On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 01:55:25AM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Jim Jewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Just a bit of history; I am explicitly abstaining on which license is
best.]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:47PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Hi,
thanks everyone for the discussion about the licences. After valuing all
the arguments for and against LGPL, I am making a decisions, that:
SymPy is going to stay *BSD*
And as long as I am going to do all the releases
[Just a bit of history; I am explicitly abstaining on which license is best.]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:47PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
anyone can make any modification and do what he
wants with it, including
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Jim Jewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Just a bit of history; I am explicitly abstaining on which license is
best.]
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Kirill Smelkov
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:42:47PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Did you value decisions or did you count votes?
Vinzent
On Nov 16, 11:42 pm, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
thanks everyone for the discussion about the licences. After valuing all
the arguments for and against LGPL, I am making a decisions, that:
SymPy is going to stay *BSD*
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:57 PM, Vinzent Steinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you value decisions or did you count votes?
Both. I valued arguments and what is best for our community and best
for sympy in my opinion as the project leader.
Ondrej
It is in these situations that I think it is fully appropriate for
Ondrej to act as BDFL of sympy, so I don't think he necessarily should
simply count votes. With that said, great job Ondrej for being
willing to open this up for a discussion. I am also impressed by the
sympy community in begin
