05:01 AM UTC+2, chris...@kwyk.fr
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hum, tests are currently running on my computer and some to fail.
>>>
>>> Some only need updates, like sympy/core/tests/test_evaluate.py which
>>> explicitly refer to evaluate = False current b
valuate = False current behavior. Some other tests
> seem to fail without apparent reasons. I will investigate this before doing
> a PR.
>
> Thank you for your reply,
> Christophe Gabard
>
> On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:48:47 AM UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> Are
.
Thank you for your reply,
Christophe Gabard
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 10:48:47 AM UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Are there any other tests that fail if you make the change?
>
> I would look into the git history to see what changes added those tests if
> they made any justifica
ob/master/sympy/core/operations.py#L31
after the if on line 33.
I prefer to ask the question here before because the presence of the tests
can make believe that this behavior is voluntary.
Christophe Gabard
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy&qu
eb visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/5f86b9c7-1ace-410c-aeb7-c57f505c42ff%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/5f86b9c7-1ace-410c-aeb7-c57f505c42ff%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.
For more options, visit https://groups.google
Hello.
I play a little with Sympy Gamma and I think that it would be better to
not show sympy commands by default.
It should be better to decide to hide them and to have the possibility
to show sympy commands if we want it.
Just a suggestion. ;-)
--
Christophe BAL
Enseignant Agrégé
normal form if it exists ?
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French teacher of **math** in a high school **and **amateur **Python *
*developer*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy"
Hello.
Have you try factorization ?
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French teacher of **math** in a high school **and **amateur **Python *
*developer*
2016-06-06 14:55 GMT+02:00 Richard Fateman :
> I don't understand why
Hello.
It should be fairly easy to transform the sympy output into a Graphviz file.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French teacher of **math** in a high school **and **amateur **Python *
*developer*
2016-04-06 23:32 GMT+02:00
Hello
As a teacher in a high school, I think that a non modal window would be
really useful.
Le 24 mars 2016 06:46, "Aman Deep" a écrit :
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
> I was finally able to integrate mathquill with latex2sympy in the Jupyter
> notebook.
>
>
> Here is a screenshot showing a Mathematical e
Hello.
I would like to use Sympy si as to do step by step calculations. My idea
would be to pay with the tree of expressions.
Does the tree API is rich enough for example to fins subtree ?
C.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubs
e inverse laplace transform becomes:
>
> k*e^(-p1*t) / (p1-p2) + k*e^(-p2*t) / (p1-p2)
>
> *which is what I prefer.* It is weird to me that adding a constant 'k'
> change the form that Sympy chooses to show the result.
>
> On Friday, January 1, 2016 at 2:46:19 AM UTC-5,
Hello.
Have you triez to expand 1nd then to factorize the formula ?
Le 1 janv. 2016 03:42, "Ken" a écrit :
> I've just started learning Sympy. I wrote a few lines of code to perform a
> inverse laplace transform on a simple 2nd order transfunction:
>
> H(s) = 1 / ((s+p1) * (s+p2)).
>
> The resul
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > The new operator @ could be usez to define composition of two functions :
> > g@f(x) = g(f(x)).
> >
> > Bad or good idea ?
> >
> > --
> > You receive
Hello.
The new operator @ could be usez to define composition of two functions :
g@f(x) = g(f(x)).
Bad or good idea ?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hello.
Have you tried this ?
*from sympy import **
*class f(Function):*
*is_real = True*
*x = Symbol('x',real=True)*
*df = f.diff(x)*
*print(re(df))*
*print(im(df))*
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math
Hello.
All of this is normal. If you use for example print(latex(x**2/2,
mode='equation*')), you will have the expected behavior.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python
I also vote for the TypeError.
Le 31 mai 2015 23:17, "Joachim Durchholz" a écrit :
> Am 31.05.2015 um 22:50 schrieb Aaron Meurer:
>
>> Perhaps we should make derivatives of booleans give TypeError. That
>> would make it much easier to see what is going on.
>>
>
> +1
>
> Similarly, integer-valued
And because *x^x* means *x xor x* which numeric value is *0* or *1*
so the derivative is equal to zero.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
--
Yo
Hello.
I think that the 2nd writing will be hard to handle in more complex
calculus. Maybe the three possibilities should be available if an
assumption is made on x.
A simple user.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math
Why am I french ? I feel so sorry to be too far from LA...
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2015-05-11 19:28 GMT+02:00 Brian Granger :
> Hi all,
&g
Hello.
Thanks a lot for the guru's tips about local PRs.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2015-04-02 17:52 GMT+02:00 Aaron Meurer :
> You can
atom.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2015-04-02 11:06 GMT+02:00 Francesco Bonazzi :
>
>
> On Wednesday, April 1, 2015 at 11:35:40 PM UTC+2, C
Hello.
I'm learning git and I have a question abut the way the core developers of
sympy manages the multiple pull requests with potential conflict. How do
you do that ?
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a &
Hello.
Maybe, it could be useful to have a abssimplify method that will try to
simplify abs expressions.
Christophe BAL
Le 11 févr. 2015 11:54, "Arnaud Usciati" a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I found another error limit :
> If x = symbols('x', positive=True),
Hello.
Have you tried to simplify exp_1 - exp_2 to see if it is equal to zero ?
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2015-02-10 9:20 GMT+01:00 Peter :
>
Ok. In that case, summation(exp(a*x), (x, 1.2, 1.5)) = 0 is a normal
feature.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2015-02-03 9:11 GMT+01:00 Gaurav Dhingra :
.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2015-02-03 9:01 GMT+01:00 Gaurav Dhingra :
> Hi,
> I want to know about the "summation" function used in
Hello.
If I am not wrong, sympy prefers (-x + y) to (y - x) because a lexical
order is used.
*Christophe BAL*
*Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur*
*---*
*French math teacher in a "Lycée" **and **Python **amateur developer*
2014-12-13 0:46 GMT+01
Hello.
Have you considered a text in a matplotlib graph ?
Le 17 nov. 2014 13:51, "Alan Bromborsky" a écrit :
> If you would send me an example of your code I might be able to suggest
> a solution.
>
>
> On 11/17/2014 03:13 AM, jeanbigbo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I'd love to be able to save a symp
aining the binary approximations used in
the float format, and also the approximations made to do the binary sum.
On the other hand, it is easier to start with 0.1 and 1/10. I will add it
in my doc before talking about 0.1+0.2.
Christophe BAL
Le 31 oct. 2014 21:19, "Richard Fateman"
I definitely like this example !
Christophe BAL
2014-10-31 17:33 GMT+01:00 Aaron Meurer :
> Here is a nice example
> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/YpV5tyLvWe4/WWRYOTMNIhIJ. It
> shows great precision loss when evaluating Legendre polynomials
> naively. Unlike Wilkinson&
Thanks for this hint. If I find revelant example, I will post them in this
discussion.
2014-10-31 17:38 GMT+01:00 Aaron Meurer :
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the answers.
> >
> > Maybe integration will be a good candidate.
to a formula containing arctan whereas my solution do not
use it, and was more simple. The problem is that I have not noted this
example...
Maybe solving some polynomial of degree 3 can give such "complicated"
formulas that a human would not use.
Christophe BAL
2014-10-30 23:53 GMT+01:
software works (like floating point precision loss).
Christophe BAL
2014-10-31 0:04 GMT+01:00 Richard Fateman :
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 3:38:47 AM UTC-7, Christophe Bal wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'm writing a french book about SageMathClou
rithmetic in SymPy.
>
> [1]: [How Futile are Mindless Assessments of Roundoff in
> Floating-Point Computation?](
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/Mindless.pdf)
>
> On 29 October 2014 16:08, Christophe Bal wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I'm writing a french
Hello.
I'm looking for formal outputs that are not calculated as a human can do
(this is for a free french "book"). Do you know such kind of examples ?
Christophe BAL
PS : this questions has been posted on both Sage and Sympy lists.
--
You received this message because you ar
#x27;ve already posted this question on the Sage list without a lot of success.
Christophe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubsc
+1
C.
2014-10-28 17:29 GMT+01:00 Aaron Meurer :
> Being open source is definitely a plus for SymPy here. The authors
> could have stepped through SymPy with a debugger to help figure out
> their problem, and submitted a pull request for a fix once they found
> it.
>
> It's not always possible, o
Just done.
2014-10-03 21:35 GMT+02:00 Sergey Kirpichev :
>
>
> On Thursday, October 2, 2014 5:02:10 PM UTC+4, Christophe Bal wrote:
>>
>> For me the fact that 1/3 == S(1)/3 has value True sounds like a bug
>> because 1/3 is a float, and S(1)/3 a rational.
&g
Yes but the set of floats is not even a sub ring of the set of rational
numbers.
2014-10-03 5:43 GMT+02:00 Richard Fateman :
>
>
> On Thursday, October 2, 2014 11:11:14 AM UTC-7, Christophe Bal wrote:
>>
>> And what about the following code ?
>>
>> The user
Sorry, indeed I was looking for a solution for IPython notebook. In that
case, the solution dose not work. I have the following error message.
=
---
MultipleInstanceError Traceback (mos
the same memory location.
>
>
>
> RJF
>
>
> On Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:02:10 AM UTC-7, Christophe Bal wrote:
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> For me the fact that 1/3 == S(1)/3 has value True sounds like a bug
>> because 1/3 is a float, and S(
True)
>>
>>
>> Jason
>> moorepants.info
>> +01 530-601-9791
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Christophe Bal
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> is there a way to have the features given by isympy -i in IPython ?
>>>
>&
Hello.
For me the fact that 1/3 == S(1)/3 has value True sounds like a bug
because 1/3 is a float, and S(1)/3 a rational.
Christophe BAL
=== PYTHON ===
from sympy import *
a = 1/3
b = S(1)/3
print(a)
print(b)
print(a == b)
print(type(a))
print(type(b))
--- OUTPUT
Hello,
is there a way to have the features given by isympy -i in IPython ?
Christoohe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegro
n), {f(0): 1})
> Out[28]:
> n
> a ⋅(a + b - 1) b
> ── - ─
> a - 1a - 1
>
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Is it possible to ask to Sympy to give for
question on sage list and one user points me to
Sympy.
Christophe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To po
Hello.
There is n! permutations of a set of n elements and n! ~ sqrt(2 pi n)
(n/e)^n due to the Stirling's approximation. So you can expect to have all
the permuations with not small value of n.
Christophe BAL
2014-09-12 18:07 GMT+02:00 Aaron Meurer :
> SymPy can make use of
Hello.
I do not know if it is the case but I think that sympy should have a domain
method for expressions. This will avoid error like for example float
calculations raising to 1 for example that wi-ould not be a natural but a
float.
C.
2014-06-21 17:08 GMT+02:00 Saurabh Jha :
> I think that ma
Hello.
Does your equation solvable symbolically ? At a first glance, I don't think.
C.
2014-06-16 10:39 GMT+02:00 Camille Chambon :
> Hello,
>
> I would like to find
> c2
> as
> 0.66 + 0.34 * (1 + 1.0 / c2) - 1.0 / ln(1 + c2) - 0.7 == 0
> Thus I used the function
> solve
> like so:
> c2 = Symb
Hello.
What do you want to do ?
Christophe BAL
2014-06-11 16:34 GMT+02:00 Amit Saha :
> Hello,
>
> I am looking for the simplest SymPy alternative to this:
>
> >>> import itertools
> >>> for p in itertools.permutations([1, 2, 4]):
> ... print(p)
&
Hello.
>>> in Mathematica I can just do expr /.{x_*Conj[x_] -> Abs[x]^2}
With an easy to use treeview class, I do not think that it will be too hard
to implement a method that can acheive this kind of using something like
expr.replace(x_*Conj[x_], Abs[x]^2)
Christophe BAL
--
You r
A easy to use treeview will be a great tool. No ?
2014-06-06 19:52 GMT+02:00 F. B. :
> I think that SymPy needs a better term rewriting system. And also a better
> pattern matcher.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscrib
gt; And then I suppose one could re-write the expressions in a more
> user-friendly form?
> What do you propose, Chris?
>
>
> On Friday, June 6, 2014 2:16:15 PM UTC+2, Christophe Bal wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> All the receipts in this dicussion look very interes
Hello.
All the receipts in this dicussion look very interesting.Maybe all of this
ones could be put in the official documentation.
Christophe BAL
2014-06-06 13:34 GMT+02:00 Andrei Berceanu :
> The unflatten_mul function factorized the 2, but not the g, i.e. it returns
>
> 2(g*|psi
Thanks for this usefull pedagogical tool.
Christophe BAL
2014-05-06 2:36 GMT+02:00 Stefan Krastanov :
> You might find this interesting for debugging and code-diving.
>
>
> https://zvzzt.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/python-recursion-visualization-with-rcviz/
>
> --
> You
Hello.
The following terminal session shows a problem with the ASCII printing
because the two last lines.
At least, I would expect the use of *S(1)* in the *repr* which is a
technical output from my point of view. What do you think about this ?
Christophe BAL
If I use *S(1)/4* or *1./4*, all works as expected.
I have understood that is normal because 1/4 is an euclidean division.
Sorry, I always use Python 3 where 1/4 is a float division.
2014-05-04 15:24 GMT+02:00 Christophe Bal :
> Hello.
>
> The folowing code gives a wrong output i
Hello.
The folowing code gives a wrong output in IPython. Indeed the fraction 1/4
disapears...
Christophe BAL
*-*
*from sympy import **
*init_printing()*
*x = var("x")*
*f = x**3 + cos(x+1/4)*
*print f*
--
You received this message because you are subscri
" question. ;-)
Christophe
2014-04-05 9:23 GMT+02:00 F. B. :
>
> On Thursday, April 3, 2014 5:04:36 PM UTC+2, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> Some people on this list might be interested in this https://github.com/
>> ContinuumIO/pyalge.
>>
>
>
> Indeed, that can be v
Joachim Durchholz :
> Am 29.03.2014 14:38, schrieb Christophe Bal:
>
> Does Sympy supports something like Decimal("1.234") of the standard module
>> decimal ? This could do the job.
>>
>
> If that conversion goes through a Python float, this would already incu
Does Sympy supports something like Decimal("1.234") of the standard module
decimal ? This could do the job.
On the other hand, Sympy should print something like Float("1.234", 10) so
as to say to the user that a float with a mantisse of 10 digits is used.
Good or wrong advices ? Is it feasible ?
>>> [...] what you could do is take any "float" and convert it
>>> to an exactly equal numeric quantity that is a sympy rational.
>>> And you could take that number and convert it to a float.
>>> without loss.
There is a little with this approach. The float algorithm are generally
more efficient
>> You can prove that any valid IEEE float is a rational
No ! Why ? Because of the arithmetic rules. You can have approximation to
do. With decimals, you have to do exact calculations.
Christophe BAL.
2014-03-23 22:02 GMT+01:00 Richard Fateman :
> You can prove that any valid IEEE
>>> Mathematically, all floats are rational numbers.
>>> They can be written as * 2 ^.
That is not true. Why ? Because of the arithmetic operations. See the
preceding mail for an example.
Mathematically, there is not set of floats. The floats are a lot more
complex, that is not a bad play on wo
Hello.
There is a difference between a decimal, ie a rational which can be written
N/10^P and a float. A float number is an approximation so you can't really
see it as rationals. No ?
Christophe BAL
2014-03-20 22:35 GMT+01:00 Aaron Meurer :
> Can you think of a fact in the assumption
I have a Mac and I can see all the official examples of Three.js.
Christophe BAL
2014-03-18 18:13 GMT+01:00 SAHIL SHEKHAWAT :
> Jason,
> But all the browser do support HTML Canvas right?
> and Three.js uses it as a fallback option if there is no WebGL.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18
Do not forget that "fixed" pictures are useful for paper reports. On the
other hand, I think that using web browsers for sliders is the better
solution to use actually because of the dynamical features and the JS
library that helps to build such sliders.
--
You received this message because you a
This MathBox is just amazing !
2014-03-18 11:12 GMT+01:00 Christophe Bal :
> Sorry for the poorness of my english. Indeed when I wrote "formulas" I
> think about "legends containing formulas".
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Goo
Sorry for the poorness of my english. Indeed when I wrote "formulas" I
think about "legends containing formulas".
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+
>>> With three.js we always have an option to fall back
>>> to html canvas which every browser support ( specially IE7 ).
I didn't know that. The problem that you will met with three.js is the
suport of formulas.
2014-03-18 10:52 GMT+01:00 SAHIL SHEKHAWAT :
> Th
This dependencies are due to the fact that this project focuses on datas.
I've pointed to this project just for the "philosophy" of this project.
If you want to propose a "JS viewer", you "just" have to translate Sympy
plot to the syntax of D3.js and/or three.js or another free JS library.
This is
Hello,
you can also look at Bokeh <http://bokeh.pydata.org/>.
Christophe BAL
2014-03-18 8:50 GMT+01:00 SAHIL SHEKHAWAT :
> I have been working on a proposal to implement 3D plotting in SymPyGamma,
> and Jason pointed me to the importance of d3.js and Three.js backend in
> the S
Thanks for this.
2014-03-10 23:39 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
> Sorry - I sent the message too early accidentally:
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Matthew Brett
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> >&g
Thanks 2.
2014-03-10 23:12 GMT+01:00 someone :
> Hi,
>
>
> > is there someone on this list that knows a good book reference about
> > the Karr summation algorithm ?
>
> There are about 3 references which are more than a research paper:
>
> 1.) Symbolic Summation in Difference Fields (Karr + mode
Matthew, could you send me the code you use to build the DMG ?
-
sympy.test() is too simple for a french brain. :-) The tests give only one
warning and one error.
*WARNING*
sympy/core/tests/test_args.py[572]
/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.3/lib/python3.3/site-packag
2014-03-10 20:07 GMT+01:00 Matthew Brett :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Aaron Meurer wrote:
> > Can you point to this discussion?
> >
> > Aaron Meurer
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> >> Hello.
uot;/" as elementwise-division."*.
Indeed, I just talk about +, - and /.
Best regards.
Christophe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
Hi Comer.
Thanks a lot for this reference.
Christophe
2014-03-10 15:12 GMT+01:00 Comer :
> Hi Christophe,
>
> I found the attached article. There is a reference to another on the same
> topic in JACM in 1981 but I did not find that (yet). I am attaching the
> 1985 article.
which use more and more Python.
Christophe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, sen
Hello.
I've just seen that NumPy and matplotlib proposes a dmg installer for
Python 3. This is very usefull.
Is there just one dmg for SymPy ? If not, maybe the setup in the source
codes of NumPy and matplotlib could help to build such a dmg for SymPy.
Best regards.
C.
--
You received this mes
Hello,
is there someone on this list that knows a good book reference about the
Karr summation algorithm ?
Christophe BAL
2014-03-10 0:12 GMT+01:00 someone :
> Hi,
>
> > I am Pritam.
> > I want implement the Karr algorithm for the google summer of code
> > 2014 sympy
.
On the other hand, we also have to heard that the elementwise multipication
is often used.
The most important thing will be to have a good choice.
Best regards.
Christophe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe
ion can use something like ° that could be
better because it is near from the dot scalar of two vectors. *I do not
think that @ is really intuitive. *
A math user of Sympy, Numpy and Scipy that will note appreciate to use @
for the matrix multiplication.
Christophe BAL
2014-03-09 8:54 G
z-plane must be changed to xy-plane. Sorry for this.
2014-03-05 10:26 GMT+01:00 Christophe Bal :
> I've a little suggestion about planar object into a 3D scene.
>
> *O = Point(2, 3, 4)*
> *I = Point(4, 5, 4)*
> J = Point(2, 3, 7)
>
> *line = Line(Point(2,3), Point(
r scene in any plane rather in the fixed
z-plane. The function could use a list of 2D-objects and returns the
corresponding new objects build.
Christophe, a simple user.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from
Sorry for my message, I was drunk... ;-)
2014-03-04 21:32 GMT+01:00 Akshay :
>
> c=Line(Point(2,3), Point(3,5)) # Here the default value of z is taken as 0
>> I meant that the z co-ordinate of the point is taken as 0.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Hello.
In your prototype, you have written :
b.arbitrary_point('z') = Point(-13*z +5, -11*z+5, -8z+5)
c=Line(Point(2,3), Point(3,5)) # Here the default value of z is taken as 0
Why don't you work with a symbolic variable z ?
You will also have to take care of point in segment for example.
20
Thanks for this two answers.
Christophe
2014-03-04 20:25 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Paprocki :
> Hi,
>
> On 3 March 2014 16:30, Christophe Bal wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > Is there an equivalent of FullForm that produces simple treeview of a
> > formula ? Here
ot; should be treated as a complex. By
giving an integer id for the kind of a number, and by choosing integer_id <
rational_id < reals_id < imaginary_id < complexe_id, then the kind of
number could be the maximum of all the id met in an expression.
What do you think about that ?
Christop
Hello.
Is there an equivalent of FullForm that produces simple treeview of a
formula ? Here is basic example seen in a video.
FullForm[x**2+x**3] = Plus[Power[x, 2], Power[y, 3]]
Best regards.
Christophe BAL
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"
ython
parser.
Christophe BAL
Le 26 févr. 2014 01:10, "Aaron Meurer" a écrit :
> Previous PEPs have tried this and failed. This PEP is an attempt at a
> compromise that suits the community's needs but still has potential to
> be accepted by the BDFL.
>
> Aaron Meurer
Hello.
Can you give a little example showing how to define an infix operator in
Haskell ?
Christophe
Le 26 févr. 2014 00:02, "Sergey Kirpichev" a écrit :
> On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 8:31:02 PM UTC+4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>>
>> Some people on this list might be inter
Thanks for the explanations.
2014-02-23 14:46 GMT+01:00 Aditya Shah :
> Hi Sachin,
> While I do agree that inclusion of NLP parser would be a big project in
> itself. But if implemented even as an add-on, it can be used to augment the
> capabilities of Sympy Live.
>
> Btw just a quick question:
Hello.
How will you evaluate thé probability of à language?
Christophe, a simple user.
Le 23 févr. 2014 04:19, "Aditya Shah" a écrit :
I would like to discuss my plan of action to develop the general parsing
framework for Sympy. Right now the code is quite messy. The modules for
Thanks for this reference.
Christophe
Le 19 févr. 2014 00:39, "someone" a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
> > what is the origin of this name gruntz ?
>
> "On Computing Limits in a Symbolic Manipulation System":
>
> ftp://ftp.inf.ethz.ch/doc/dissertations/th11
Hello,
as a simple user, I think the support of conic and quadratic is also needed
for 2D and 3D geometry.
There is also a need to allow a way to put a 2D context into the 3D one.
Christophe BAL
2014-02-18 20:32 GMT+01:00 Akshay :
> Hello,
> The current geometry module supports a 2-d
Thanks.
I've just tried
2014-02-18 13:20 GMT+01:00 Sergey Kirpichev :
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:51:50 PM UTC+4, Christophe Bal wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>> what is the origin of this name gruntz ?
>>
>
> From the name of algorithm author.
>
&g
rter, but it does
> have a bad tendency to give wrong answers when gruntz() works just
> fine.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Christophe Bal
> wrote:
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-17 19:21 GMT+01:00 Avichal Da
1 - 100 of 242 matches
Mail list logo
