I think that having a way of getting publication quality output would be
great. However, I think for what most people do the good interactive
graphics of the plotly (2D, mostly, see https://plotly.com/python/) and K3d
(3D, see https://github.com/K3D-tools/K3D-jupyter) are better.
If enough peop
Davide,
Thank you for working on this. I am particularly interested in K3D as I
have been using it for data and am very impressed. I will look at this, but
not for at least two weeks. We are approaching exams...
Jonathan
On Monday, May 3, 2021 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-5 sandona...@gmail.com wrote:
>
I looked at both packages and what I did not see was the ability to use
LaTeX to annotate the figures which to me is a back breaker for report
quality graphics.
On 11/10/21 7:05 PM, gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
I think that having a way of getting publication quality output would
be great. However,
Both plotly and k3d support rendered LaTex for labels, text, etc.
Some pages with very simple examples for
Plotly: https://plotly.com/python/LaTeX/
K3D: https://k3d-jupyter.org/basic_functionality/Text.html
Again, I would not argue that these packages easily generate publication
quality graphics,
FYI attached is a figure I generated with Asymptote for a Foucault
pendulum.
On 11/11/21 7:58 AM, gu...@uwosh.edu wrote:
Both plotly and k3d support rendered LaTex for labels, text, etc.
Some pages with very simple examples for
Plotly: https://plotly.com/python/LaTeX/
K3D: https://k3d-jupyter.o
Asymptote is capable of creating high-quality drawings, on par with what
you would find in Springer books. I feel it produces superior results.
Am Do., 11. Nov. 2021 um 14:02 Uhr schrieb Alan Bromborsky <
abrombo...@gmail.com>:
> FYI attached is a figure I generated with Asymptote for a Foucault
The wiki page explains what is different about the internal working of
Asymptote -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymptote_(vector_graphics_language)
On 11/11/21 8:11 AM, Andreas Schuldei wrote:
Asymptote is capable of creating high-quality drawings, on par with
what you would find in Springer
On Aug 14, 10:42 pm, sunite wrote:
> Hi, I was wondering if there was any method to create such a plot.
> Replies much appreciated!!!
If a wire frame of such things is sufficient, Eck's xModel applet is a
simple way to generate a wireframe of a surface and then be able to
rotate it, all throug
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find a way to do something which is usually the default
> behavior in matplotlib. That is, when I show() multiple plots in a
> single figure, they are shown in different colors automatically. For
> example:
>
import m
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Amit Saha wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to find a way to do something which is usually the default
> behavior in matplotlib. That is, when I show() multiple plots in a
> single figure, they are shown in different colors automatically. For
> example:
>
import m
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is one of my notebooks (work in progress) for the sympy tutorial:
>
> http://nbviewer.ipython.org/5799312
>
> How can I set line colors in the plot at the prompt [8]? I didn't find
> it in the docs:
>
> http://docs.sympy.org/dev
Sympy version 0.7.6-git, up-to-date with the current master on github.
Le dimanche 26 avril 2015 16:42:12 UTC-4, j.gont...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> Hi,
>
> I ran test on the latest sympy fetched from github and the plot_implicit
> tests are failing, complaining that "Eq" is not defined. I am using
I figured out a workaround using carefully crafted Piecewise functions. But
I did open this issue:
https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/12804
because I think it should just work (it mostly does).
moorepants.info
+01 530-601-9791
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Jason Moore wrote:
> I've been
I will write a more complete answer soon, but in the meantime you can
check the `examples` folder. In the docs for the plotting module
search for "aesthetics".
On 17 June 2013 21:00, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Ondřej Čertík
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is one of my n
And by the way, as you mentioned, the docs for the plotting module can
indeed be better.
On 17 June 2013 21:56, Stefan Krastanov wrote:
> I answer your question in the attached notebook. But you should really
> check the 4 or 5 `example/beginner/plot*` ipython notebooks as they
> show much nicer
Hi Stefan,
This is awesome, thanks a lot! I tested your notebook, it works great.
As far as the
examples/beginner/plot_colors.ipynb
goes, I had to add the following two lines into the first cell:
from sympy import sin, var, cos, pi, sqrt
var("x y")
I guess it was assumed it would do this autom
Indeed, the example notebooks assume that certain setup was performed.
I guess it is a leftover from before I learned that it is an ipython
antipattern.
On 17 June 2013 22:49, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> This is awesome, thanks a lot! I tested your notebook, it works great.
> As far as
Yeah, just yesterday I realized that it's probably better to launch
then notebook just with
ipython notebook
and then just have a cell that initializes things properly (if
needed), so for plotting I use:
%pylab inline
Ondrej
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:31 PM, Stefan Krastanov
wrote:
> Indeed, t
Speaking of antipatterns, don't use var unless it is a completely
throwaway interactive session.
Also, init_printing() should also do the pylab (it may be broken in
0.7.2 though, so test it).
Aaron Meurer
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Ondřej Čertík wrote:
> Yeah, just yesterday I realized th
Am 27.04.2015 um 00:09 schrieb j.gonthie...@gmail.com:
Sympy version 0.7.6-git, up-to-date with the current master on github.
Okay, so we're seeing the same failure as you do.
Note to maintainers: To reproduce the error, install matplotlib and run
bin/test plot_implicit
The plot_implicit ma
@Joachim: Thank you very much for looking into it. I am not using implicit
plot, I simply noticed the test failing while developing something else.
Thanks again!
Le lundi 27 avril 2015 05:18:20 UTC-4, Joachim Durchholz a écrit :
>
> Am 27.04.2015 um 00:09 schrieb j.gont...@gmail.com :
> > Sympy
I think its better to have explicit names like plot_3d, plot_2d instead of
having a
single plot function. There has been some discussion in the pull request
about this.
Normally, very few people read through the whole documentation and there
is a chance that they will miss some of the features
> I think its better to have explicit names like plot_3d, plot_2d instead of
> having a
> single plot function.
I agree. I would like to have explicit plot_blah_blah with explicit
arguments (free variables and ranges) and one implicit plot() with all
the magic and guessing for the arguments. At th
It would probably be cleaner to make plot() call the explicit
functions, not the other way around.
Aaron Meurer
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:39 AM, krastanov.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
>> I think its better to have explicit names like plot_3d, plot_2d instead of
>> having a
>> single plot function.
>
Here's a list of all the kinds of plots Maple can do:
http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=worksheet/reference/PlottingGuide&term=plottingguide.
A lot of them are unrelated to SymPy (they just plot data, so you
should probably just use matplotlib directly in that case), but t
It's a good idea. But a big number of arguments is confusing a lot.
may be instead of a large set of arguments in a function it's better
to implement something like a style-class?
On Sunday, April 15, 2012 11:22:02 PM UTC+3, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> It would probably be cleaner to make plot() call
26 matches
Mail list logo
