On 16 Mai, 23:33, Fredrik Johansson fredrik.johans...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maple also uses BesselJ, and I couldn't find a spherical function in
Maple also uses BesselJ, and I couldn't find a spherical function in
the help, but I know little about Bessel functions, so I could have
missed it. I think that this is best. Typing underscores is too
difficult, but just jn is too ambiguous. It also allows for expansion
to BesselI,
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maple also uses BesselJ, and I couldn't find a spherical function in
the help, but I know little about Bessel functions, so I could have
missed it. I think that this is best. Typing underscores is too
difficult, but
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 01:29:55PM -0700, Ondrej Certik wrote:
I was just thinking about this too. Basically I think we should stick
to Python convention and that's it. Python convention is to use
CamelCase() for classes and lower_case_with_underscores() for
functions. Most of the things are
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Aaron S. Meurer asmeu...@gmail.com wrote:
Maple also uses BesselJ, and I couldn't find a spherical function in
the help, but I know little about Bessel functions, so I could have
missed
