[sympy] Feedback for GSoC proposal

Hi! I am interested in implementing a module dedicated to abstract concepts in Linear Algebra such as Vector spaces. I have completed the timeline and uploaded my proposal on the wiki page. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. GSoC 2017: Implementing a Vector space module

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

OK, I get it. or have I committed a mistake elsewhere? No, I just didn't see this power. Szymon W dniu niedziela, 2 kwietnia 2017 10:34:11 UTC+2 użytkownik Sagar Bharadwaj napisał: > > Hi Szymon, > Thank you for reviewing my proposal. > In the Lame coefficients formula in my proposal, I

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

Hi Szymon, Thank you for reviewing my proposal. In the Lame coefficients formula in my proposal, I have raised the whole expression to the power half, which is equivalent to taking it's root. I think you might have missed that because it's in small font. Was that the mistake you were referring

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

Hi Sagar, I found mistake in your proposal. Lame coefficient are defined as you wrote, but you should also take a root from your formula. See at wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curvilinear_coordinates#Lam.C3.A9_coefficients They are defined as a norm of vector Diff(r(q1,q2,q3), qi)

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

I have made the required changes in both the wiki and the doc. Please look into the 'Differential Geometry Functions' subsection in 'Implementation' section. Also the 'June 15 - June 22' period in the Timeline. On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 5:35:58 PM UTC+5:30, brombo wrote: > > You proposal is

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

I have made the suggested changes in both the wiki and the doc. Please review. On Saturday, April 1, 2017 at 5:35:58 PM UTC+5:30, brombo wrote: > > You proposal is very good. My only suggestion is that you may want a > class for vector differential operators (gradient operator). If the >

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

Any other suggestions? Anything more that needs to be done on the project other than what I mentioned? On 1 Apr 2017 6:53 p.m., "Sagar Bharadwaj" wrote: > Yes. There is a class called Del in sympy.vector.deloperator.py. But in > current implementation, it does not

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

Yes. There is a class called Del in sympy.vector.deloperator.py. But in current implementation, it does not return the del operator ( the grad operator). It only calculates gradient, curl and divergence. Thank you for the suggestion. Even I was thinking returning a del operator from del class

Re: [sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

You proposal is very good. My only suggestion is that you may want a class for vector differential operators (gradient operator). If the coordinate system constructor returns the gradient operator you could (in future) overload * and ^ operators so that if f is a scalar field and V a vector

[sympy] Feedback for GSoC Proposal

I am interested in Implementing multiple coordinate systems for Vectors in SymPy. I have completed the timeline and here is my proposal. Please Review it and give me you valuable suggestions. GitHub Wiki Page (Better formatting)

Re: [sympy] Feedback on GSoC Proposal

Mikayla, Have a look at this proposal from last year: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/GSoC-2016-Application-Sampad-Kumar-Saha:-Singularity-Functions It is a very well designed proposal. Compare yours to it and I think you'll see a number of improvements you can make. I also agree with

[sympy] Feedback on GSoC Proposal

I have a first draft of my Google Summer of Code project proposal about vector coordinate systems, and I would love to get some feedback and suggestions about it to make it stronger! Here's the link: