Thanks for the writeup. I agree with you about tooling. For
documentation in particular, over use of tooling can lead to a
situation where documentation is written more for machines than
humans. Consistency in formatting is important and certainly makes it
easier for humans to read documentation, b
The numpydoc validator is available at
https://github.com/numpy/numpydoc/blob/master/numpydoc/validate.py and can
be run with python -m numpydoc --validate
However, it has some limitations out-of-the-box, e.g. it does not offer
package-wide validation or any form of .rst parsing. Rather, it acc
You mentioned in your proposal that you contributed to the numpydoc
validator. Can you reference where that work is? Where is the source
for the numpydoc validator?
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:23 PM Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> Thanks for doing this. Our style guide that was developed last
Thanks for doing this. Our style guide that was developed last year
differs from numpydoc in a few ways, and it also has some additional
things. But being able to automatically validate those things that can
be validated is good.
Aaron Meurer
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 2:18 PM 'Brandon David' via sy
Hello SymPy mentors!
I apologize that this introduction is coming so late; I was unable to take
advantage of the "exploration" period and didn't know until just recently
that applicants are still allowed to contact mentors even after the
application deadline. I have been hoping to speak with so
