality(ineq_obj , x, relational=False) # polynomial print(isolve(x+20)) # rational function print(isolve((x-1)/(x+2)0)) # non-polynomial, non-rational print(isolve(sin(x)-1 0)) What do you think of it now? One limitation is that I am assuming the variable is x. -Amit

Re: [sympy] Re: gen argument in sympy.solvers.inequalities.solve_univariate_inequality

On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 7:01 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Amit, The `gen` argument corresponds to the symbol you are solving for the univariate inequality (expr). Example: solve_univariate_inequality(x**2 = 4, x) Or(And(-oo x, x = -2), And(2 = x, x oo

[sympy] Unifying the inequality solvers

function. Best, Amit. -- http://echorand.me -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy

[sympy] Re: gen argument in sympy.solvers.inequalities.solve_univariate_inequality

Hi Amit, The `gen` argument corresponds to the symbol you are solving for the univariate inequality (expr). Example: solve_univariate_inequality(x**2 = 4, x) Or(And(-oo x, x = -2), And(2 = x, x oo)) solve_univariate_inequality(x**2 = 4, x, relational=False) (-oo, -2] U [2, oo

[sympy] gen argument in sympy.solvers.inequalities.solve_univariate_inequality

Hi all, What does the gen argument mean in the context of solve_univariate_inequality(expr, gen, relational=True) [1] ? [1] http://docs.sympy.org/dev/modules/solvers/inequalities.html#sympy.solvers.inequalities.solve_univariate_inequality Thanks, Amit. -- http://echorand.me -- You

[sympy] Re: solveset(): solveset function not following symbol constraint

, which is still in development. Hopefully, soon we will have both of these tied together. AMiT Kumar 3rd Year Undergrad Delhi Technological University www.iamit.in On Sunday, May 3, 2015 at 4:06:56 PM UTC+5:30, Gaurav Dhingra wrote: Hi everyone from sympy import * from

Re: [sympy] Should declaring an assumption restrict values substituted?

On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 24.04.2015 um 00:02 schrieb Jason Moore: That makes sense, but I'm not sure whether Garbage in - Garbage Out should apply or whether SymPy should throw and error. If something is invalid, the user needs to be

Re: [sympy] Should declaring an assumption restrict values substituted?

, it could be quite expensive. I think it would be useful to at least have an option to subs to check this though. Like, subs(.., strict=True) ? Aaron Meurer On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:23 AM, Joachim Durchholz j...@durchholz.org wrote: Am 23.04.2015 um 23:57 schrieb Amit Saha: My thinking is if x

[sympy] Should declaring an assumption restrict values substituted?

Hi all, Let's say I have a symbol: x = Symbol('x', positive=True) Should the below substitution be permitted: (x+1).subs({x:-5}) -4 My thinking is if x is declared to be positive, substituting negative values should result in an error. Does that make sense? Best, Amit. -- http

Re: [sympy] Definite getting started document for assumptions

assumptions in general - not related to SymPy but in symbolic math that someone knows of? Thanks, Amit. -- http://echorand.me -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [sympy] Re: Sympy limit - result depends on the sign

On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Paul Royik distantjob...@gmail.com wrote: Yes. Is there any way to tell, that t1 ? I believe, no. I asked this sometime back. [1] [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/?utm_medium=emailutm_source=footer#!msg/sympy/FC4cCBdKrs0/PJ9WgPzpIhUJ On Friday, April

[sympy] Re: Bug with inverse hyperbolic cosine 'acosh'

Yes, It is a bug Indeed. Thanks for reporting. Fixed in this PR: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/9231 Please have a look. *Reference:* http://functions.wolfram.com/ElementaryFunctions/ArcCosh/02/ http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ArcCosh%5B-z%5D On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 8:10:18 PM

[sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

and suggest changes, I have fixed the formatting as well. AMiT Kumar 3rd Year Undergrad Delhi Technological University www.iamit.in On Friday, February 6, 2015 at 12:08:45 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote: Hi, I am AMiT Kumar, I would be GSoC Applicant to SymPy this year. I have been following

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

Thanks Chris, for pointing me to that PR, I did had a look at that. That PR, exposed me to the mess of solving linear systems in solvers. AMiT Kumar On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 8:07:00 PM UTC+5:30, Chris Smith wrote: See also https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2580 which started some work

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

when you submit your proposal in Melange. I would just try to make it look as good as possible in Melange, and provide a link to the wiki so people can read it there. Aaron Meurer On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 1:39 PM, AMiT Kumar dtu@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hi

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

It looks good only while preview in Melange, but doesn't renders same formatting, when It's submitted. AMiT Kumar On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 7:43:33 AM UTC+5:30, AMiT Kumar wrote: @Aaron @Jason On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 7:19:14 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: If the Malange form

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

') # classify by univariate and multivariate if len(free_symbols) == 1: phints.append('univariate') elif len(free_symbols) 1: phints.append('multivariate') return phints Thanks, AMiT Kumar On Tuesday, March 17, 2015 at 1:44:38 AM UTC+5:30, Aaron Meurer wrote: Sorry

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

Hi, Sorry for late reply, (I was busy with Mid terms Assignments). Based on the above Ideas, I have made the draft of my Proposal on SymPy wiki, Please have a look: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2015-Application-AMiT-Kumar--Solvers-:-Extending-Solveset Thanks, AMiT Kumar 3rd

Re: [sympy] Re: Definite getting started document for assumptions

that is underway. But it is far from complete. This blog gives a pretty good explanation of what the new assumptions system is going to be. Thank you. Exactly what I was looking for. On Saturday, 14 March 2015 03:32:33 UTC+5:30, Amit Saha wrote: Hi, From a sympy user's perspective

[sympy] Definite getting started document for assumptions

for a Symbol? I think there is a new assumptions implementation in the works - what are the main changes that are going to happen? Thanks and apologies if I missed to look at the right places. Best, Amit. -- http://echorand.me -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

As of now, I am doing an Audit of solving of Linear systems to tackle this Problem. Cheers! AMiT Kumar 3rd Year Undergrad Delhi Technological University www.iamit.in -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups sympy group. To unsubscribe from this group

Re: [sympy] Re: [GSoC 2015] Solvers : Extending Solveset

solvers, without messing with the others, and we will have a more robust and flexible framework which will be easy to extend. I think, building a robust framework, which felicitates further development, worth much more than adding new solvers. Thoughts from the community are invited. AMiT Kumar

  1   2   3   >