Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

GSoC >>> contributor would receive. It would be up to Francesco and other >>> community members if he is interested in helping out with this >>> project. >>> >>> Aaron Meurer >>> >>> On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 7:58 PM Samith Kavishke >>

Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

C > contributor would receive. It would be up to Francesco and other > community members if he is interested in helping out with this > project. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 7:58 PM Samith Kavishke > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > Eventhough have

Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

Hi, Eventhough have not been selected, do we still have a chance to continue the project? Without the stipend. On Tuesday, April 2, 2024 at 7:14:15 AM UTC+5:30 Samith Kavishke wrote: > I have attached the changed version of this project. Thank you! > > On Monday, April 1, 2024 at 2:43:

[sympy] Re: SymPy integration with LLM (generative AI)

Are there any plans from our side for the LLM that use Sympy? On Friday, April 12, 2024 at 2:11:13 AM UTC+5:30 Francesco Bonazzi wrote: > Their example jupyter notebook: > > https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/blob/master/cookbook/llm_symbolic_math.ipynb > > On Thursday, April 11, 2024 at

Re: [sympy] Re: GSOC: Benchmark Project Questions

you have missed the contributions part, I guess. On Monday, April 1, 2024 at 11:43:05 PM UTC+5:30 samm...@gmail.com wrote: > I’m working on integrating this into my proposal right now. Feedback > would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! > Link: GSOC 2024 - Google Docs >

Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

ecture, in >>> order to strengthen my proposal ? or do I need more contributions in sympy >>> repositories. >>> >>> On Sunday, March 24, 2024 at 4:29:40 AM UTC+5:30 Samith Kavishke wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> Thank you, Francesco for your v

Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

Is it worth for me to mention about the Protosym's architecture, in order to strengthen my proposal ? or do I need more contributions in sympy repositories. On Sunday, March 24, 2024 at 4:29:40 AM UTC+5:30 Samith Kavishke wrote: > Hi, > Thank you, Francesco for your valuable insights.

Re: [sympy] SymPy Wedge Product Question

I could not find the problem that you are stating in the video lecture On Thursday, March 21, 2024 at 9:21:52 PM UTC+5:30 kushwahas...@gmail.com wrote: > Can you please specify what purpose you are using it for. I do not know > its use yet but would like to get back to you after researching on

[sympy] Re: Inquiry: Feedback on GSoC Proposals Before Final Submission

Hi ravindu, You can share the proposal here or in the github wiki itself for feedbacks, if you want to share here tag the potential mentor. You can find mentors according to your project, it is in the github wiki. On Thursday, March 21, 2024 at 6:28:11 PM UTC+5:30 ravin...@cse.mrt.ac.lk

Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

I think, I understood the point you are making. If we are going to redefine the tree structure in matchpy using overridable methods, does that mean we have to use a parser to translate the sympy object type to matchpy or are there any better way to handle the situation. On Saturday, March 16,

[sympy] Re: Seeking Feedback on Floating Point Expression Optimization Project

le 12:25:39 UTC+1 samithkar...@gmail.com > ha scritto: > >> Most of the ideas that still in the page need more work to do as I >> assume, >> >> On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 4:53:55 PM UTC+5:30 Samith Kavishke wrote: >> >>> This is the idea pa

[sympy] Re: Seeking Feedback on Floating Point Expression Optimization Project

Most of the ideas that still in the page need more work to do as I assume, On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 4:53:55 PM UTC+5:30 Samith Kavishke wrote: > This is the idea page: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas > Refer this thread for more info: > https://groups.google.com/u/

[sympy] Re: Seeking Feedback on Floating Point Expression Optimization Project

This is the idea page: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-Ideas Refer this thread for more info: https://groups.google.com/u/0/g/sympy/c/pwr87uHzXIc/m/Eoi8U9u7AAAJ On Monday, March 18, 2024 at 2:06:20 PM UTC+5:30 Tommaso Vaccari wrote: > Hey everyone, > > I hope you're all doing well. I

Re: [sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

Hi, Still I am in the process of understanding the matchpy code base. at the moment I understand that, - Isinstance logic should replace to overridable method or any preferred way ( wrappers around classes new classes also possible without changing the existing code). - __iter__

[sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

Hi, If we are maintianing matchpy as our own repository, Is it okay for us to make the matchpy elements in more integrated way to sympy, or still we need to support the every functionalities that matchpy gave earlier. As an example, issue 69 suggests

[sympy] Re: Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

Hi Francesco, Thank you for the reply. How should I progress in this project? I have several issues encountered when I am going through the matchpy repository, where would I raise those issues. On Wednesday, March 6, 2024 at 3:49:09 PM UTC+5:30 Francesco Bonazzi wrote: > The idea that I have

[sympy] Enhancing the flexibility of MatchPy

Hi, Even though, I have engaged with few chats I thought to introduce me first. I am Samith Karunathilake, a third year undergraduate from University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. I have an interest on contributing for the Sympy for GSOC 2024. As for now I have baisc understanding about few areas,

Re: [sympy] Re: Need GSoC mentors and help updating ideas page

ates to the RUBI project, but I don't know whether it is something > that is still needed for it. Personally I would prefer to avoid > creating a Wolfram Language interpreter if possible. > > Aaron Meurer > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2024 at 11:31 PM Samith Kavishke > wrote: > >

[sympy] Re: Need GSoC mentors and help updating ideas page

Is this concluded, does that mean all the current projects that can be seen in the Ideas page are available for students to apply? (specifically regarding the Wolfram Interpreter) On Tuesday, February 13, 2024 at 3:25:46 AM UTC+5:30 asme...@gmail.com wrote: > Another thing I forgot to mention:

Re: [sympy] Proposal for Enhancements to the Pow Class in SymPy

You can see some of the ideas that are already in sympy idea page in wiki. On Sunday, March 3, 2024 at 10:10:08 AM UTC+5:30 mariyala...@gmail.com wrote: > > I am writing to express my interest in contributing to the SymPy project > for the GSoC 2024. > > I have been exploring SymPy and find

[sympy] Re: Have a Idea to contribute to community

Hi Sudheendra, I think your proposal has been sent 5 times keep one message and remove others. Best Regards, Samith Kavishke On Saturday, March 2, 2024 at 10:46:26 PM UTC+5:30 sudheendra...@gmail.com wrote: > Namaskaram (Hello), > Sympy . > > I am Diggai Sudheendra pursuing b.te

Re: [sympy] GSOC Application: Creating a Wolfram Mathematica Interpreter with Sympy

Is that means this project is not going to be continued? On Saturday, March 25, 2023 at 2:12:27 AM UTC+5:30 Oscar wrote: > There already is mathics which is a Wolfram Language interpreter that > is based on SymPy. It would seem a bit odd to create a new one. > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2023 at 19:48,

Re: [sympy] GSOC Application: Creating a Wolfram Mathematica Interpreter with Sympy

Referred in the sense, sympy.rubi repository On Saturday, March 2, 2024 at 7:04:17 PM UTC+5:30 Samith Kavishke wrote: > I referred this repository currently it is not well maintained, and it > throws several issues due to not changing the importing directories as > well. And it does

Re: [sympy] GSOC Application: Creating a Wolfram Mathematica Interpreter with Sympy

I referred this repository currently it is not well maintained, and it throws several issues due to not changing the importing directories as well. And it does not have a proper Readme.md file, I will lookin to fix that file and importing issues at the moment. Best Regards, Samith Kavishke

[sympy] About the idea list

Hi Everyone, I am samith, computer sciennce and engineering undergraduate and mathematics entusiast. I woould like to contribute to sympy repository for the GSOC 24. What are the available ideas at this moment, I saw that project ideas were not updated whether they were completed or not. where

[sympy] GSOC 23

I would like to enhance the statistics module in the Sympy for the GSOC 23 can some one help me on this Thanks in advance.! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[sympy] GSOC 23

Hi,I am Samith. Can some one check my pull request and give me some feedback, my pull request is #24814 this my first contribution to Sympy and I'm willing to do more contributions. I am hoping to apply for the GSOC 23 under Sympy. Thank you for your time. -- You received this message

[sympy] GSOC 23

Hi everyone, I am Samith Kavishke, a second-year computer science and engineering undergraduate student from the University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. This is my first-time participation in GSOC, and I am excited to contribute to Sympy. I have participated in international mathematics Olympiads

[sympy] GSOC 23

Hi I am Samith Kavishke, computer and engineering undergraduate student at University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka. This is my first time of participation in GSOC, and my first time in Sympy library system. I am confident in using python,C++,java and I have strong mathematics background with several