On 27 Mai, 08:43, Chris Smith wrote:
> I think that with igcd, ilcm, igcdex, ifib, and ifac there is precedence for
> using these simple names.
This is a good point. However the less verbose names are cryptic to
me, whereas the current ones are easy to understand intuitively. What
about having bo
That's ok with me. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Chris Smith wrote:
> That's ok with me. Let's see if anyone else has an opinion.
I for myself prefer the longer names. I don't think this is used so
often, so that you should shorten it. But I am ok either way.
Ondrej
--
You received this message because you ar
